Literature DB >> 28730190

Comparison of halide receptors based on H, halogen, chalcogen, pnicogen, and tetrel bonds.

Steve Scheiner1.   

Abstract

A series of halide receptors are constructed and the geometries and energetics of their binding to F-, Cl-, and Br- assessed by quantum calculations. The dicationic receptors are based on a pair of imidazolium units, connected via a benzene spacer. The imidazoliums each donate a proton to a halide in a pair of H-bonds. Replacement of the two bonding protons by Br leads to binding via a pair of halogen bonds. Likewise, chalcogen, pnicogen, and tetrel bonds occur when the protons are replaced, respectively, by Se, As, and Ge. Regardless of the binding group considered, F- is bound much more strongly than are Cl- and Br-. With respect to the latter two halides, the binding energy is not very sensitive to the nature of the binding atom, whether H or some other atom. But there is a great deal of differentiation with respect to F-, where the order varies as tetrel > H ∼ pnicogen > halogen > chalcogen. The replacement of the various binding atoms by their analogues in the next row of the periodic table enhances the fluoride binding energy by 22-56%. The strongest fluoride binding agents utilize the tetrel bonds of the Sn atom, whereas it is I-halogen bonds that are preferred for Cl- and Br-. After incorporation of thermal and entropic effects, the halogen, chalcogen, and pnicogen bonding receptors do not represent much of an improvement over H-bonds with regard to this selectivity for F-, even I which binds quite strongly. In stark contrast, the tetrel-bonding derivatives, both Ge and Sn, show by far the greatest selectivity for F- over the other halides, as much as 1013, an enhancement of six orders of magnitude when compared to the H-bonding receptor.

Entities:  

Year:  2017        PMID: 28730190     DOI: 10.1039/c7fd00043j

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Faraday Discuss        ISSN: 1359-6640            Impact factor:   4.008


  8 in total

1.  Crystallographic and Computational Characterization of Methyl Tetrel Bonding in S-Adenosylmethionine-Dependent Methyltransferases.

Authors:  Raymond C Trievel; Steve Scheiner
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2018-11-13       Impact factor: 4.411

2.  Strong Tetrel Bonds: Theoretical Aspects and Experimental Evidence.

Authors:  Mehdi D Esrafili; Parisasadat Mousavian
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 4.411

3.  Involvement of Arsenic Atom of AsF3 in Five Pnicogen Bonds: Differences between X-ray Structure and Theoretical Models.

Authors:  Steve Scheiner; Mariusz Michalczyk; Wiktor Zierkiewicz
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-10-01       Impact factor: 4.927

4.  Tetrel Bonding as a Vehicle for Strong and Selective Anion Binding.

Authors:  Steve Scheiner
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2018-05-11       Impact factor: 4.411

5.  Halogen Bonds Formed between Substituted Imidazoliums and N Bases of Varying N-Hybridization.

Authors:  Steve Scheiner
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2017-09-29       Impact factor: 4.411

6.  Comparative Strengths of Tetrel, Pnicogen, Chalcogen, and Halogen Bonds and Contributing Factors.

Authors:  Wenbo Dong; Qingzhong Li; Steve Scheiner
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2018-07-10       Impact factor: 4.411

7.  Tweaking the Charge Transfer: Bonding Analysis of Bismuth(III) Complexes with a Flexidentate Phosphane Ligand.

Authors:  Réka Mokrai; Jamie Barrett; David C Apperley; Zoltán Benkő; Dominikus Heift
Journal:  Inorg Chem       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 5.165

8.  Interactions in Model Ionic Dyads and Triads Containing Tetrel Atoms.

Authors:  Sean A C McDowell; Ruijing Wang; Qingzhong Li
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2020-09-14       Impact factor: 4.411

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.