| Literature DB >> 28727816 |
Normann Steiner1,2, Roman Hajek3,4, Sabina Sevcikova5,6, Bojana Borjan2,7, Karin Jöhrer7, Georg Göbel8, Gerold Untergasser1,7, Eberhard Gunsilius1,2.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Multiple myeloma (MM) is still incurable due to resistance against various therapies. Thus, the identification of biomarkers predicting progression is urgently needed. Here, we evaluated four biomarkers in bone marrow and peripheral blood of MM patients for their prognostic significance. MATERIALS &Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28727816 PMCID: PMC5519162 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0181487
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Patient demographics and characteristics (n = 73).
| Parameter | MGUS | NDMM | RRMM | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n = 14 | % | n = 42 | % | n = 26 | % | |
| Median age (range), years | 64 (34–81) | 71 (45–89) | 62 (36–78) | |||
| Sex f/m | ||||||
| F | 4 | 29 | 20 | 48 | 13 | 50 |
| M | 10 | 71 | 22 | 52 | 13 | 50 |
| ISS | ||||||
| I | 11 | 26 | 8 | 30 | ||
| II | 8 | 19 | 9 | 35 | ||
| III | 23 | 55 | 9 | 35 | ||
| Type of Ig heavy chain (serum) | ||||||
| IgG | 12 | 86 | 23 | 55 | 18 | 69 |
| IgM | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 8 |
| IgA | 2 | 14 | 8 | 19 | 2 | 8 |
| IgD | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Light chain only | 0 | 0 | 10 | 24 | 4 | 15 |
| Type of Ig light chain (serum) | ||||||
| Kappa | 7 | 50 | 26 | 62 | 15 | 58 |
| Lambda | 7 | 50 | 16 | 38 | 11 | 42 |
| β-2 microglobulin >UNV | 8 | 62 | 32 | 82 | 19 | 73 |
| LDH >UNV | 4 | 29 | 10 | 24 | 7 | 27 |
| Creatinine ≥1.3 mg/dl | 10 | 71 | 26 | 62 | 12 | 44 |
| Serum calcium >UNV | 0 | 0 | 8 | 19 | 2 | 8 |
| Hemoglobin ≤12 g/dl | 7 | 50 | 34 | 81 | 18 | 69 |
| Platelets <100,000/mm3 | 2 | 14 | 8 | 20 | 12 | 46 |
| Osteolytic bone lesions | 1 | 7 | 33 | 79 | 26 | 100 |
| Cytogenetic standard risk | 4 | 29 | 22 | 52 | 5 | 19 |
| Cytogenetic high risk | 1 | 7 | 15 | 36 | 14 | 54 |
| Cytogenetic not available | 9 | 64 | 5 | 12 | 7 | 27 |
| Therapy lines at samples collection | ||||||
| 1st line | 0 | 0 | ||||
| 2nd line | 5 | 19 | ||||
| 3rd line | 10 | 39 | ||||
| 4th line | 4 | 15 | ||||
| 5th line | 2 | 8 | ||||
| 6th line | 4 | 15 | ||||
| 7th line | 1 | 4 | ||||
| BTZ based therapy | 20 | 77 | ||||
| IMiD based therapy | 6 | 23 | ||||
N, number of patients; ISS, International staging system; Ig, Immunoglobulin; UNV, upper normal value; LDH, lactatedehydrogenasis; IMiD, Immunomodulatory drugs; BTZ, Bortezomib
Fig 1Expression of soluble TIE2, FLT3-L, endostatin, and osteoactivin in bone marrow and peripheral blood of MGUS, NDMM and RRMM patients.
(A) Soluble TIE2. (B) FLT3-L. (C) Endostatin. (D) Osteoactivin.
Soluble TIE2 and FLT3-L expression levels from bone marrow (BM) and peripheral blood (PB) correlated with MGUS, NDMM and RRMM patients.
| Control P (n = 16) | 5638.37 | 4799.26–6095.14 | 4706.64–6245.47 | |
| NDMM BM (n = 42) | 861.98 | 393.22–1533.42 | 341.46–1829.64 | |
| NDMM PB (n = 31) | 5368.25 | 4938.70–5669.45 | 4644.90–5962.00 | |
| RRMM BM (n = 27) | 2223.26 | 740.09–2919.40 | 562.43–3148.80 | |
| RRMM PB (n = 16) | 5787.12 | 5166.65–6470.97 | 5120.22–6496.36 | |
| All patients BM (83) | 1353.05 | 739.59–2223.26 | 430.27–3386.15 | P<0.001 |
| Control P (n = 16) | 67.17 | 55.52–76.40 | 55.03–80.98 | |
| NDMM BM (n = 42) | 63.15 | 52.48–82.74 | 45.11–114.08 | |
| NDMM PB (n = 31) | 85.05 | 61.92–103.90 | 45.25–116.70 | |
| RRMM BM (n = 27) | 122.00 | 93.80–140.77 | 80.25–174.90 | |
| RRMM PB (n = 16) | 160.47 | 124–199.05 | 118.37–216.41 | |
| All patients BM (83) | 77.25 | 63.0–100.45 | 48.75–128.19 | P<0.001 |
MGUS, monoclonal gammopathy undetermined significance; MM, multiple
Myeloma; NDMM, newly diagnosed multiple myeloma; RRMM, relapsed refractory multiple myeloma; [95% CI], Confidence interval; IQR, Interquartile range; Control P, control person
Endostatin and osteoactivin expression levels from bone marrow (BM) and peripheral blood (PB) correlated with MGUS, NDMM and RRMM patients.
