Literature DB >> 26788895

Measurement Model Quality, Sample Size, and Solution Propriety in Confirmatory Factor Models.

Phill Gagne, Gregory R Hancock.   

Abstract

Sample size recommendations in confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) have recently shifted away from observations per variable or per parameter toward consideration of model quality. Extending research by Marsh, Hau, Balla, and Grayson (1998), simulations were conducted to determine the extent to which CFA model convergence and parameter estimation are affected by n as well as by construct reliability, which is a measure of measurement model quality derived from the number of indicators per factor (p/f) and factor loading magnitude. Results indicated that model convergence and accuracy of parameter estimation were affected by n and by construct reliability within levels of n. Sample size recommendations for applied researchers using CFA are presented herein as a function of relevant design characteristics.

Entities:  

Year:  2006        PMID: 26788895     DOI: 10.1207/s15327906mbr4101_5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res        ISSN: 0027-3171            Impact factor:   5.923


  26 in total

1.  Bayesian Estimation for Item Factor Analysis Models with Sparse Categorical Indicators.

Authors:  Sierra A Bainter
Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 5.923

2.  Individual differences in object recognition.

Authors:  Jennifer J Richler; Andrew J Tomarken; Mackenzie A Sunday; Timothy J Vickery; Kaitlin F Ryan; R Jackie Floyd; David Sheinberg; Alan C-N Wong; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 8.934

3.  Dimensional structure of the demand control support questionnaire: a Brazilian context.

Authors:  Yara Hahr Marques Hökerberg; Odaleia Barbosa Aguiar; Michael Reichenheim; Eduardo Faerstein; Joaquim Gonçalves Valente; Maria de Jesus Fonseca; Sonia Regina Lambert Passos
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2009-11-26       Impact factor: 3.015

4.  Dietary Influence on Calcitropic Hormones and Adiposity in Caucasian and African American Postmenopausal Women Assessed by Structural Equation Modeling (SEM).

Authors:  J L Lemacks; J Z Ilich; P-Y Liu; H Shin; P A Ralston; M Cui; K A S Wickrama
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 4.075

5.  The Role of Measurement Quality on Practical Guidelines for Assessing Measurement and Structural Invariance.

Authors:  Yoonjeong Kang; Daniel M McNeish; Gregory R Hancock
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 2.821

6.  The unity and diversity of executive functions: A systematic review and re-analysis of latent variable studies.

Authors:  Justin E Karr; Corson N Areshenkoff; Philippe Rast; Scott M Hofer; Grant L Iverson; Mauricio A Garcia-Barrera
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2018-08-06       Impact factor: 17.737

7.  New Developments in Factor Score Regression: Fit Indices and a Model Comparison Test.

Authors:  Ines Devlieger; Wouter Talloen; Yves Rosseel
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2019-05-03       Impact factor: 2.821

8.  Using Structural Equation Modeling to Assess Functional Connectivity in the Brain: Power and Sample Size Considerations.

Authors:  Georgios Sideridis; Panagiotis Simos; Andrew Papanicolaou; Jack Fletcher
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 2.821

9.  The factorial structure of the Suicide Intent Scale: a comparative study in clinical samples from 11 European regions.

Authors:  E Antretter; D Dunkel; C Haring; P Corcoran; D De Leo; S Fekete; K Hawton; A J F M Kerkhof; J Lönnqvist; E Salander Renberg; A Schmidtke; K Van Heeringen; D Wasserman
Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.035

10.  Depression and anxiety symptoms in mothers of newborns hospitalized on the neonatal intensive care unit.

Authors:  Lisa S Segre; Jennifer E McCabe; Rebecca Chuffo-Siewert; Michael W O'Hara
Journal:  Nurs Res       Date:  2014 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.381

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.