Literature DB >> 21757120

High-intensity signals in carotid plaques on T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging predict coronary events in patients with coronary artery disease.

Teruo Noguchi1, Naoaki Yamada, Masahiro Higashi, Yoichi Goto, Hiroaki Naito.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine whether high-intensity carotid plaques visualized by a noncontrast T1-weighted imaging technique, magnetization-prepared rapid acquisition with gradient echo (MPRAGE), predict future coronary events in patients with clinically stable coronary artery disease (CAD).
BACKGROUND: Coronary plaque vulnerability to rupture can be assessed by examining for the presence of atherosclerosis and measuring intima media thickness (IMT) in surrogate vessels such as the carotid arteries. We previously showed that MPRAGE successfully identifies vulnerable carotid plaques as high-intensity signals. It remains unclear, however, if the presence of carotid high-intensity plaques (HIP) is associated with an increased risk of coronary events.
METHODS: We examined the signal intensity of carotid plaques in 217 patients with clinically stable CAD using MPRAGE with magnetic resonance imaging and measured IMT with ultrasonography. A carotid HIP was defined as a signal >200% that of the adjacent muscle. All patients were divided into 2 groups according to the presence or absence of HIP, namely, the HIP group (n = 116) and the non-HIP group (n = 101), and were followed up for as long as 72 months.
RESULTS: The presence of HIP was significantly associated with cardiac events compared to the non-HIP group (log-rank p < 0.0001). Furthermore, multivariate Cox regression analysis identified the presence of HIP as the strongest independent predictor of cardiac events (hazard ratio: 3.15; 95% confidence interval: 1.93 to 5.58, p < 0.0001) compared with IMT (hazard ratio: 1.62, 95% confidence interval: 0.97 to 2.44, p = 0.055) and other coronary risk factors.
CONCLUSIONS: Characterization of carotid plaques using magnetic resonance imaging with MPRAGE provides more clinically relevant information for the risk assessment of CAD patients than IMT.
Copyright © 2011 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21757120     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.01.056

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  14 in total

Review 1.  Understanding the genetics of coronary artery disease through the lens of noninvasive imaging.

Authors:  Eunice Yang; Jose D Vargas; David A Bluemke
Journal:  Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther       Date:  2012-01

2.  Stress MPI, coronary CTA, and multimodality for subsequent risk analysis.

Authors:  Masanao Naya; Nagara Tamaki
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 5.952

3.  Age-Specific Sex Differences in Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Depicted Carotid Intraplaque Hemorrhage.

Authors:  Navneet Singh; Alan R Moody; Bowen Zhang; Isabella Kaminski; Kush Kapur; Stephanie Chiu; Pascal N Tyrrell
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2017-07-13       Impact factor: 7.914

4.  Carotid Plaque Lipid Content and Fibrous Cap Status Predict Systemic CV Outcomes: The MRI Substudy in AIM-HIGH.

Authors:  Jie Sun; Xue-Qiao Zhao; Niranjan Balu; Moni B Neradilek; Daniel A Isquith; Kiyofumi Yamada; Gádor Cantón; John R Crouse; Todd J Anderson; John Huston; Kevin O'Brien; Daniel S Hippe; Nayak L Polissar; Chun Yuan; Thomas S Hatsukami
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2017-03

5.  Identification of intraplaque haemorrhage in carotid artery by simultaneous non-contrast angiography and intraPlaque haemorrhage (SNAP) imaging: a magnetic resonance vessel wall imaging study.

Authors:  Dongye Li; Huilin Zhao; Xiaoyi Chen; Shuo Chen; Huiyu Qiao; Le He; Rui Li; Jianrong Xu; Chun Yuan; Xihai Zhao
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-11-02       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Identifying a high risk cardiovascular phenotype by carotid MRI-depicted intraplaque hemorrhage.

Authors:  Navneet Singh; Alan R Moody; Geneviéve Rochon-Terry; Alexander Kiss; Anna Zavodni
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2013-04-28       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 7.  Multimodality imaging for the prevention of cardiovascular events: Coronary artery calcium and beyond.

Authors:  Duygu Kocyigit; Alexandra Scanameo; Bo Xu
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2021-06

Review 8.  Susceptibility-weighted imaging: current status and future directions.

Authors:  Saifeng Liu; Sagar Buch; Yongsheng Chen; Hyun-Seok Choi; Yongming Dai; Charbel Habib; Jiani Hu; Joon-Yong Jung; Yu Luo; David Utriainen; Meiyun Wang; Dongmei Wu; Shuang Xia; E Mark Haacke
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 4.044

9.  Blood Pressure Is a Major Modifiable Risk Factor Implicated in Pathogenesis of Intraplaque Hemorrhage: An In Vivo Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study.

Authors:  Jie Sun; Gador Canton; Niranjan Balu; Daniel S Hippe; Dongxiang Xu; Jin Liu; Thomas S Hatsukami; Chun Yuan
Journal:  Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 8.311

10.  Multitarget Vulnerable Plaque Imaging.

Authors:  Marc R Dweck; Zahi A Fayad
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 7.792

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.