Navneet Singh1, Alan R Moody2, Bowen Zhang1, Isabella Kaminski1, Kush Kapur1, Stephanie Chiu1, Pascal N Tyrrell1. 1. From the Department of Medical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine (N.S., A.R.M., B.Z., I.K., S.C., P.N.T.) and Department of Statistical Sciences (P.N.T.), University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada; and Department of Neurology, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, MA (K.K.). 2. From the Department of Medical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine (N.S., A.R.M., B.Z., I.K., S.C., P.N.T.) and Department of Statistical Sciences (P.N.T.), University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada; and Department of Neurology, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, MA (K.K.). alan.moody@sunnybrook.ca.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Stroke rates are higher in men compared with women in the fourth through seventh decades of life, and higher rates may result from differences in carotid intraplaque hemorrhage (IPH), an unstable atherosclerotic plaque component. We report age-specific sex differences in the presence of magnetic resonance imaging-depicted carotid IPH. METHODS: Patients (n=1115) underwent magnetic resonance imaging for carotid IPH between 2005 and 2014. Low-grade carotid stenosis patients (n=906) without prior endarterectomy were eligible for this cross-sectional study. RESULTS: Of the 906 patients included (mean age±SD in years, 66.98±15.15), 63 (6.95%) had carotid IPH. In men and women, carotid IPH was present in 11.43% (48 of 420) and 3.09% (15 of 486), respectively (P<0.0001). Multivariable logistic regression analysis confirmed greater odds of carotid IPH in men for all ages: 45 to 54 (odds ratio=45.45; 95% confidence interval, 3.43-500), 55 to 64 years (odds ratio=21.74; 95% confidence interval, 3.21-142.86), 65 to 74 years (odds ratio=10.42; 95% confidence interval, 2.91-37.04), and ≥75 years (odds ratio=5.00; 95% confidence interval, 2.31-10.75). Male sex modified the effect of age on the presence of carotid IPH (β=0.074; SE=0.036; P=0.0411). CONCLUSIONS: Men have greater age-specific odds of magnetic resonance imaging-depicted carotid IPH compared with women. With increasing age post-menopause, the odds of carotid IPH in women becomes closer to that of men. Delayed onset of carotid IPH in women, an unstable plaque component, may partly explain differential stroke rates between sexes, and further studies are warranted.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE:Stroke rates are higher in men compared with women in the fourth through seventh decades of life, and higher rates may result from differences in carotid intraplaque hemorrhage (IPH), an unstable atherosclerotic plaque component. We report age-specific sex differences in the presence of magnetic resonance imaging-depicted carotid IPH. METHODS:Patients (n=1115) underwent magnetic resonance imaging for carotid IPH between 2005 and 2014. Low-grade carotid stenosispatients (n=906) without prior endarterectomy were eligible for this cross-sectional study. RESULTS: Of the 906 patients included (mean age±SD in years, 66.98±15.15), 63 (6.95%) had carotid IPH. In men and women, carotid IPH was present in 11.43% (48 of 420) and 3.09% (15 of 486), respectively (P<0.0001). Multivariable logistic regression analysis confirmed greater odds of carotid IPH in men for all ages: 45 to 54 (odds ratio=45.45; 95% confidence interval, 3.43-500), 55 to 64 years (odds ratio=21.74; 95% confidence interval, 3.21-142.86), 65 to 74 years (odds ratio=10.42; 95% confidence interval, 2.91-37.04), and ≥75 years (odds ratio=5.00; 95% confidence interval, 2.31-10.75). Male sex modified the effect of age on the presence of carotid IPH (β=0.074; SE=0.036; P=0.0411). CONCLUSIONS:Men have greater age-specific odds of magnetic resonance imaging-depicted carotid IPH compared with women. With increasing age post-menopause, the odds of carotid IPH in women becomes closer to that of men. Delayed onset of carotid IPH in women, an unstable plaque component, may partly explain differential stroke rates between sexes, and further studies are warranted.
Authors: Navneet Singh; Alan R Moody; Geneviéve Rochon-Terry; Alexander Kiss; Anna Zavodni Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2013-04-28 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Willem E Hellings; Gerard Pasterkamp; Bart A N Verhoeven; Dominique P V De Kleijn; Jean-Paul P M De Vries; Kees A Seldenrijk; Theo van den Broek; Frans L Moll Journal: J Vasc Surg Date: 2007-02 Impact factor: 4.268
Authors: Alan R Moody; Rachael E Murphy; Paul S Morgan; Anne L Martel; G S Delay; Steve Allder; Shane T MacSweeney; William G Tennant; John Gladman; John Lowe; Beverley J Hunt Journal: Circulation Date: 2003-06-09 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Leah Hernandez; Agne Laucyte-Cibulskiene; Liam J Ward; Alexandra Kautzky-Willer; Maria-Trinidad Herrero; Colleen M Norris; Valeria Raparelli; Louise Pilote; Peter Stenvinkel; Karolina Kublickiene Journal: Front Cardiovasc Med Date: 2022-08-08
Authors: Carlotta Onnis; Christian Cadeddu Dessalvi; Filippo Cademartiri; Giuseppe Muscogiuri; Simone Angius; Francesca Contini; Jasjit S Suri; Sandro Sironi; Rodrigo Salgado; Antonio Esposito; Luca Saba Journal: Front Cardiovasc Med Date: 2022-09-13