Literature DB >> 33562568

Handling Associated with Drenching Does Not Impact Survival and General Health of Low Birth Weight Piglets.

Kevin Van Tichelen1, Sara Prims1, Miriam Ayuso1, Céline Van Kerschaver2, Mario Vandaele2, Jeroen Degroote2, Steven Van Cruchten1, Joris Michiels2, Chris Van Ginneken1.   

Abstract

The increase in litter sizes in recent years has resulted in more low birth weight (LBW) piglets, accompanied by a higher mortality. A potential intervention to overcome this is drenching bioactive substances. However, if the act of drenching provokes additional stress in LBW piglets, it might counteract the supplement's effect and be detrimental for the piglet's survival. To study the effect of the drenching act, piglets from 67 sows were weighed within 4 h after birth. The mean litter birth weight (MLBW) and standard deviation (SD) were calculated. LBW piglets (n = 76) were defined as weighing between (MLBW-1*SD) and (MLBW-2.5*SD). They were randomly allocated to two treatments: "sham" (conducting the act of drenching by inserting an empty 2.5 mL syringe in the mouth during 20 s, once a day, d1 till d7; n = 37) or "no treatment" (no handling; n = 39). On day 1, 3, 9, 24 and 38, piglets were weighed and scored for skin lesions. Blood samples were collected on day 9 and 38 and analyzed to determine glucose, non-esterified fatty acids (NEFA), urea, immunoglobulin G (IgG), insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) and a standard blood panel test. There was no difference between sham drenched and untreated piglets regarding any of the parameters. In conclusion, this study showed that drenching does not impose a significant risk to LBW piglets and can be applied safely during the first 7 days after birth.

Entities:  

Keywords:  management; mortality; neonatal; oral supplementation; performance; pig

Year:  2021        PMID: 33562568      PMCID: PMC7915206          DOI: 10.3390/ani11020404

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Animals (Basel)        ISSN: 2076-2615            Impact factor:   2.752


  46 in total

1.  Neonatal-piglet weight variation and its relation to pre-weaning mortality and weight gain on commercial farms.

Authors:  Barry N Milligan; Catherine E Dewey; Angel F de Grau
Journal:  Prev Vet Med       Date:  2002-12-18       Impact factor: 2.670

2.  Tail docking in pigs: acute physiological and behavioural responses.

Authors:  M A Sutherland; P J Bryer; N Krebs; J J McGlone
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Investigating the behavioural and physiological indicators of neonatal survival in pigs.

Authors:  E M Baxter; S Jarvis; R B D'Eath; D W Ross; S K Robson; M Farish; I M Nevison; A B Lawrence; S A Edwards
Journal:  Theriogenology       Date:  2008-02-01       Impact factor: 2.740

Review 4.  Nutritional interventions to prevent and rear low-birthweight piglets.

Authors:  M De Vos; L Che; V Huygelen; S Willemen; J Michiels; S Van Cruchten; C Van Ginneken
Journal:  J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl)       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 2.130

5.  Intrauterine growth restricted piglets defined by their head shape ingest insufficient amounts of colostrum.

Authors:  C Amdi; U Krogh; C Flummer; N Oksbjerg; C F Hansen; P K Theil
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 3.159

6.  Risk factors associated with the different categories of piglet perinatal mortality in French farms.

Authors:  F Pandolfi; S A Edwards; F Robert; I Kyriazakis
Journal:  Prev Vet Med       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 2.670

7.  Comparison of myelination between large and small pig fetuses during late gestation.

Authors:  J L Vallet; J R Miles
Journal:  Anim Reprod Sci       Date:  2012-04-13       Impact factor: 2.145

8.  Milk replacers supplemented with either L-arginine or L-carnitine potentially improve muscle maturation of early reared low birth weight piglets from hyperprolific sows.

Authors:  J G Madsen; S Mueller; M Kreuzer; M B Bigler; P Silacci; G Bee
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2017-06-23       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Postnatal piglet husbandry practices and well-being: the effects of alternative techniques delivered separately.

Authors:  J N Marchant-Forde; D C Lay; K A McMunn; H W Cheng; E A Pajor; R M Marchant-Forde
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2008-11-07       Impact factor: 3.159

10.  Glucose and glycogen levels in piglets that differ in birth weight and vitality.

Authors:  Charlotte Vanden Hole; Miriam Ayuso; Peter Aerts; Sara Prims; Steven Van Cruchten; Chris Van Ginneken
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2019-09-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.