Literature DB >> 28972126

Dynamic Trial-by-Trial Recoding of Task-Set Representations in the Frontoparietal Cortex Mediates Behavioral Flexibility.

Lei Qiao1, Lijie Zhang1, Antao Chen2, Tobias Egner3.   

Abstract

Cognitive flexibility forms the core of the extraordinary ability of humans to adapt, but the precise neural mechanisms underlying our ability to nimbly shift between task sets remain poorly understood. Recent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies employing multivoxel pattern analysis (MVPA) have shown that a currently relevant task set can be decoded from activity patterns in the frontoparietal cortex, but whether these regions support the dynamic transformation of task sets from trial to trial is not clear. Here, we combined a cued task-switching protocol with human (both sexes) fMRI, and harnessed representational similarity analysis (RSA) to facilitate a novel assessment of trial-by-trial changes in neural task-set representations. We first used MVPA to define task-sensitive frontoparietal and visual regions and found that neural task-set representations on switch trials are less stably encoded than on repeat trials. We then exploited RSA to show that the neural representational pattern dissimilarity across consecutive trials is greater for switch trials than for repeat trials, and that the degree of this pattern dissimilarity predicts behavior. Moreover, the overall neural pattern of representational dissimilarities followed from the assumption that repeating sets, compared with switching sets, results in stronger neural task representations. Finally, when moving from cue to target phase within a trial, pattern dissimilarities tracked the transformation from previous-trial task representations to the currently relevant set. These results provide neural evidence for the longstanding assumptions of an effortful task-set reconfiguration process hampered by task-set inertia, and they demonstrate that frontoparietal and stimulus processing regions support "dynamic adaptive coding," flexibly representing changing task sets in a trial-by-trial fashion.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Humans can fluently switch between different tasks, reflecting an ability to dynamically configure "task sets," rule representations that link stimuli to appropriate responses. Recent studies show that neural signals in frontal and parietal brain regions can tell us which of two tasks a person is currently performing. However, it is not known whether these regions are also involved in dynamically reconfiguring task-set representations when switching between tasks. Here we measured human brain activity during task switching and tracked the similarity of neural task-set representations from trial to trial. We show that frontal and parietal brain regions flexibly recode changing task sets in a trial-by-trial fashion, and that task-set similarity over consecutive trials predicts behavior.
Copyright © 2017 the authors 0270-6474/17/3711037-14$15.00/0.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cognitive control; cognitive flexibility; fMRI; frontoparietal cortex; representational similarity analysis; task switching

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28972126      PMCID: PMC5678027          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0935-17.2017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  43 in total

1.  Modeling cognitive control in task-switching.

Authors:  N Meiran
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2000

2.  The role of the frontal cortex in task preparation.

Authors:  Marcel Brass; D Yves von Cramon
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 3.  The human visual cortex.

Authors:  Kalanit Grill-Spector; Rafael Malach
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 12.449

4.  Measuring functional connectivity during distinct stages of a cognitive task.

Authors:  Jesse Rissman; Adam Gazzaley; Mark D'Esposito
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 5.  Decoding mental states from brain activity in humans.

Authors:  John-Dylan Haynes; Geraint Rees
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 34.870

6.  Affective modulation of cognitive control is determined by performance-contingency and mediated by ventromedial prefrontal and cingulate cortex.

Authors:  Senne Braem; Joseph A King; Franziska M Korb; Ruth M Krebs; Wim Notebaert; Tobias Egner
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-10-23       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Training conquers multitasking costs by dividing task representations in the frontoparietal-subcortical system.

Authors:  K G Garner; Paul E Dux
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-10-12       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Optimization of experimental design in fMRI: a general framework using a genetic algorithm.

Authors:  Tor D Wager; Thomas E Nichols
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Reward Motivation Enhances Task Coding in Frontoparietal Cortex.

Authors:  Joset A Etzel; Michael W Cole; Jeffrey M Zacks; Kendrick N Kay; Todd S Braver
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2015-01-19       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 10.  Representational geometry: integrating cognition, computation, and the brain.

Authors:  Nikolaus Kriegeskorte; Rogier A Kievit
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2013-07-19       Impact factor: 20.229

View more
  13 in total

1.  Atlas-Based Classification Algorithms for Identification of Informative Brain Regions in fMRI Data.

Authors:  Juan E Arco; Paloma Díaz-Gutiérrez; Javier Ramírez; María Ruz
Journal:  Neuroinformatics       Date:  2020-04

2.  Contextual Adaptation of Cognitive Flexibility is driven by Task- and Item-Level Learning.

Authors:  Audrey Siqi-Liu; Tobias Egner
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 3.282

3.  Task-evoked pupillary responses track effort exertion: Evidence from task-switching.

Authors:  Kevin da Silva Castanheira; Sophia LoParco; A Ross Otto
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2020-10-20       Impact factor: 3.282

4.  Bottom-Up and Top-Down Factors Differentially Influence Stimulus Representations Across Large-Scale Attentional Networks.

Authors:  Nicole M Long; Brice A Kuhl
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-02-02       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Integrated externally and internally generated task predictions jointly guide cognitive control in prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  Jiefeng Jiang; Anthony D Wagner; Tobias Egner
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2018-08-16       Impact factor: 8.140

6.  Both default and multiple-demand regions represent semantic goal information.

Authors:  Xiuyi Wang; Zhiyao Gao; Jonathan Smallwood; Elizabeth Jefferies
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Cross-Hemispheric Complementary Prefrontal Mechanisms during Task Switching under Perceptual Uncertainty.

Authors:  Kaho Tsumura; Ryuta Aoki; Masaki Takeda; Kiyoshi Nakahara; Koji Jimura
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-01-19       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Neural Dynamics of Context-sensitive Adjustments in Cognitive Flexibility.

Authors:  Audrey Siqi-Liu; Tobias Egner; Marty G Woldorff
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 3.420

Review 9.  Neural Coding of Cognitive Control: The Representational Similarity Analysis Approach.

Authors:  Michael C Freund; Joset A Etzel; Todd S Braver
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 24.482

10.  Context-Dependence and Context-Invariance in the Neural Coding of Intentional Action.

Authors:  David Wisniewski
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-11-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.