Literature DB >> 24438553

Esophageal anastomosis.

Y Yuan1, K-N Wang, L-Q Chen.   

Abstract

This review gives an overview of the esophageal anastomosis. The history, various techniques and substitution organs, their advantages and disadvantages, healing mechanism, complications, and actual trend of this essential part of esophageal surgery are described. The history of the esophageal anastomosis extending from the first anastomosis in 1901 to today has undergone more than one century. In the early days, the success rate of the anastomosis was extremely low. As the technology progressed, the anastomosis got significant achievement. Various anastomotic techniques are currently being used. However, controversies exist on the choice of anastomotic method concerning the success rate, postoperative complication and quality of life. How to choose the method, no one can give the best answer. We searched the manuscripts about the esophageal anastomoses in recent years and studied the controversy questions about the anastomosis. Performing an esophageal anastomosis is a technical matter, and suture healing is independent of the patient's biologic situation. Every anastomosis technique has its own merit, but the outcomes were different if it was performed by different surgeons, and we also found that the complication rate of the anastomosis was mainly associated with the surgeons. So the surgeons should learn from their previous experience and others to avoid technical errors.
© 2014 International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus.

Entities:  

Keywords:  anastomosis; esophageal replacement; esophageal substitution; esophagectomy

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24438553     DOI: 10.1111/dote.12171

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Esophagus        ISSN: 1120-8694            Impact factor:   3.429


  5 in total

1.  Modified Double-Layer Anastomosis for Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: An Effective Way to Prevent Leakage and Stricture.

Authors:  Yong Yuan; Xiao-Xi Zeng; Yong-Fan Zhao; Long-Qi Chen
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Logistic regression analysis of the risk factors of anastomotic fistula after radical resection of esophageal-cardiac cancer.

Authors:  Jinxi Huang; Yi Zhou; Chenghu Wang; Weiwei Yuan; Zhandong Zhang; Beibei Chen; Xiefu Zhang
Journal:  Thorac Cancer       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 3.500

3.  Successful management of traumatic cervical esophageal injury by intraoperative microscopy and esophagoscopic assistance: a case description.

Authors:  Yan Chen; Yukun Jia; Zhan Peng; Jie Chen; Zhiwu Lv; Guangye Wang
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2022-09

4.  Anastomotic reinforcement with omentoplasty reduces anastomotic leakage for minimally invasive esophagectomy with cervical anastomosis.

Authors:  Dong Zhou; Quan-Xing Liu; Xu-Feng Deng; Hong Zheng; Xiao Lu; Ji-Gang Dai; Li Jiang
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2018-02-07       Impact factor: 3.989

5.  A Retrospective Review of a Single-Center Experience with Posterolateral Fundoplication During Esophagogastrostomy After Proximal Gastrectomy.

Authors:  Masaki Aizawa; Hiroshi Yabusaki; Koji Nakada; Atsushi Matsuki; Takeo Bamba; Satoru Nakagawa
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 3.452

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.