Literature DB >> 28721700

Blood pressure-lowering efficacy of indapamide SR/amlodipine combination in older patients with hypertension: A post hoc analysis of the NESTOR trial (Natrilix SR vs Enalapril in Hypertensive Type 2 Diabetics With Microalbuminuria).

Olivier Hanon1,2, Laure Caillard1,2, Edouard Chaussade1,2, Intza Hernandorena1,2, Clemence Boully1,2.   

Abstract

To examine the antihypertensive efficacy and safety of indapamide sustained-release (SR)/amlodipine compared with enalapril/amlodipine in patients 65 years and older with uncontrolled blood pressure (BP) on monotherapy, a post hoc analysis of the NESTOR trial (Natrilix SR vs Enalapril in Hypertensive Type 2 Diabetics With Microalbuminuria) was conducted. NESTOR randomized 570 patients (n=197, aged ≥65 years) with hypertension (systolic BP 140-180/diastolic BP <110 mm Hg) to indapamide SR 1.5 mg or enalapril 10 mg. If target BP (<140/85 mm Hg) was not achieved at 6 weeks, amlodipine 5 mg was added with uptitration to 10 mg if required. A total of 107 patients aged 65 years and older received dual therapy (53 indapamide SR/amlodipine and 54 enalapril/amlodipine). Amlodipine uptitration occurred in 22 and 24 patients, respectively. At 52 weeks, mean systolic BP (±SE) reduction was significantly greater with indapamide SR/amlodipine vs enalapril/amlodipine 6.2±2.7 mm Hg (P=.02). Indapamide SR/amlodipine was also associated with a greater BP response rate (88% vs 75%, respectively). Both regimens were well tolerated. Indapamide SR/amlodipine may be more effective than enalapril/amlodipine for lowering systolic BP in patients with hypertension aged 65 years and older. ©2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  elderly; hypertension; indapamide SR/amlodipine combination; systolic blood pressure

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28721700      PMCID: PMC8030879          DOI: 10.1111/jch.13053

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)        ISSN: 1524-6175            Impact factor:   3.738


  39 in total

1.  Age-related difference in the sleep pressure-lowering effect between an angiotensin II receptor blocker and a calcium channel blocker in Asian hypertensives: the ACS1 Study.

Authors:  Kazuomi Kario; Satoshi Hoshide
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2015-02-02       Impact factor: 10.190

Review 2.  Outcomes of Intensive Blood Pressure Lowering in Older Hypertensive Patients.

Authors:  Chirag Bavishi; Sripal Bangalore; Franz H Messerli
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2017-02-07       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 3.  Effects of different regimens to lower blood pressure on major cardiovascular events in older and younger adults: meta-analysis of randomised trials.

Authors:  F Turnbull; B Neal; T Ninomiya; C Algert; H Arima; F Barzi; C Bulpitt; J Chalmers; R Fagard; A Gleason; S Heritier; N Li; V Perkovic; M Woodward; S MacMahon
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2008-05-14

4.  Evidence supporting a systolic blood pressure goal of less than 150 mm Hg in patients aged 60 years or older: the minority view.

Authors:  Jackson T Wright; Lawrence J Fine; Daniel T Lackland; Gbenga Ogedegbe; Cheryl R Dennison Himmelfarb
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  Prevention of stroke by antihypertensive drug treatment in older persons with isolated systolic hypertension. Final results of the Systolic Hypertension in the Elderly Program (SHEP). SHEP Cooperative Research Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1991-06-26       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  A comparison of indapamide SR 1.5 mg with both amlodipine 5 mg and hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg in elderly hypertensive patients: a randomized double-blind controlled study.

Authors:  J P Emeriau; H Knauf; J O Pujadas; C Calvo-Gomez; G Abate; G Leonetti; C Chastang
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.844

7.  ACCF/AHA 2011 expert consensus document on hypertension in the elderly: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus documents developed in collaboration with the American Academy of Neurology, American Geriatrics Society, American Society for Preventive Cardiology, American Society of Hypertension, American Society of Nephrology, Association of Black Cardiologists, and European Society of Hypertension.

Authors:  Wilbert S Aronow; Jerome L Fleg; Carl J Pepine; Nancy T Artinian; George Bakris; Alan S Brown; Keith C Ferdinand; Mary Ann Forciea; William H Frishman; Cheryl Jaigobin; John B Kostis; Giuseppi Mancia; Suzanne Oparil; Eduardo Ortiz; Efrain Reisin; Michael W Rich; Douglas D Schocken; Michael A Weber; Deborah J Wesley
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2011-04-26       Impact factor: 24.094

8.  Equivalence of indapamide SR and enalapril on microalbuminuria reduction in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes: the NESTOR Study.

Authors:  Michel Marre; Juan Garcia Puig; Franciszek Kokot; Margarita Fernandez; György Jermendy; Lionel Opie; Valentin Moyseev; André Scheen; Constantin Ionescu-Tirgoviste; M Helena Saldanha; Aaron Halabe; Bryan Williams; Decio Mion Júnior; Maximino Ruiz; Kjeld Hermansen; Jaakko Tuomilehto; Bartolomé Finizola; Yves Gallois; Philippe Amouyel; Jean-Pierre Ollivier; Roland Asmar
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.844

Review 9.  Salt sensitivity of blood pressure in humans.

Authors:  M H Weinberger
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 10.190

10.  Blood pressure control with a single-pill combination of indapamide sustained-release and amlodipine in patients with hypertension: the EFFICIENT study.

Authors:  Uday Jadhav; Jagdish Hiremath; Deepak J Namjoshi; Vinod K Gujral; Kamlakar K Tripathi; Mohammad Siraj; Paramesh Shamanna; Michel Safar
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-08       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

1.  Blood pressure-lowering efficacy of indapamide SR/amlodipine combination in older patients with hypertension: A post hoc analysis of the NESTOR trial (Natrilix SR vs Enalapril in Hypertensive Type 2 Diabetics With Microalbuminuria).

Authors:  Olivier Hanon; Laure Caillard; Edouard Chaussade; Intza Hernandorena; Clemence Boully
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 3.738

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.