Literature DB >> 23850912

Meta-analysis and systematic review of the predictive value of carotid plaque hemorrhage on cerebrovascular events by magnetic resonance imaging.

Tobias Saam1, Holger Hetterich2, Verena Hoffmann3, Chun Yuan4, Martin Dichgans5, Holger Poppert6, Thomas Koeppel7, Ulrich Hoffmann8, Maximilian F Reiser2, Fabian Bamberg2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine precise estimates of the predictive value of carotid intraplaque hemorrhage (IPH) as determined by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for cerebrovascular events.
BACKGROUND: There is emerging evidence that MR-based carotid atherosclerotic plaque assessment identifies high-risk features associated with cerebrovascular events. However, available data are based on smaller samples with heterogeneous source populations despite a promising value for noninvasive risk stratification.
METHODS: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library through September 2012 for studies that followed >35 individuals after baseline MRI. Independent observers abstracted information on populations, MR techniques, outcomes, and study quality. Risk estimates of the presence of IPH for cerebrovascular events were derived in random effects regression analysis, and causes of heterogeneity were determined in meta-regression analysis.
RESULTS: We identified 8 eligible studies including 689 participants who underwent carotid MRI. The prevalence of IPH at baseline was high (49.0%). Over a median follow-up of 19.6 months, a total of 108 cerebrovascular events occurred (15.7% event rate). The presence of IPH was associated with an ∼6-fold higher risk for events (hazard ratio [HR]: 5.69; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.98 to 10.87). The annualized event rate in subjects with detectable IPH was 17.71% compared with 2.43% in patients without IPH. Meta-regression analysis showed symptomatic subjects had higher risks as compared with asymptomatic subjects (HR: 11.71, 95% CI: 5.17 to 26.48 vs. HR: 3.50, 95% CI: 2.59 to 4.73, p = 0.0065), Also, differences were observed for sex and sample size (all p < 0.01), with moderate visual publication bias due to missing smaller sample-size studies (p = 0.18).
CONCLUSIONS: Presence of IPH on MRI strongly predicts cerebrovascular events. Homogenization of future studies is warranted to allow for sufficient assessment of level of evidence for intervention trials.
Copyright © 2013 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CI; HR; IPH; MRI; TIA; confidence interval; hazard ratio; intraplaque hemorrhage; magnetic resonance imaging; meta-analysis; noninvasive imaging; plaque hemorrhage; prognostic value; transient ischemic attack

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23850912     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.06.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  93 in total

1.  Carotid intraplaque hemorrhage on vessel wall MRI does not correlate with TCD emboli monitoring in patients with recently symptomatic carotid atherosclerosis.

Authors:  Adam de Havenon; David Tirschwell; Jennifer J Majersik; Scott McNally; Gregory Stoddard; Anne Moore; Mahmud Mossa-Basha
Journal:  Neuroradiol J       Date:  2017-06-20

2.  Characterization of Carotid Plaque Components by Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping.

Authors:  M Azuma; K Maekawa; A Yamashita; K Yokogami; M Enzaki; Z A Khant; H Takeshima; Y Asada; Y Wang; T Hirai
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2019-12-26       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Reproducibility and differentiation of cervical arteriopathies using in vivo high-resolution black-blood MRI at 3 T.

Authors:  Florian Schwarz; Frederik F Strobl; Clemens C Cyran; Andreas D Helck; Martin Hartmann; Andreas Schindler; Konstantin Nikolaou; Maximilian F Reiser; Tobias Saam
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 2.804

4.  Prediction of Carotid Intraplaque Hemorrhage Using Adventitial Calcification and Plaque Thickness on CTA.

Authors:  L B Eisenmenger; B W Aldred; S-E Kim; G J Stoddard; A de Havenon; G S Treiman; D L Parker; J S McNally
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  Age-Specific Sex Differences in Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Depicted Carotid Intraplaque Hemorrhage.

Authors:  Navneet Singh; Alan R Moody; Bowen Zhang; Isabella Kaminski; Kush Kapur; Stephanie Chiu; Pascal N Tyrrell
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2017-07-13       Impact factor: 7.914

6.  Comparison of 3D magnetic resonance imaging and digital subtraction angiography for intracranial artery stenosis.

Authors:  Ji Eun Park; Seung Chai Jung; Sang Hun Lee; Ji Young Jeon; Ji Ye Lee; Ho Sung Kim; Choong-Gon Choi; Sang Joon Kim; Deok Hee Lee; Seon-Ok Kim; Sun U Kwon; Dong-Wha Kang; Jong S Kim
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Reply.

Authors:  C Zhu; X Tian; A J Degnan; J Lu; Q Liu
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2018-11-15       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 8.  Three-Dimensional Carotid Plaque MR Imaging.

Authors:  Chun Yuan; Dennis L Parker
Journal:  Neuroimaging Clin N Am       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 2.264

9.  Carotid Intraplaque Hemorrhage Imaging with Quantitative Vessel Wall T1 Mapping: Technical Development and Initial Experience.

Authors:  Haikun Qi; Jie Sun; Huiyu Qiao; Shuo Chen; Zechen Zhou; Xinlei Pan; Yishi Wang; Xihai Zhao; Rui Li; Chun Yuan; Huijun Chen
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2017-11-08       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Intraplaque Hemorrhage and the Plaque Surface in Carotid Atherosclerosis: The Plaque At RISK Study (PARISK).

Authors:  A C van Dijk; M T B Truijman; B Hussain; T Zadi; G Saiedie; A A J de Rotte; M I Liem; A F W van der Steen; M J A P Daemen; P J Koudstaal; P J Nederkoorn; J Hendrikse; M E Kooi; A van der Lugt
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 3.825

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.