Literature DB >> 28734017

Evaluation of the impact of strain correction on the orientation of cardiac diffusion tensors with in vivo and ex vivo porcine hearts.

Pedro F Ferreira1,2, Sonia Nielles-Vallespin3, Andrew D Scott1,2, Ranil de Silva1,2, Philip J Kilner1,2, Daniel B Ennis4, Daniel A Auger5, Jonathan D Suever6, Xiaodong Zhong7, Bruce S Spottiswoode8, Dudley J Pennell1,2, Andrew E Arai3, David N Firmin1,2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the importance of strain-correcting stimulated echo acquisition mode echo-planar imaging cardiac diffusion tensor imaging.
METHODS: Healthy pigs (n = 11) were successfully scanned with a 3D cine displacement-encoded imaging with stimulated echoes and a monopolar-stimulated echo-planar imaging diffusion tensor imaging sequence at 3 T during diastasis, peak systole, and strain sweet spots in a midventricular short-axis slice. The same diffusion tensor imaging sequence was repeated ex vivo after arresting the hearts in either a relaxed (KCl-induced) or contracted (BaCl2 -induced) state. The displacement-encoded imaging with stimulated echoes data were used to strain-correct the in vivo cardiac diffusion tensor imaging in diastole and systole. The orientation of the primary (helix angles) and secondary (E2A) diffusion eigenvectors was compared with and without strain correction and to the strain-free ex vivo data.
RESULTS: Strain correction reduces systolic E2A significantly when compared without strain correction and ex vivo (median absolute E2A = 34.3° versus E2A = 57.1° (P = 0.01), E2A = 60.5° (P = 0.006), respectively). The systolic distribution of E2A without strain correction is closer to the contracted ex vivo distribution than with strain correction, root mean square deviation of 0.027 versus 0.038.
CONCLUSIONS: The current strain-correction model amplifies the contribution of microscopic strain to diffusion resulting in an overcorrection of E2A. Results show that a new model that considers cellular rearrangement is required. Magn Reson Med 79:2205-2215, 2018.
© 2017 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. © 2017 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cardiac; cardiomyocyte; diffusion tensor imaging; microstructure; sheetlets; strain

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28734017      PMCID: PMC5776058          DOI: 10.1002/mrm.26850

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Med        ISSN: 0740-3194            Impact factor:   4.668


  42 in total

1.  Automated imaging of extended tissue volumes using confocal microscopy.

Authors:  Gregory B Sands; Dane A Gerneke; Darren A Hooks; Colin R Green; Bruce H Smaill; Ian J Legrice
Journal:  Microsc Res Tech       Date:  2005-08-01       Impact factor: 2.769

2.  Histological validation of myocardial microstructure obtained from diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  D F Scollan; A Holmes; R Winslow; J Forder
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1998-12

3.  Cellular basis for volume related wall thickness changes in the rat left ventricle.

Authors:  H M Spotnitz; W D Spotnitz; T S Cottrell; D Spiro; E H Sonnenblick
Journal:  J Mol Cell Cardiol       Date:  1974-08       Impact factor: 5.000

4.  Fiber orientation in the canine left ventricle during diastole and systole.

Authors:  D D Streeter; H M Spotnitz; D P Patel; J Ross; E H Sonnenblick
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  1969-03       Impact factor: 17.367

5.  Imaging myocardial fiber architecture in vivo with magnetic resonance.

Authors:  T G Reese; R M Weisskoff; R N Smith; B R Rosen; R E Dinsmore; V J Wedeen
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  In vivo cardiac diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging: quantification of normal perfusion and diffusion coefficients with intravoxel incoherent motion imaging.

Authors:  Benedicte M A Delattre; Magalie Viallon; Hongjiang Wei; Yuemin M Zhu; Thorsten Feiweier; Vinay M Pai; Han Wen; Pierre Croisille
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 6.016

7.  Probing dynamic myocardial microstructure with cardiac magnetic resonance diffusion tensor imaging.

Authors:  Leon Axel; Van J Wedeen; Daniel B Ennis
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 5.364

8.  Mapping cardiac microstructure of rabbit heart in different mechanical states by high resolution diffusion tensor imaging: A proof-of-principle study.

