Literature DB >> 31485151

The Impact of Self-Monitoring Blood Glucose Adherence On Glycemic Goal Attainment in an Indigent Population, With Pharmacy Assistance.

Whitley M Yi, Emily M Van Wieren Jones, B Kyle Hansen, Jay Vora.   

Abstract

Self-monitoring of bood glucose alone is not a good predictor of HbA1c goal attainment. Health plans might benefit from formulary restrictions to provide more cost-effective care, without negatively impacting glycemic control. And by using targeted inteventions, healthcare providers could help maximize SMBG's clinical benefit for patients who receive test strips. Self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) can be an important tool in diabetes treatment, both for patient self-management and for guiding clinicians regarding medication adjustments. Evidence supports the association of SMBG with clinical outcomes in patients with type-1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) although it is mixed for patients with type-2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The cost of SMBG comprises a substantial portion of the total cost for patients with diabetes, and test strips are one of the main expenditures of the University of North Carolina Medical Center Pharmacy Assistance Program (PAP), which provides medication coverage, including test strips, to indigent patients who have no pharmacy insurance. The objective of this study is to evaluate the utility of SMBG based on the impact of test-strip adherence on glycemic goal attainment in an indigent population that is provided with low-copay test strips. This retrospective cohort study included patients with T1DM or T2DM who were enrolled in PAP in 2016 and who received a prescription for test strips during the 90 days prior to hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) measurement. Adherence was defined as the proportion of days covered (PDC) > 0.8. Of the 498 patients encountered, 20% of the adherent group (n = 245) and 25% of the nonadherent group (n = 253) had a goal of HbA1c < 7% (P = 0.24). There were no differences in mean HbA1c between the groups, except in the multiple daily injections (MDI) of the insulin subgroup (8.9% vs. 9.6%, P = 0.009). The adherent group was 80% less likely to have a diabetes-related hospitalization (odds ratio [OR], 0.2; 95% CI, 0.04-0.92). The total test-strip cost to PAP was more than $200,000. In conclusion, in an indigent population, adherence to SMBG does not correlate with glycemic goal attainment and imposes a substantial cost burden on the healthcare system.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG); adherence; cost savings; diabetes mellitus; formulary management; indigent population

Year:  2019        PMID: 31485151      PMCID: PMC6705474     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  P T        ISSN: 1052-1372


  23 in total

1.  Health literacy explains racial disparities in diabetes medication adherence.

Authors:  Chandra Y Osborn; Kerri Cavanaugh; Kenneth A Wallston; Sunil Kripalani; Tom A Elasy; Russell L Rothman; Richard O White
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2011

2.  State Medicaid coverage and access to care for low-income adults.

Authors:  Joel S Weissman; Alan M Zaslavsky; Robert E Wolf; John Z Ayanian
Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved       Date:  2008-02

3.  Blood glucose test strips: options to reduce usage.

Authors:  Tara Gomes; David N Juurlink; Baiju R Shah; J Michael Paterson; Muhammad M Mamdani
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2009-12-21       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Cost of self-monitoring of blood glucose in the United States among patients on an insulin regimen for diabetes.

Authors:  Jason Yeaw; Won Chan Lee; Mark Aagren; Torsten Christensen
Journal:  J Manag Care Pharm       Date:  2012 Jan-Feb

Review 5.  Ethnic differences in mortality, end-stage complications, and quality of care among diabetic patients: a review.

Authors:  Loes C Lanting; Inez M A Joung; Johan P Mackenbach; Steven W J Lamberts; Aart H Bootsma
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 19.112

6.  The impact of blood glucose self-monitoring on metabolic control and quality of life in type 2 diabetic patients: an urgent need for better educational strategies.

Authors:  M Franciosi; F Pellegrini; G De Berardis; M Belfiglio; D Cavaliere; B Di Nardo; S Greenfield; S H Kaplan; M Sacco; G Tognoni; M Valentini; A Nicolucci
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 19.112

7.  Cost effectiveness of self monitoring of blood glucose in patients with non-insulin treated type 2 diabetes: economic evaluation of data from the DiGEM trial.

Authors:  Judit Simon; Alastair Gray; Philip Clarke; Alisha Wade; Andrew Neil; Andrew Farmer
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2008-04-17

8.  Efficacy of self monitoring of blood glucose in patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes (ESMON study): randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Maurice J O'Kane; Brendan Bunting; Margaret Copeland; Vivien E Coates
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2008-04-17

9.  Reduction in self-monitoring of blood glucose in persons with type 2 diabetes results in cost savings and no change in glycemic control.

Authors:  Joy L Meier; Arthur L M Swislocki; Julio R Lopez; Robert H Noth; Patricia Bartlebaugh; David Siegel
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.229

10.  Structured self-monitoring of blood glucose significantly reduces A1C levels in poorly controlled, noninsulin-treated type 2 diabetes: results from the Structured Testing Program study.

Authors:  William H Polonsky; Lawrence Fisher; Charles H Schikman; Deborah A Hinnen; Christopher G Parkin; Zhihong Jelsovsky; Bettina Petersen; Matthias Schweitzer; Robin S Wagner
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 19.112

View more
  1 in total

1.  The Importance of Patient and Family Engagement, the Needs for Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose (SMBG) - Our Perspectives Learned Through a Story of SMBG Assistive Devices Made by a Husband of the Patient with Diabetes.

Authors:  Moritsugu Kimura; Masao Toyoda; Nobumichi Saito; Makiko Takahashi; Konomi Isozumi; Eri Kato; Daiji Kawanami; Masafumi Fukagawa
Journal:  Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes       Date:  2022-05-25       Impact factor: 3.249

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.