Literature DB >> 25448995

Binocular visual function of modified pseudophakic monovision.

Ken Hayashi1, Soichiro Ogawa2, Shin-Ichi Manabe2, Koichi Yoshimura2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare binocular visual function of pseudophakic patients having modified monovision (0.75 diopter [D] anisometropia) with that of patients having conventional monovision (1.75 D anisometropia).
DESIGN: Prospective observational study.
METHODS: Eighty-two patients that underwent bilateral implantation of a monofocal intraocular lens were recruited at 3 months postoperatively. Modified monovision was simulated by adding a +0.75 D spherical lens to the nondominant eye, while conventional monovision was simulated by adding a +1.75 D spherical lens. Binocular corrected visual acuity (VA) at various distances, binocular contrast VA (contrast VA) and that with glare (glare VA), and stereoacuity were evaluated.
RESULTS: With modified monovision, mean binocular corrected intermediate VA at 1.0 m was 20/19 and near VA at 0.3 m was 20/51, and stereoacuity was 125 ± 100 seconds of arc. Mean binocular intermediate VA at 1.0 m was significantly better with modified monovision than with conventional monovision (P = .0001), while near VA and intermediate VA at 0.5 m were significantly worse (P < .0001). Mean binocular photopic and mesopic contrast VA and glare VA tended to be better with modified monovision than with conventional monovision, but the difference was not significant. Mean stereoacuity was significantly better with modified monovision than with conventional monovision (P = .0020).
CONCLUSIONS: Modified pseudophakic monovision provided excellent binocular VA from far to intermediate distances, although near VA was worse than that with conventional monovision. Contrast VA with and without glare tended to be better and stereoacuity was significantly better with modified monovision, suggesting that this method is useful for correcting presbyopia without marked impairment of binocular function.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25448995     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2014.10.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0002-9394            Impact factor:   5.258


  9 in total

Review 1.  A systematic review of pseudophakic monovision for presbyopia correction.

Authors:  Georgios Labiris; Aspa Toli; Aslin Perente; Panagiota Ntonti; Vassilios P Kozobolis
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-06-18       Impact factor: 1.779

2.  Binocular visual function of myopic pseudophakic monovision.

Authors:  Ken Hayashi; Motoaki Yoshida; Hiroshi Sasaki; Akira Hirata
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 2.447

3.  Refractive outcomes and optical quality of PRESBYOND laser-blended vision for presbyopia correction.

Authors:  Dan Fu; Aruma Aruma; Ye Xu; Tian Han; Fei Xia; Xing-Tao Zhou
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-10-18       Impact factor: 1.645

Review 4.  Corneal compensation of presbyopia: PresbyLASIK: an updated review.

Authors:  Veronica Vargas-Fragoso; Jorge L Alió
Journal:  Eye Vis (Lond)       Date:  2017-04-13

5.  Safety and satisfaction of myopic small-incision lenticule extraction combined with monovision.

Authors:  Dan Fu; Li Zeng; Jing Zhao; Hua-Mao Miao; Zhi-Qiang Yu; Xing-Tao Zhou
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 2.209

6.  Near Vision Improvement with the Use of a New Topical Compound for Presbyopia Correction: A Prospective, Consecutive Interventional Non-Comparative Clinical Study.

Authors:  Veronica Vargas; Felipe Vejarano; Jorge L Alió
Journal:  Ophthalmol Ther       Date:  2018-11-21

7.  Spectacle Independence And Patient Satisfaction With Pseudophakic Mini-Monovision Using Aberration-Free Intraocular Lens.

Authors:  Tarek Abdelrazek Hafez; Hany Ahmed Helaly
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-10-31

8.  Optimum Refractive Target in Patients with Bilateral Implantation of Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lenses.

Authors:  Mitchell A Jackson; Anna M Edmiston; Raman Bedi
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-02-18

Review 9.  Correction of presbyopia: An integrated update for the practical surgeon.

Authors:  Marie Joan Therese D Balgos; Veronica Vargas; Jorge L Alió
Journal:  Taiwan J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018 Jul-Sep
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.