Literature DB >> 33492501

Incidence and risk factors of postoperative complications after robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: an analysis of 817 cases based on 10-year experience in a large-scale center.

Zheng-Yan Li1, Yong-Liang Zhao1, Feng Qian1, Bo Tang1, Jun Chen1, Fan Zhang1, Ping-Ang Li1, Zi-Yan Luo1, Yan Shi2, Pei-Wu Yu3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In this study, we investigated the incidence and risk factors for postoperative complications after robotic gastrectomy (RG) in patients with gastric cancer.
METHODS: A total of 817 patients who underwent RG for gastric cancer between March 2010 and August 2019 were analyzed retrospectively. Postoperative complications were categorized according to the Clavien-Dindo classification, and possible risk factors were evaluated.
RESULTS: Among 817 patients who underwent RG, overall, severe, local and systemic complication rates were 13.8, 4.2, 7.0 and 6.9%, respectively. Multivariable analysis revealed that an age of 70 years or older (P < 0.001) and multiorgan resection (P = 0.031) were independent risk factors for the occurrence of overall complications. Multivariable analysis showed that an age of 70 years or older (P = 0.005) and surgeons' experience ≤ 25 cases (P = 0.004) were independent risk factors for severe complications. Regarding local complications, an age of 70 years or older (P < 0.001), multiorgan resection (P = 0.010) and surgeons' experience ≤ 25 cases (P = 0.005) were identified as independent risk factors. An age of 70 years or older (P < 0.001), a BMI of 25 or higher (P = 0.045) and the presence of comorbidity (P = 0.029) were identified as independent risk factors for systemic complications.
CONCLUSIONS: The present study demonstrated that RG is a safe and feasible procedure for the treatment of gastric cancer, and it has an acceptable postoperative morbidity. Elderly patients and insufficient surgeon experience were two major risk factors for the occurrence of complications following RG. We suggest that surgeons choose patients in good condition during their RG learning phase to reduce learning-associated morbidity.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clavien–Dindo classification; Complications; Gastric cancer; Robotic gastrectomy

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33492501     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-020-08218-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  40 in total

Review 1.  Robotic surgery: a current perspective.

Authors:  Anthony R Lanfranco; Andres E Castellanos; Jaydev P Desai; William C Meyers
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Surgical outcomes and learning curve analysis of robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: Multidimensional analysis compared with three‑dimensional high‑definition laparoscopic gastrectomy.

Authors:  Jiyang Li; Hongqing Xi; Xin Guo; Yunhe Gao; Tianyu Xie; Zhi Qiao; Lin Chen
Journal:  Int J Oncol       Date:  2019-07-30       Impact factor: 5.650

3.  Role of robot-assisted distal gastrectomy compared to laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy in suprapancreatic nodal dissection for gastric cancer.

Authors:  Young-Woo Kim; Daniel Reim; Ji Yeon Park; Bang Wool Eom; Myeong-Cherl Kook; Keun Won Ryu; Hong Man Yoon
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Laparoscopy-assisted versus Open D2 Distal Gastrectomy for Advanced Gastric Cancer: Results From a Randomized Phase II Multicenter Clinical Trial (COACT 1001).

Authors:  Young Kyu Park; Hong Man Yoon; Young-Woo Kim; Ji Yeon Park; Keun Won Ryu; Young-Joon Lee; Oh Jeong; Ki Young Yoon; Jun Ho Lee; Sang Eok Lee; Wansik Yu; Sang-Ho Jeong; Taebong Kim; Sohee Kim; Byoung-Ho Nam
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Robotic versus laparoscopic rectal resection surgery: Short-term outcomes and complications: A retrospective comparative study.

Authors:  Tang Bo; Li Chuan; Liu Hongchang; Zhang Chao; Luo Huaxing; Yu Peiwu
Journal:  Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 3.279

6.  Surgical Outcomes After Open, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer.

Authors:  Seung Yoon Yang; Kun Ho Roh; You-Na Kim; Minah Cho; Seung Hyun Lim; Taeil Son; Woo Jin Hyung; Hyoung-Il Kim
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  Robotic mitral valve surgery: a United States multicenter trial.

Authors:  L Wiley Nifong; W R Chitwood; P S Pappas; C R Smith; M Argenziano; V A Starnes; P M Shah
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 5.209

8.  Morbidity and mortality of laparoscopic gastrectomy versus open gastrectomy for gastric cancer: an interim report--a phase III multicenter, prospective, randomized Trial (KLASS Trial).

Authors:  Hyung-Ho Kim; Woo Jin Hyung; Gyu Seok Cho; Min Chan Kim; Sang-Uk Han; Wook Kim; Seung-Wan Ryu; Hyuk-Joon Lee; Kyo Young Song
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Robotic gastrectomy versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of prospective observational studies.

Authors:  Zheng Bobo; Wang Xin; Li Jiang; Wang Quan; Bi Liang; Deng Xiangbing; Wang Ziqiang
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Robotic-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic-assisted total gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy for advanced gastric cancer: short-term outcomes at a mono-institution.

Authors:  Shan-Ping Ye; Jun Shi; Dong-Ning Liu; Qun-Guang Jiang; Xiong Lei; Hua Qiu; Tai-Yuan Li
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2019-07-09       Impact factor: 2.102

View more
  3 in total

1.  Can a single-port robot be safely used for robotic total gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer? First experience using the da Vinci SP platform.

Authors:  Hao Cui; Jian-Xin Cui; Ke-Cheng Zhang; Wen-Quan Liang; Shu-Yan Li; Jun Huang; Lin Chen; Bo Wei
Journal:  Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf)       Date:  2022-06-07

2.  Postoperative complications after robotic resection of colorectal cancer: An analysis based on 5-year experience at a large-scale center.

Authors:  Zhi-Xiang Huang; Zhen Zhou; Hao-Ran Shi; Tai-Yuan Li; Shan-Ping Ye
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2021-12-27

3.  Surgical and oncological outcomes of robotic- versus laparoscopic-assisted distal gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy for advanced gastric cancer: a propensity score‑matched analysis of 1164 patients.

Authors:  Gengmei Gao; Hualin Liao; Qunguang Jiang; Dongning Liu; Taiyuan Li
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-09-28       Impact factor: 3.253

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.