Literature DB >> 20839664

Optimal amount of anisometropia for pseudophakic monovision.

Ken Hayashi1, Motoaki Yoshida, Shin-Ichi Manabe, Hideyuki Hayashi.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the optimal target anisometropia for pseudophakic monovision.
METHODS: Thirty-five bilaterally pseudophakic patients who received monofocal intraocular lenses were included in the study. Binocular corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) and binocular distance-corrected near visual acuity (DCNVA) and stereoacuity were measured after simulating 1.00, 1.50, and 2.00 diopters (D) of monovision by adding the appropriate spherical lens to the nondominant eye. We presumed that mean binocular DCNVA of 20/40, binocular CDVA of 20/25, and stereoacuity <100 seconds of arc (arc sec) were necessary for successful monovision.
RESULTS: With no anisometropia, mean binocular DCNVA was 20/97, binocular CDVA was 20/20, and mean stereoacuity was 71 arc sec. With 1.00 D of monovision, mean binocular DCNVA was only 20/60, although binocular CDVA and mean stereoacuity were sufficient. With 1.50 D of monovision, binocular DCNVA was 20/38, binocular CDVA at other distances exceeded 20/21, and stereoacuity was 100 arc sec, which was a 29-arc sec reduction. With 2.00 D of monovision, binocular DCNVA reached 20/31, but stereoacuity was 158 arc sec, which was an 87-arc sec reduction. The number of patients who met the criteria for successful monovision was significantly greater with 1.50 D of monovision than with 1.00 or 2.00 D of monovision (P=.0134).
CONCLUSIONS: Pseudophakic monovision with anisometropia of 1.50 or 2.00 D provides useful binocular visual acuity from far to near. However, because stereopsis with 2.00 D of monovision is substantially impaired, approximately 1.50 D of anisometropia is thought to be optimal for successful monovision. Copyright 2011, SLACK Incorporated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20839664     DOI: 10.3928/1081597X-20100817-01

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Refract Surg        ISSN: 1081-597X            Impact factor:   3.573


  8 in total

Review 1.  A systematic review of pseudophakic monovision for presbyopia correction.

Authors:  Georgios Labiris; Aspa Toli; Aslin Perente; Panagiota Ntonti; Vassilios P Kozobolis
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-06-18       Impact factor: 1.779

2.  Haigis and SRKT formulae accuracy for intentional myopic overcorrection.

Authors:  Rodrigo Faeda Dalto; Miriam A Ferreira; Wilian Queiroz; Roberto Pinto Coelho; Jayter Silva Paula; Andre Messias
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 2.031

3.  Modified monovision with spherical aberration to improve presbyopic through-focus visual performance.

Authors:  Len Zheleznyak; Ramkumar Sabesan; Je-Sun Oh; Scott MacRae; Geunyoung Yoon
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2013-05-03       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 4.  Pseudophakic monovision is an important surgical approach to being spectacle-free.

Authors:  Jianhe Xiao; Caihui Jiang; Maonian Zhang
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2011 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.848

5.  Monovision LASIK in emmetropic presbyopic patients.

Authors:  Michelle Y Peng; Stephen Hannan; David Teenan; Steven J Schallhorn; Julie M Schallhorn
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-09-04

6.  Spectacle Independence And Patient Satisfaction With Pseudophakic Mini-Monovision Using Aberration-Free Intraocular Lens.

Authors:  Tarek Abdelrazek Hafez; Hany Ahmed Helaly
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-10-31

Review 7.  Pharmacological Treatment in Presbyopia.

Authors:  Andrzej Grzybowski; Varis Ruamviboonsuk
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 4.241

8.  Crossed versus conventional pseudophakic monovision for high myopic eyes: a prospective, randomized pilot study.

Authors:  Yan Xun; Wenjuan Wan; Lu Jiang; Ke Hu
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-11-16       Impact factor: 2.209

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.