| Literature DB >> 33562568 |
Kevin Van Tichelen1, Sara Prims1, Miriam Ayuso1, Céline Van Kerschaver2, Mario Vandaele2, Jeroen Degroote2, Steven Van Cruchten1, Joris Michiels2, Chris Van Ginneken1.
Abstract
The increase in litter sizes in recent years has resulted in more low birth weight (LBW) piglets, accompanied by a higher mortality. A potential intervention to overcome this is drenching bioactive substances. However, if the act of drenching provokes additional stress in LBW piglets, it might counteract the supplement's effect and be detrimental for the piglet's survival. To study the effect of the drenching act, piglets from 67 sows were weighed within 4 h after birth. The mean litter birth weight (MLBW) and standard deviation (SD) were calculated. LBW piglets (n = 76) were defined as weighing between (MLBW-1*SD) and (MLBW-2.5*SD). They were randomly allocated to two treatments: "sham" (conducting the act of drenching by inserting an empty 2.5 mL syringe in the mouth during 20 s, once a day, d1 till d7; n = 37) or "no treatment" (no handling; n = 39). On day 1, 3, 9, 24 and 38, piglets were weighed and scored for skin lesions. Blood samples were collected on day 9 and 38 and analyzed to determine glucose, non-esterified fatty acids (NEFA), urea, immunoglobulin G (IgG), insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) and a standard blood panel test. There was no difference between sham drenched and untreated piglets regarding any of the parameters. In conclusion, this study showed that drenching does not impose a significant risk to LBW piglets and can be applied safely during the first 7 days after birth.Entities:
Keywords: management; mortality; neonatal; oral supplementation; performance; pig
Year: 2021 PMID: 33562568 PMCID: PMC7915206 DOI: 10.3390/ani11020404
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Animals (Basel) ISSN: 2076-2615 Impact factor: 2.752