Literature DB >> 28699132

Effects of Preoperative Malnutrition on Short- and Long-Term Outcomes of Patients with Gastric Cancer: Can We Do Better?

Hua-Long Zheng1,2,3,4, Jun Lu1,2,3,4, Ping Li1,2,3,4, Jian-Wei Xie1,2,3,4, Jia-Bin Wang1,2,3,4, Jian-Xian Lin1,2,3,4, Qi-Yue Chen1,2,3,4, Long-Long Cao1,2,3,4, Mi Lin1,2, Ruhong Tu1,2,3,4, Chang-Ming Huang5,6,7,8, Chao-Hui Zheng9,10,11,12.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The effects of preoperative malnutrition and preoperative correction of hypoalbuminemia (PCH) on the short- and long-term outcomes in patients with gastric cancer are unclear.
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine the effect of preoperative nutritional status on short- and long-term outcomes in patients who underwent radical gastrectomy, and also explored the role of PCH in malnourished patients with gastric cancer.
METHODS: We prospectively reviewed data from patients with gastric cancer who were treated in our department between January 2009 and December 2014. The effect of preoperative nutritional status on short- and long-term outcomes in patients who underwent radical gastrectomy was investigated, and we explored whether PCH could improve the short- and long-term outcomes of these patients.
RESULTS: A total of 1976 patients were analyzed, including 412 patients in the malnourished group and 1564 in the well-nourished group. The overall incidence of complications in the malnourished group was significantly higher than the well-nourished group (21.4 vs. 15.5%, p = 0.005). Except for incision infection (3.2 vs. 1.6%, p = 0.041), there were no significant differences for other complications. In the malnourished group, 98 cases of preoperative hypoproteinemia were corrected (PCH group), whereas 314 cases were not (NPCH group). The incidence of incision infection in the PCH group was significantly lower than in the NPCH group (0 vs. 4.1%, p = 0.041). The median follow-up time was 39 months (1.0-88.0 months), and the 3-year overall survival (OS; 59.1 vs. 75%, p < 0.001) and disease-free survival (DFS; 54.8 vs. 72.5%, p < 0.001) rates were significantly lower in the malnourished group than in the well-nourished group. A multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that malnutrition was an independent prognostic factor for 3-year OS (hazard ratio [HR] 1.211, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-1.452, p = 0.039) and DFS (HR 1.168, 95% CI 1.013-1.398, p = 0.043). For the malnourished group with stage I gastric cancer, the PCH and NPCH groups showed no significant differences in 3-year OS (90.0 vs. 89.0%, p = 0.227) or DFS (90.0 vs. 87.3%, p = 0.363); however, for the malnourished group with stages II-III gastric cancer, the 3-year OS (69.9 vs. 47.6%, p = 0.013) and DFS (55.4 vs. 43.6%, p = 0.046) rates were significantly higher in the PCH group than in the NPCH group.
CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of incision infection was significantly higher in patients with malnutrition than in well-nourished patients. The 3-year OS and DFS rates were significantly lower in malnourished patients than in well-nourished patients. PCH may both reduce the incidence of incisional infection in patients with malnutrition and improve 3-year OS and DFS rates for malnourished patients with stages II-III gastric cancer; however, to confirm our findings, further studies are warranted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28699132     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-017-5998-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  21 in total

1.  Is Sarcopenic Obesity an Indicator of Poor Prognosis in Gastric Cancer Surgery? A Cohort Study in a Western Population.

Authors:  V Rodrigues; F Landi; S Castro; R Mast; N Rodríguez; A Gantxegi; J Pradell; M López-Cano; M Armengol
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2020-07-13       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 2.  State of the art of enhance recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols in esophagogastric cancer surgery: the Western experience.

Authors:  Silvia Salvans; Luis Grande; Mariagiulia Dal Cero; Manuel Pera
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2022-06-21

3.  Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index Predicts Poor Prognosis of Patients After Curative Surgery for Gastric Cancer.

Authors:  Hirotaka Furuke; Daiki Matsubara; Takeshi Kubota; Jun Kiuchi; Hidemasa Kubo; Takuma Ohashi; Hiroki Shimizu; Tomohiro Arita; Yusuke Yamamoto; Hirotaka Konishi; Ryo Morimura; Atsushi Shiozaki; Yoshiaki Kuriu; Hisashi Ikoma; Hitoshi Fujiwara; Kazuma Okamoto; Eigo Otsuji
Journal:  Cancer Diagn Progn       Date:  2021-05-03

4.  Preoperative Nutritional Status and Risk Factors Associated with Delayed Discharge in Geriatric Patients Undergoing Gastrectomy: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Xining Zhao; Jie Liu; Ying Wang; Yuying Yang; Yan Pan; Shengjin Ge
Journal:  Appl Bionics Biomech       Date:  2022-06-03       Impact factor: 1.664

5.  Immunonutrition reduces complications rate and length of stay after laparoscopic total gastrectomy: a single unit retrospective study.

Authors:  Marzia Franceschilli; Leandro Siragusa; Valeria Usai; Sirvjo Dhimolea; Brunella Pirozzi; Simone Sibio; Sara Di Carlo
Journal:  Discov Oncol       Date:  2022-07-11

6.  The Impact of Prognostic Nutritional Index on Coronary Flow Reserve in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

Authors:  Zuhal Caliskan; Mustafa Adem Tatlisu; Resul Kahraman; Savas Gokturk; Suleyman Sayar; Osman Kostek; Seref Kul; Omer Faruk Baycan; Fatma Gül Ozcan; Mustafa Caliskan
Journal:  Medeni Med J       Date:  2019-09-27

Review 7.  Enhanced recovery after surgery for gastric cancer (ERAS-GC): optimizing patient outcome.

Authors:  Jacopo Desiderio; Stefano Trastulli; Vito D'Andrea; Amilcare Parisi
Journal:  Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2020-01-05

8.  Incidence and risk factors of postoperative complications after robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: an analysis of 817 cases based on 10-year experience in a large-scale center.

Authors:  Zheng-Yan Li; Yong-Liang Zhao; Feng Qian; Bo Tang; Jun Chen; Fan Zhang; Ping-Ang Li; Zi-Yan Luo; Yan Shi; Pei-Wu Yu
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2021-01-25       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Patient-reported symptoms in metastatic gastric cancer patients in the last 6 months of life.

Authors:  Lev D Bubis; Victoria Delibasic; Laura E Davis; Yunni Jeong; Kelvin Chan; Ekaterina Kosyachkova; Alyson Mahar; Paul Karanicolas; Natalie G Coburn
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 3.603

10.  Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROM) as A Preoperative Assessment Tool.

Authors:  Sunghye Kim; Pamela W Duncan; Leanne Groban; Hannah Segal; Rica Moonyeen Abbott; Jeff D Williamson
Journal:  J Anesth Perioper Med       Date:  2017-11-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.