Authors:  Irvin Teh; Rebecca A B Burton; Darryl McClymont; Rebecca A Capel; Daniel Aston; Peter Kohl; Jürgen E Schneider
Journal:  Prog Biophys Mol Biol       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 3.667

9.  Reproducibility of in-vivo diffusion tensor cardiovascular magnetic resonance in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Laura-Ann McGill; Tevfik F Ismail; Sonia Nielles-Vallespin; Pedro Ferreira; Andrew D Scott; Michael Roughton; Philip J Kilner; S Yen Ho; Karen P McCarthy; Peter D Gatehouse; Ranil de Silva; Peter Speier; Thorsten Feiweier; Choukkri Mekkaoui; David E Sosnovik; Sanjay K Prasad; David N Firmin; Dudley J Pennell
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2012-12-24       Impact factor: 5.364

10.  Histo-anatomical structure of the living isolated rat heart in two contraction states assessed by diffusion tensor MRI.

Authors:  Patrick W Hales; Jürgen E Schneider; Rebecca A B Burton; Benjamin J Wright; Christian Bollensdorff; Peter Kohl
Journal:  Prog Biophys Mol Biol       Date:  2012-08-07       Impact factor: 3.667

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Magnetic Resonance-Based Characterization of Myocardial Architecture.

Authors:  David E Sosnovik
Journal:  Heart Fail Clin       Date:  2020-10-28       Impact factor: 3.179

2.  Comparison of interpolation methods of predominant cardiomyocyte orientation from in vivo and ex vivo cardiac diffusion tensor imaging data.

Authors:  Johanna Stimm; Christian Guenthner; Sebastian Kozerke; Christian T Stoeck
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2021-12-29       Impact factor: 4.478

3.  An in-vivo comparison of stimulated-echo and motion compensated spin-echo sequences for 3 T diffusion tensor cardiovascular magnetic resonance at multiple cardiac phases.

Authors:  Andrew D Scott; Sonia Nielles-Vallespin; Pedro F Ferreira; Zohya Khalique; Peter D Gatehouse; Philip Kilner; Dudley J Pennell; David N Firmin
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2018-01-03       Impact factor: 5.364

4.  Identification of Myocardial Disarray in Patients With Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy and Ventricular Arrhythmias.

Authors:  Rina Ariga; Elizabeth M Tunnicliffe; Sanjay G Manohar; Masliza Mahmod; Betty Raman; Stefan K Piechnik; Jane M Francis; Matthew D Robson; Stefan Neubauer; Hugh Watkins
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2019-05-28       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  Probing cardiomyocyte mobility with multi-phase cardiac diffusion tensor MRI.

Authors:  Kévin Moulin; Ilya A Verzhbinsky; Nyasha G Maforo; Luigi E Perotti; Daniel B Ennis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-11-12       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Myofiber strain in healthy humans using DENSE and cDTI.

Authors:  Kévin Moulin; Pierre Croisille; Magalie Viallon; Ilya A Verzhbinsky; Luigi E Perotti; Daniel B Ennis
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2021-02-22       Impact factor: 3.737

7.  Diffusion tensor cardiovascular magnetic resonance in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a comparison of motion-compensated spin echo and stimulated echo techniques.

Authors:  Zohya Khalique; Andrew D Scott; Pedro F Ferreira; Sonia Nielles-Vallespin; David N Firmin; Dudley J Pennell
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2019-11-22       Impact factor: 2.310

8.  Development of a cardiovascular magnetic resonance-compatible large animal isolated heart model for direct comparison of beating and arrested hearts.

Authors:  Andrew D Scott; Tim Jackson; Zohya Khalique; Margarita Gorodezky; Ben Pardoe; Lale Begum; V Domenico Bruno; Rasheda A Chowdhury; Pedro F Ferreira; Sonia Nielles-Vallespin; Malte Roehl; Karen P McCarthy; Padmini Sarathchandra; Jan N Rose; Denis J Doorly; Dudley J Pennell; Raimondo Ascione; Ranil de Silva; David N Firmin
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2022-02-12       Impact factor: 4.478

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.