Literature DB >> 28699063

Determination of Collision Cross Sections Using a Fourier Transform Electrostatic Linear Ion Trap Mass Spectrometer.

Eric T Dziekonski1, Joshua T Johnson1, Kenneth W Lee1, Scott A McLuckey2.   

Abstract

Collision cross sections (CCSs) were determined from the frequency-domain linewidths in a Fourier transform electrostatic linear ion trap. With use of an ultrahigh-vacuum precision leak valve and nitrogen gas, transients were recorded as the background pressure in the mass analyzer chamber was varied between 4× 10-8 and 7 × 10-7 Torr. The energetic hard-sphere ion-neutral collision model, described by Xu and coworkers, was used to relate the recorded image charge to the CCS of the molecule. In lieu of our monoisotopically isolating the mass of interest, the known relative isotopic abundances were programmed into the Lorentzian fitting algorithm such that the linewidth was extracted from a sum of Lorentzians. Although this works only if the isotopic distribution is known a priori, it prevents ion loss, preserves the high signal-to-noise ratio, and minimizes the experimental error on our homebuilt instrument. Six tetraalkylammonium cations were used to correlate the CCS measured in the electrostatic linear ion trap with that measured by drift-tube ion mobility spectrometry, for which there was an excellent correlation (R 2 ≈ 0.9999). Although the absolute CCSs derived with our method differ from those reported, the extracted linear correlation can be used to correct the raw CCS. With use of [angiotensin II]2+ and reserpine, the corrected CCSs (334.9 ± 2.1 and 250.1 ± 0.5, respectively) were in good agreement with the reported ion mobility spectrometry CCSs (335 and 254.3, respectively). With sufficient signal-to-noise ratio, the CCSs determined are reproducible to within a fraction of a percent, comparable to the uncertainties reported on dedicated ion mobility instruments. Graphical Abstract ᅟ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Collision cross section; Electrospray ionization; Electrostatic linear ion trap; Fourier transform

Year:  2017        PMID: 28699063     DOI: 10.1007/s13361-017-1720-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom        ISSN: 1044-0305            Impact factor:   3.109


  23 in total

1.  Structural characterization of drug-like compounds by ion mobility mass spectrometry: comparison of theoretical and experimentally derived nitrogen collision cross sections.

Authors:  Iain Campuzano; Matthew F Bush; Carol V Robinson; Claire Beaumont; Keith Richardson; Hyungjun Kim; Hugh I Kim
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2011-12-27       Impact factor: 6.986

2.  Extracting biomolecule collision cross sections from the high-resolution FT-ICR mass spectral linewidths.

Authors:  Ting Jiang; Yu Chen; Lu Mao; Alan G Marshall; Wei Xu
Journal:  Phys Chem Chem Phys       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 3.676

3.  Spontaneous Mass and Charge Losses from Single Multi-Megadalton Ions Studied by Charge Detection Mass Spectrometry.

Authors:  David Z Keifer; Andrew W Alexander; Martin F Jarrold
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 3.109

4.  Protein folding and association: insights from the interfacial and thermodynamic properties of hydrocarbons.

Authors:  A Nicholls; K A Sharp; B Honig
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  1991

Review 5.  Ion mobility-mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Abu B Kanu; Prabha Dwivedi; Maggie Tam; Laura Matz; Herbert H Hill
Journal:  J Mass Spectrom       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 1.982

6.  Collision cross section measurements for biomolecules within a high-resolution Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance cell.

Authors:  Lu Mao; Yu Chen; Yi Xin; Yu Chen; Li Zheng; Nathan K Kaiser; Alan G Marshall; Wei Xu
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 6.986

7.  Collision cross section measurements for biomolecules within a high-resolution FT-ICR cell: theory.

Authors:  Dan Guo; Yi Xin; Dayu Li; Wei Xu
Journal:  Phys Chem Chem Phys       Date:  2015-03-10       Impact factor: 3.676

8.  Utility of Higher Harmonics in Electrospray Ionization Fourier Transform Electrostatic Linear Ion Trap Mass Spectrometry.

Authors:  Eric T Dziekonski; Joshua T Johnson; Scott A McLuckey
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2017-03-30       Impact factor: 6.986

Review 9.  The power of ion mobility-mass spectrometry for structural characterization and the study of conformational dynamics.

Authors:  Francesco Lanucara; Stephen W Holman; Christopher J Gray; Claire E Eyers
Journal:  Nat Chem       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 24.427

10.  Electrochemical processes in a wire-in-a-capillary bulk-loaded, nano-electrospray emitter.

Authors:  G J Van Berkel; K G Asano; P D Schnier
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.262

View more
  2 in total

1.  Optimized Electrostatic Linear Ion Trap for Charge Detection Mass Spectrometry.

Authors:  Joanna A Hogan; Martin F Jarrold
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2018-07-09       Impact factor: 3.109

Review 2.  Recommendations for reporting ion mobility Mass Spectrometry measurements.

Authors:  Valérie Gabelica; Alexandre A Shvartsburg; Carlos Afonso; Perdita Barran; Justin L P Benesch; Christian Bleiholder; Michael T Bowers; Aivett Bilbao; Matthew F Bush; J Larry Campbell; Iain D G Campuzano; Tim Causon; Brian H Clowers; Colin S Creaser; Edwin De Pauw; Johann Far; Francisco Fernandez-Lima; John C Fjeldsted; Kevin Giles; Michael Groessl; Christopher J Hogan; Stephan Hann; Hugh I Kim; Ruwan T Kurulugama; Jody C May; John A McLean; Kevin Pagel; Keith Richardson; Mark E Ridgeway; Frédéric Rosu; Frank Sobott; Konstantinos Thalassinos; Stephen J Valentine; Thomas Wyttenbach
Journal:  Mass Spectrom Rev       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 10.946

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.