AIM: The aim of this study was to analyze the results of nonoperative management of patients with perforated acute diverticulitis with extraluminal air and to identify risk factors that may lead to failure and necessity of surgery. METHODS: Methods included observational retrospective cohort study of patients between 2010 and 2015 with diagnosis of diverticulitis with extraluminal air and with nonoperative management initial. Patient demographics, clinical, and analytical data were collected, as were data related with computed tomography. Univariate and multivariate analyses with Wald forward stepwise logistic regression were performed to analyze results and to identify risk factors potentially responsible of failure of nonoperative management. RESULTS: Nonoperative management was established in 83.12% of patients diagnosed with perforated diverticulitis (64 of 77) with an overall success rate of 84.37%, a mean hospital stay of 11.98 ± 7.44 days and only one mortality (1.6%). Patients with pericolic air presented a greater chance of success (90.2%) than patients with distant air (61.5%). American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade III-IV (OR, 5.49; 95% CI, 1.04-29.07) and the distant location of air (OR, 4.81; 95% CI, 1.03-22.38) were the only two factors identified in the multivariate analysis as risk factors for a poor nonoperative treatment outcome. Overall recurrence after conservative approach was 20.4%; however, recurrence rate of patients with distant air was twice than that of patients with pericolic air (37.5 vs 17.39%). Only 14.8% of successfully treated patients required surgery after the first episode. CONCLUSION: Nonoperative management of perforated diverticulitis is safe and efficient. Special follow-up must be assumed in patients ASA III-IV and with distant air in CT.
AIM: The aim of this study was to analyze the results of nonoperative management of patients with perforated acute diverticulitis with extraluminal air and to identify risk factors that may lead to failure and necessity of surgery. METHODS: Methods included observational retrospective cohort study of patients between 2010 and 2015 with diagnosis of diverticulitis with extraluminal air and with nonoperative management initial. Patient demographics, clinical, and analytical data were collected, as were data related with computed tomography. Univariate and multivariate analyses with Wald forward stepwise logistic regression were performed to analyze results and to identify risk factors potentially responsible of failure of nonoperative management. RESULTS: Nonoperative management was established in 83.12% of patients diagnosed with perforated diverticulitis (64 of 77) with an overall success rate of 84.37%, a mean hospital stay of 11.98 ± 7.44 days and only one mortality (1.6%). Patients with pericolic air presented a greater chance of success (90.2%) than patients with distant air (61.5%). American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade III-IV (OR, 5.49; 95% CI, 1.04-29.07) and the distant location of air (OR, 4.81; 95% CI, 1.03-22.38) were the only two factors identified in the multivariate analysis as risk factors for a poor nonoperative treatment outcome. Overall recurrence after conservative approach was 20.4%; however, recurrence rate of patients with distant air was twice than that of patients with pericolic air (37.5 vs 17.39%). Only 14.8% of successfully treated patients required surgery after the first episode. CONCLUSION: Nonoperative management of perforated diverticulitis is safe and efficient. Special follow-up must be assumed in patientsASA III-IV and with distant air in CT.
Authors: Sekhar Dharmarajan; Steven R Hunt; Elisa H Birnbaum; James W Fleshman; Matthew G Mutch Journal: Dis Colon Rectum Date: 2011-06 Impact factor: 4.585
Authors: Sandra Vennix; Gijsbert D Musters; Irene M Mulder; Hilko A Swank; Esther C Consten; Eric H Belgers; Anna A van Geloven; Michael F Gerhards; Marc J Govaert; Wilhelmina M van Grevenstein; Anton G Hoofwijk; Philip M Kruyt; Simon W Nienhuijs; Marja A Boermeester; Jefrey Vermeulen; Susan van Dieren; Johan F Lange; Willem A Bemelman Journal: Lancet Date: 2015-07-22 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Massimo Sartelli; Fausto Catena; Luca Ansaloni; Federico Coccolini; Ewen A Griffiths; Fikri M Abu-Zidan; Salomone Di Saverio; Jan Ulrych; Yoram Kluger; Ofir Ben-Ishay; Frederick A Moore; Rao R Ivatury; Raul Coimbra; Andrew B Peitzman; Ari Leppaniemi; Gustavo P Fraga; Ronald V Maier; Osvaldo Chiara; Jeffry Kashuk; Boris Sakakushev; Dieter G Weber; Rifat Latifi; Walter Biffl; Miklosh Bala; Aleksandar Karamarkovic; Kenji Inaba; Carlos A Ordonez; Andreas Hecker; Goran Augustin; Zaza Demetrashvili; Renato Bessa Melo; Sanjay Marwah; Sanoop K Zachariah; Vishal G Shelat; Michael McFarlane; Miran Rems; Carlos Augusto Gomes; Mario Paulo Faro; Gerson Alves Pereira Júnior; Ionut Negoi; Yunfeng Cui; Norio Sato; Andras Vereczkei; Giovanni Bellanova; Arianna Birindelli; Isidoro Di Carlo; Kenneth Y Kok; Mahir Gachabayov; Georgios Gkiokas; Konstantinos Bouliaris; Elif Çolak; Arda Isik; Daniel Rios-Cruz; Rodolfo Soto; Ernest E Moore Journal: World J Emerg Surg Date: 2016-07-29 Impact factor: 5.469
Authors: Johan Friso Lock; Christian Galata; Christoph Reißfelder; Jörg-Peter Ritz; Thomas Schiedeck; Christoph-Thomas Germer Journal: Dtsch Arztebl Int Date: 2020-08-31 Impact factor: 5.594
Authors: Taeyoung Yoo; Keun Ho Yang; Jungbin Kim; Inseok Park; Hyunjin Cho; Geumhee Gwak; Byung Noe Bae; Ki Hwan Kim Journal: Ann Coloproctol Date: 2018-02-28
Authors: H E Bolkenstein; S T van Dijk; E C J Consten; B G F Heggelman; C M A Hoeks; I A M J Broeders; M A Boermeester; W A Draaisma Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2019-03-11 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: R Nascimbeni; A Amato; R Cirocchi; A Serventi; A Laghi; M Bellini; G Tellan; M Zago; C Scarpignato; G A Binda Journal: Tech Coloproctol Date: 2020-11-05 Impact factor: 3.781