Literature DB >> 28698943

Noninvasive electrical conductivity measurement by MRI: a test of its validity and the electrical conductivity characteristics of glioma.

Khin Khin Tha1,2, Ulrich Katscher3, Shigeru Yamaguchi4, Christian Stehning3, Shunsuke Terasaka4, Noriyuki Fujima5, Kohsuke Kudo5,6, Ken Kazumata4, Toru Yamamoto7, Marc Van Cauteren8, Hiroki Shirato6,9.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study noninvasively examined the electrical conductivity (σ) characteristics of diffuse gliomas using MRI and tested its validity.
METHODS: MRI including a 3D steady-state free precession (3D SSFP) sequence was performed on 30 glioma patients. The σ maps were reconstructed from the phase images of the 3D SSFP sequence. The σ histogram metrics were extracted and compared among the contrast-enhanced (CET) and noncontrast-enhanced tumour components (NCET) and normal brain parenchyma (NP). Difference in tumour σ histogram metrics among tumour grades and correlation of σ metrics with tumour grades were tested. Validity of σ measurement using this technique was tested by correlating the mean tumour σ values measured using MRI with those measured ex vivo using a dielectric probe.
RESULTS: Several σ histogram metrics of CET and NCET of diffuse gliomas were significantly higher than NP (Bonferroni-corrected p ≤ .045). The maximum σ of NCET showed a moderate positive correlation with tumour grade (r = .571, Bonferroni-corrected p = .018). The mean tumour σ measured using MRI showed a moderate positive correlation with the σ measured ex vivo (r = .518, p = .040).
CONCLUSIONS: Tissue σ can be evaluated using MRI, incorporation of which may better characterise diffuse gliomas. KEY POINTS: • This study tested the validity of noninvasive electrical conductivity measurements by MRI. • This study also evaluated the electrical conductivity characteristics of diffuse glioma. • Gliomas have higher electrical conductivity values than the normal brain parenchyma. • Noninvasive electrical conductivity measurement can be helpful for better characterisation of glioma.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Electrical conductivity; Glioma; Magnetic resonance imaging; Steady-state free precession; Validity

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28698943     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-017-4942-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  20 in total

1.  Electrical properties tomography in the human brain at 1.5, 3, and 7T: a comparison study.

Authors:  Astrid L H M W van Lier; Alexander Raaijmakers; Tobias Voigt; Jan J W Lagendijk; Peter R Luijten; Ulrich Katscher; Cornelis A T van den Berg
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2013-02-11       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Brain tumor localization using an electrical impedance technique.

Authors:  L Organ; R R Tasker; N F Moody
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1968-01       Impact factor: 5.115

3.  In vivo detection of applied electric currents by magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  M Joy; G Scott; M Henkelman
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1989 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.546

Review 4.  The 2016 World Health Organization Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System: a summary.

Authors:  David N Louis; Arie Perry; Guido Reifenberger; Andreas von Deimling; Dominique Figarella-Branger; Webster K Cavenee; Hiroko Ohgaki; Otmar D Wiestler; Paul Kleihues; David W Ellison
Journal:  Acta Neuropathol       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 17.088

5.  Gliomas: Histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient maps with standard- or high-b-value diffusion-weighted MR imaging--correlation with tumor grade.

Authors:  Yusuhn Kang; Seung Hong Choi; Young-Jae Kim; Kwang Gi Kim; Chul-Ho Sohn; Ji-Hoon Kim; Tae Jin Yun; Kee-Hyun Chang
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-10-03       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Relationships between choline magnetic resonance spectroscopy, apparent diffusion coefficient and quantitative histopathology in human glioma.