| Control P (n = 16) | 83.70 | 77.35–92.60 | 76.37–94.70 | |
| NDMM BM (n = 42) | 170.15 | 144.45–198.05 | 130.07–213.10 | |
| NDMM PB (n = 31) | 172.05 | 148.85–191.18 | 132.45–205.95 | |
| RRMM BM (n = 27) | 146.50 | 121.85–169.55 | 100.14–181.63 | |
| RRMM PB (n = 16) | 139.17 | 119.55–190.90 | 118.05–206.95 | |
| All patients BM (83) | 165.40 | 146.50–185.25 | 124.25–209.30 | P = 0.2 |
| Control P (n = 16) | 24.74 | 21.82–29.12 | 20.71–29.12 | |
| NDMM BM (n = 42) | 24.92 | 21.55–27.04 | 19.83–28.62 | |
| NDMM PB (n = 31) | 28.70 | 25.01–34.70 | 19.35–37.80 | |
| RRMM BM (n = 27) | 22.30 | 20.05–25.75 | 18.30–26.50 | |
| RRMM PB (n = 16) | 29.45 | 23.47–44.21 | 20.23–47.40 | |
| All patients BM (83) | 24.80 | 22.15–26.85 | 20.10–33.30 | P = 0.007 |
MGUS, monoclonal gammopathy undetermined significance; MM, multiple
Myeloma; NDMM, newly diagnosed multiple myeloma; RRMM, relapsed refractory
multiple myeloma; [95% CI], Confidence interval; IQR, Interquartile range; Control P, control person
Fig 2Receiver Operating Curve (ROC) analyses for bone marrow- (BM) and peripheral blood (PB) plasma soluble TIE2, FLT3-L, endostatin and osteoactivin to differentiate MGUS, NDMM and RRMM patients.
(A) Soluble TIE2. (B) FLT3-L. (C) Endostatin. (D) Osteoactivin. AUC, Area under the Curve; BM, bone marrow; PB, peripheral blood.
Receiver Operating Curve analyses (ROC) and Area under the Curve (AUC) for bone marrow- (BM) and peripheral blood (PB) plasma soluble TIE2, FLT3-L, endostatin and osteoactivin in MGUS, NDMM and RRMM patients.
| Soluble TIE2 | FLT-3 | Endostatin | Osteoactivin | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.45 [0.27–0.63]; | 0.56 [0.38–0.74]; P = 0.5 | |||
| optimal Threshold / Cut-off value | pos if < 3753 pg/ml | n.c | n.c | pos if < 28.7 ng/ml |
| Sens / Spec | 91% / 71% | n.c | n.c | 76% / 79% |
| ppV /npV | 91% / 71% | n.c | n.c | 91% / 52% |
| 0.6 [0.46–0.74]; | 0.56 [0.42–0.71]; P = 0.4 | |||
| optimal Threshold / Cut-off value | n.c | pos if > 92 pg/ml | n.c | n.c |
| Sens / Spec | n.c | 70% / 71% | n.c | n.c |
| ppV /npV | n.c | 61% / 79% | n.c | n.c |
| 0.66 [0.50–0.81]; P = 0.07 | 0.59 [0.41–0.77]; | 0.45 [0.26–0.63]; P = 0.5 | ||
| optimal Threshold / Cut-off value | n.c | pos if > 121 pg/ml | n.c | n.c |
| Sens / Spec | n.c | 76% / 84% | n.c | n.c |
| ppV /npV | n.c | 71% / 87% | n.c | n.c |
ROC, Receiver Operating Curve; AUC, Area under the Curve; Spec, Specifity; Sens, Sensitivity; positive predictive value, ppV; negative predictive value, npV; MGUS, monoclonal gammopathy undetermined significance; NDMM, newly diagnosed multiple myeloma; RRMM, relapsed refractory multiple myeloma; [95% CI], Confidence interval; n.c., not calculated. Threshold, sensitivity/specifity and predictive value were calculated for signifycant Area under the Curves (AUCs) using Youden's approach.