Literature DB >> 23402348

Evaluation of preoperative measurement of stone surface area as a predictor of stone-free status after combined ureteroscopy with holmium laser lithotripsy: a single-center experience.

Hiroki Ito1, Takashi Kawahara, Hideyuki Terao, Takehiko Ogawa, Masahiro Yao, Yoshinobu Kubota, Junichi Matsuzaki.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the utility and limitations of stone surface area (SA) as a predictor of stone-free (SF) status after a single semirigid ureteroscopy (URS), with or without a flexible component, for the treatment of patients with urinary stones. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Cases of patients with urinary stones treated by combined URS with holmium laser lithotripsy at a single institute were retrospectively evaluated. Correlations of possible predictors with SF status were analyzed using a logistic regression model. Two types of SA were measured: "Traced stone surface area" (tSA) and "calculated stone surface area" (cSA).
RESULTS: According to the univariate analysis, the following variables were significantly associated with non-SF status: Stone number (P<0.001), ureteral stone location (P=0.045), presence of renal stones (P<0.001), tSA (P<0.001), cSA (P<0.001), stone volume (P<0.001), and operator experience (P=0.02). According to multivariate analysis, stone volume (P=0.016) was an independent predictor of SF status. The scatter diagrams for tSA and cSA showed strong correlations between these parameters, and Spearman ρ was 0.975.
CONCLUSIONS: Stone volume and SA were highly indicative of stone status after single semirigid URS, with or without a flexible component. The formula for cSA, maximum diameter×width×π×1/4, was demonstrated to accurately represent SA in this study. SA, however, indicated a lower clinical priority and utility as a predictor of stone status than stone volume. The combination of semirigid and flexible URS could access any ureteral stones, including those that semirigid URS alone could not treat. The cutoff points for these predictors of outcome were 110.0 mm(2) for cSA, 125.0 mm(2) for tSA, and 840.0 mm(3) for stone volume.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23402348     DOI: 10.1089/end.2012.0548

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  9 in total

1.  Single session vs two sessions of flexible ureterosopy (FURS) for dusting of renal pelvic stones 2-3 cm in diameter: Does stone size or hardness play a role in number of sessions to be applied?"

Authors:  Ahmed Mamdouh Abd El Hamed; Hazem Elmoghazy; Mohamed Aldahshoury; Ahmed Riad; Mohammed Mostafa; Fawzy Farag; Wael Gamal
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2017-05-03

2.  Decision-making and improvements in health-related quality of life in patients with kidney stones: comparing surgery versus observation using a mixed methods analysis.

Authors:  Connor M Forbes; Kemberlee Bonnet; Tracy Bryant; David G Schlundt; Kerri L Cavanaugh; Ryan S Hsi
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 2.861

Review 3.  Pushing the boundaries of ureteroscopy: current status and future perspectives.

Authors:  Petrisor Geavlete; Razvan Multescu; Bogdan Geavlete
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2014-06-03       Impact factor: 14.432

4.  Increasing the size of ureteral access sheath during retrograde intrarenal surgery improves surgical efficiency without increasing complications.

Authors:  Chad R Tracy; George M Ghareeb; Charles J Paul; Nathan A Brooks
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-01-27       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Optimizing Stone-free Rates With Ureteroscopy.

Authors:  Thanmaya G Reddy; Dean G Assimos
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2015

6.  Lower pole anatomy and mid-renal-zone classification applied to flexible ureteroscopy: experimental study using human three-dimensional endocasts.

Authors:  Bruno Marroig; Luciano Alves Favorito; Marco A Fortes; Francisco J B Sampaio
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2015-06-05       Impact factor: 1.246

7.  Do Hypertension, diabetes mellitus and obesity increase the risk of severity of nephrolithiasis?

Authors:  Eyup Burak Sancak; Mustafa Reşorlu; Alpaslan Akbas; Murat Tolga Gulpinar; Muhammet Arslan; Berkan Resorlu
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 1.088

8.  Outcome from 5-year live surgical demonstrations in urinary stone treatment: are outcomes compromised?

Authors:  Jaap D Legemate; Stefano P Zanetti; Joyce Baard; Guido M Kamphuis; Emanuele Montanari; Olivier Traxer; Jean Jmch de la Rosette
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 4.226

9.  Lower pole anatomy of horseshoe kidney and complete ureteral duplication: Anatomic and radiologic study applied to endourology.

Authors:  Sobrinho U L G P Sobrinho; Francisco J B Sampaio; Luciano A Favorito
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2022 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.050

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.