Authors:  R K Gupta; T F Cloughesy; U Sinha; J Garakian; J Lazareff; G Rubino; L Rubino; D P Becker; H V Vinters; J R Alger
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.130

7.  Quantitative conductivity and permittivity imaging of the human brain using electric properties tomography.

Authors:  Tobias Voigt; Ulrich Katscher; Olaf Doessel
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2011-02-24       Impact factor: 4.668

8.  Dielectric properties of human glioma and surrounding tissue.

Authors:  Y Lu; B Li; J Xu; J Yu
Journal:  Int J Hyperthermia       Date:  1992 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.914

9.  Comparison of electrical conductivities of various brain phantom gels: Developing a 'Brain Gel Model'

Authors:  Madhuvanthi A Kandadai; Jason L Raymond; George J Shaw
Journal:  Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl       Date:  2012-07-22       Impact factor: 7.328

Review 10.  Recent progress and future challenges in MR electric properties tomography.

Authors:  Ulrich Katscher; Dong-Hyun Kim; Jin Keun Seo
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 2.238

View more
  17 in total

1.  Automated gradient-based electrical properties tomography in the human brain using 7 Tesla MRI.

Authors:  Yicun Wang; Pierre-Francois Van de Moortele; Bin He
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2019-08-16       Impact factor: 2.546

2.  Diagnostic value of electric properties tomography (EPT) for differentiating benign from malignant breast lesions: comparison with standard dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.

Authors:  Naoko Mori; Keiko Tsuchiya; Deepa Sheth; Shunji Mugikura; Kei Takase; Ulrich Katscher; Hiroyuki Abe
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-09-25       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Mapping electrical properties heterogeneity of tumor using boundary informed electrical properties tomography (BIEPT) at 7T.

Authors:  Yicun Wang; Qi Shao; Pierre-Francois Van de Moortele; Emilian Racila; Jiaen Liu; John Bischof; Bin He
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  Brain Tissue Conductivity Measurements with MR-Electrical Properties Tomography: An In Vivo Study.

Authors:  Stefano Mandija; Petar I Petrov; Jord J T Vink; Sebastian F W Neggers; Cornelis A T van den Berg
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2020-12-08       Impact factor: 3.020

5.  [Differences in dielectric properties between mucosal and serosal surface of malignant colorectal tissues, adjacent tissues at 1 cm and 3 cm and normal colorectal tissues].

Authors:  Di-Fu Zhou; Wei-Ke Zhai; Ying Sun; Shuai Han; Lu-Mao Huang; Xue-Gang Xin; Zhou Li; Xue-Fei Yu
Journal:  Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao       Date:  2018-04-20

6.  Magnetic resonance electrical property mapping at 21.1 T: a study of conductivity and permittivity in phantoms, ex vivo tissue and in vivo ischemia.

Authors:  Ghoncheh Amouzandeh; Frederic Mentink-Vigier; Shannon Helsper; F Andrew Bagdasarian; Jens T Rosenberg; Samuel C Grant
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2020-02-28       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  CONtrast Conformed Electrical Properties Tomography (CONCEPT) Based on Multi- Channel Transmission and Alternating Direction Method of Multipliers.

Authors:  Yicun Wang; Pierre-Francois Van De Moortele; Bin He
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2018-08-13       Impact factor: 10.048

8.  Accuracy and precision of electrical permittivity mapping at 3T: the impact of three B 1 + mapping techniques.

Authors:  Soraya Gavazzi; Cornelis A T van den Berg; Alessandro Sbrizzi; H Petra Kok; Lukas J A Stalpers; Jan J W Lagendijk; Hans Crezee; Astrid L H M W van Lier
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2019-02-08       Impact factor: 4.668

9.  Opening a new window on MR-based Electrical Properties Tomography with deep learning.

Authors:  Stefano Mandija; Ettore F Meliadò; Niek R F Huttinga; Peter R Luijten; Cornelis A T van den Berg
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-06-20       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Variation in Reported Human Head Tissue Electrical Conductivity Values.

Authors:  Hannah McCann; Giampaolo Pisano; Leandro Beltrachini
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2019-05-03       Impact factor: 3.020

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.