Literature DB >> 22778426

Compensatory mechanisms for ameliorating the fundamental trade-off between predator avoidance and foraging.

Jennifer S Thaler1, Scott H McArt, Ian Kaplan.   

Abstract

Most organisms face the problem of foraging and maintaining growth while avoiding predators. Typical animal responses to predator exposure include reduced feeding, elevated metabolism, and altered development rate, all of which can be beneficial in the presence of predators but detrimental in their absence. How then do animals balance growth and predator avoidance? In a series of field and greenhouse experiments, we document that the tobacco hornworm caterpillar, Manduca sexta, reduced feeding by 30-40% owing to the risk of predation by stink bugs, but developed more rapidly and gained the same mass as unthreatened caterpillars. Assimilation efficiency, extraction of nitrogen from food, and percent body lipid content all increased during the initial phase (1-3 d) of predation risk, indicating that enhanced nutritional physiology allows caterpillars to compensate when threatened. However, we report physiological costs of predation risk, including altered body composition (decreased glycogen) and reductions in assimilation efficiency later in development. Our findings indicate that hornworm caterpillars use temporally dynamic compensatory mechanisms that ameliorate the trade-off between predator avoidance and growth in the short term, deferring costs to a period when they are less vulnerable to predation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22778426      PMCID: PMC3409718          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1208070109

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  23 in total

1.  Compensation for a bad start: grow now, pay later?

Authors:  N B. Metcalfe; P Monaghan
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2001-05-01       Impact factor: 17.712

2.  Deferred costs of compensatory growth after autumnal food shortage in juvenile salmon.

Authors:  I J Morgan; N B Metcalfe
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2001-02-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Physiological costs of compensatory growth in a damselfly.

Authors:  Robby Stoks; Marjan De Block; Mark A McPeek
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 5.499

4.  Optimizing time and resource allocation trade-offs for investment into morphological and behavioral defense.

Authors:  Ulrich K Steiner; Thomas Pfeiffer
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2006-12-07       Impact factor: 3.926

5.  Insect predators affect plant resistance via density- and trait-mediated indirect interactions.

Authors:  Celine A M Griffin; Jennifer S Thaler
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 9.492

6.  Scared fish get lazy, and lazy fish get fat.

Authors:  Frank Johansson; Jens Andersson
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2009-03-12       Impact factor: 5.091

7.  Diet-induced head allometry among foliage-chewing insects and its importance for graminivores.

Authors:  E A Bernays
Journal:  Science       Date:  1986-01-31       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Direct and indirect effects of predation and predation risk in old-field interaction webs.

Authors:  O J Schmitz
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 3.926

9.  The sensitive hare: sublethal effects of predator stress on reproduction in snowshoe hares.

Authors:  Michael J Sheriff; Charles J Krebs; Rudy Boonstra
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2009-04-23       Impact factor: 5.091

10.  The growth/predation risk trade-off: so what is the mechanism?

Authors:  Mark A McPeek
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2004-04-26       Impact factor: 3.926

View more
  30 in total

1.  Short- and long-term behavioural, physiological and stoichiometric responses to predation risk indicate chronic stress and compensatory mechanisms.

Authors:  Marie Van Dievel; Lizanne Janssens; Robby Stoks
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Impacts of metformin and aspirin on life history features and longevity of crickets: trade-offs versus cost-free life extension?

Authors:  Harvir Hans; Asad Lone; Vadim Aksenov; C David Rollo
Journal:  Age (Dordr)       Date:  2015-04-02

3.  Virus strains differentially induce plant susceptibility to aphid vectors and chewing herbivores.

Authors:  Mônica F Kersch-Becker; Jennifer S Thaler
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Ecophysiological effects of predation risk; an integration across disciplines.

Authors:  Michael J Sheriff; Jennifer S Thaler
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Nonadditive impacts of temperature and basal resource availability on predator-prey interactions and phenotypes.

Authors:  Zacharia J Costa; Osamu Kishida
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2015-03-28       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Does fear beget fear? Risk-mediated habitat selection triggers predator avoidance at lower trophic levels.

Authors:  Carmen K Blubaugh; Ivy V Widick; Ian Kaplan
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Diagnosing predation risk effects on demography: can measuring physiology provide the means?

Authors:  Liana Y Zanette; Michael Clinchy; Justin P Suraci
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2014-09-19       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  The effect of predator presence on the behavioral sequence from host selection to reproduction in an invulnerable stage of insect prey.

Authors:  Sara L Hermann; Jennifer S Thaler
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2018-06-14       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Plant and herbivore ontogeny interact to shape the preference, performance and chemical defense of a specialist herbivore.

Authors:  Carolina Quintero; M Deane Bowers
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2018-01-30       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Fear of predation alters soil carbon dioxide flux and nitrogen content.

Authors:  Michael I Sitvarin; Ann L Rypstra
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.703

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.