PURPOSE: To evaluate the importance of strain-correcting stimulated echo acquisition mode echo-planar imaging cardiac diffusion tensor imaging. METHODS: Healthy pigs (n = 11) were successfully scanned with a 3D cine displacement-encoded imaging with stimulated echoes and a monopolar-stimulated echo-planar imaging diffusion tensor imaging sequence at 3 T during diastasis, peak systole, and strain sweet spots in a midventricular short-axis slice. The same diffusion tensor imaging sequence was repeated ex vivo after arresting the hearts in either a relaxed (KCl-induced) or contracted (BaCl2 -induced) state. The displacement-encoded imaging with stimulated echoes data were used to strain-correct the in vivo cardiac diffusion tensor imaging in diastole and systole. The orientation of the primary (helix angles) and secondary (E2A) diffusion eigenvectors was compared with and without strain correction and to the strain-free ex vivo data. RESULTS: Strain correction reduces systolic E2A significantly when compared without strain correction and ex vivo (median absolute E2A = 34.3° versus E2A = 57.1° (P = 0.01), E2A = 60.5° (P = 0.006), respectively). The systolic distribution of E2A without strain correction is closer to the contracted ex vivo distribution than with strain correction, root mean square deviation of 0.027 versus 0.038. CONCLUSIONS: The current strain-correction model amplifies the contribution of microscopic strain to diffusion resulting in an overcorrection of E2A. Results show that a new model that considers cellular rearrangement is required. Magn Reson Med 79:2205-2215, 2018.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the importance of strain-correcting stimulated echo acquisition mode echo-planar imaging cardiac diffusion tensor imaging. METHODS: Healthy pigs (n = 11) were successfully scanned with a 3D cine displacement-encoded imaging with stimulated echoes and a monopolar-stimulated echo-planar imaging diffusion tensor imaging sequence at 3 T during diastasis, peak systole, and strain sweet spots in a midventricular short-axis slice. The same diffusion tensor imaging sequence was repeated ex vivo after arresting the hearts in either a relaxed (KCl-induced) or contracted (BaCl2 -induced) state. The displacement-encoded imaging with stimulated echoes data were used to strain-correct the in vivo cardiac diffusion tensor imaging in diastole and systole. The orientation of the primary (helix angles) and secondary (E2A) diffusion eigenvectors was compared with and without strain correction and to the strain-free ex vivo data. RESULTS: Strain correction reduces systolic E2A significantly when compared without strain correction and ex vivo (median absolute E2A = 34.3° versus E2A = 57.1° (P = 0.01), E2A = 60.5° (P = 0.006), respectively). The systolic distribution of E2A without strain correction is closer to the contracted ex vivo distribution than with strain correction, root mean square deviation of 0.027 versus 0.038. CONCLUSIONS: The current strain-correction model amplifies the contribution of microscopic strain to diffusion resulting in an overcorrection of E2A. Results show that a new model that considers cellular rearrangement is required. Magn Reson Med 79:2205-2215, 2018.
Authors: Gregory B Sands; Dane A Gerneke; Darren A Hooks; Colin R Green; Bruce H Smaill; Ian J Legrice Journal: Microsc Res Tech Date: 2005-08-01 Impact factor: 2.769
Authors: Benedicte M A Delattre; Magalie Viallon; Hongjiang Wei; Yuemin M Zhu; Thorsten Feiweier; Vinay M Pai; Han Wen; Pierre Croisille Journal: Invest Radiol Date: 2012-11 Impact factor: 6.016
Authors: Irvin Teh; Rebecca A B Burton; Darryl McClymont; Rebecca A Capel; Daniel Aston; Peter Kohl; Jürgen E Schneider Journal: Prog Biophys Mol Biol Date: 2016-06-16 Impact factor: 3.667
Authors: Laura-Ann McGill; Tevfik F Ismail; Sonia Nielles-Vallespin; Pedro Ferreira; Andrew D Scott; Michael Roughton; Philip J Kilner; S Yen Ho; Karen P McCarthy; Peter D Gatehouse; Ranil de Silva; Peter Speier; Thorsten Feiweier; Choukkri Mekkaoui; David E Sosnovik; Sanjay K Prasad; David N Firmin; Dudley J Pennell Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Date: 2012-12-24 Impact factor: 5.364
Authors: Patrick W Hales; Jürgen E Schneider; Rebecca A B Burton; Benjamin J Wright; Christian Bollensdorff; Peter Kohl Journal: Prog Biophys Mol Biol Date: 2012-08-07 Impact factor: 3.667
Authors: Andrew D Scott; Sonia Nielles-Vallespin; Pedro F Ferreira; Zohya Khalique; Peter D Gatehouse; Philip Kilner; Dudley J Pennell; David N Firmin Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Date: 2018-01-03 Impact factor: 5.364
Authors: Rina Ariga; Elizabeth M Tunnicliffe; Sanjay G Manohar; Masliza Mahmod; Betty Raman; Stefan K Piechnik; Jane M Francis; Matthew D Robson; Stefan Neubauer; Hugh Watkins Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2019-05-28 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Kévin Moulin; Pierre Croisille; Magalie Viallon; Ilya A Verzhbinsky; Luigi E Perotti; Daniel B Ennis Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2021-02-22 Impact factor: 3.737
Authors: Zohya Khalique; Andrew D Scott; Pedro F Ferreira; Sonia Nielles-Vallespin; David N Firmin; Dudley J Pennell Journal: MAGMA Date: 2019-11-22 Impact factor: 2.310
Authors: Andrew D Scott; Tim Jackson; Zohya Khalique; Margarita Gorodezky; Ben Pardoe; Lale Begum; V Domenico Bruno; Rasheda A Chowdhury; Pedro F Ferreira; Sonia Nielles-Vallespin; Malte Roehl; Karen P McCarthy; Padmini Sarathchandra; Jan N Rose; Denis J Doorly; Dudley J Pennell; Raimondo Ascione; Ranil de Silva; David N Firmin Journal: NMR Biomed Date: 2022-02-12 Impact factor: 4.478