| Literature DB >> 28728387 |
Mbusiseni Vusumuzi Mkwanazi1, Cypril Ndumiso Ncobela1, Arnold Tapera Kanengoni2,3, Michael Chimonyo1.
Abstract
This paper aims to critically analyse and synthesise existing knowledge concerning the use of environmental enrichment and its effect on behavior, physiology and performance of pigs housed in intensive production systems. The objective is also to provide clarity as to what constitutes successful enrichment and recommend when and how enrichment should be used. Environmental enrichment is usually understood as an attempt to improve animal welfare and to a lesser extent, performance. Common enrichment objects used are straw bedding, suspended ropes and wood shavings, toys, rubber tubings, colored plastic keys, table tennis balls, chains and strings. These substrates need to be chewable, deformable, destructible and ingestible. For enrichment to be successful four goals are essential. Firstly, enrichment should increase the number and range of normal behaviors; secondly, it should prevent the phenomenon of anomalous behaviors or reduce their frequency; thirdly, it should increase positive use of the environment such as space and fourthly it should increase the ability of the animals to deal with behavioral and physiological challenges. The performance, behavior and physiology of pigs in enriched environments is similar or in some cases slightly better when compared with barren environments. In studies where there was no improvement, it should be borne in mind that enriching the environment may not always be practical and yield positive results due to factors such as type of enrichment substrates, duration of provision and type of enrichment used. The review also identifies possible areas that still need further research, especially in understanding the role of enrichment, novelty, breed differences and other enrichment alternatives.Entities:
Keywords: Exploration; Instinctive Behaviours; Intensive Production Systems; Novelty; Pig Welfare
Year: 2018 PMID: 28728387 PMCID: PMC6325398 DOI: 10.5713/ajas.17.0138
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Asian-Australas J Anim Sci ISSN: 1011-2367 Impact factor: 2.509
Effects of different enrichment substrate or materials on behavioral activities
| Material | Behaviour | Effect | References |
|---|---|---|---|
| Peat+straw | Aggression | ↓ | Beattie et al [ |
| Exploration directed towards pen mates | ↓ | ||
| Exploration directed towards materials | ↑ | ||
| Tyres in chains | Aggression | = | Schaefer et al [ |
| Rubber toys | Aggression | ↓ | Schaefer et al [ |
| Chain+bars+rages+tyres (Change once a week) | Exploration | ↑ | Pearce and Paterson [ |
| Deep straw bedding | Aggression | ↓ | Bolhuis et al [ |
| Exploration | ↓ | ||
| Straw bedding | Play behaviour | ↓ | Beattie et al [ |
| Manipulation directed pen mates | ↓ | ||
| Aggression | ↓ | ||
| Exploration directed towards pen mates | ↓ | ||
| Harmful social behaviour | ↓ | ||
| Tethers+metal | Aggression | ↓ | Blackshaw et al [ |
| Mobile+two balls | Aggression | ↓ | Guy et al [ |
| Exploratory+play | ↑ |
Source, [2].
In the column at left the enrichment materials are listed, in the second column the behaviour is listed in the following order; behaviour redirected towards pen mates, aggression, harmful social behaviours e.g. tail biting, behaviour redirected towards materials or substrate, play behaviour. In the effect column, arrows indicate if the relevant behaviour has been increased or reduced, while equal signs indicate if the behaviour was unaffected. If the desired effects have been achieved arrows are pointing downwards, while if the desired effects have not been achieved the arrows are pointing upward.
Carcass characteristics measurements from pigs in different housing environment and using different enrichment types
| Environment+enrichment type | Carcass weight (kg/d) | Backfat (mm) | Carcass length | Meat percentage | SEM | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barren | 73.9 | 77.8 | - | - | 0.91 | Beattie et al [ |
| Enriched | 11.9 | 15.1 | - | - | 0.57 | |
| Control | - | 2.77 | 83.10 | - | - | Hill et al [ |
| Toys | - | 2.51 | 83.10 | - | - | |
| Human | - | 2.69 | 83.39 | - | - | |
| Human+Toys | - | 2.79 | 82.93 | - | - | |
| Negative treatment | - | 2.34 | 83.72 | - | - |
SEM, standard error of the mean.