Literature DB >> 28694917

Complete genome sequence of Microbulbifer sp. CCB-MM1, a halophile isolated from Matang Mangrove Forest, Malaysia.

Tsu Horng Moh1, Nyok-Sean Lau1, Go Furusawa1, Al-Ashraf Abdullah Amirul1,2.   

Abstract

Microbulbifer sp. CCB-MM1 is a halophile isolated from estuarine sediment of Matang Mangrove Forest, Malaysia. Based on 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis, strain CCB-MM1 is a potentially new species of genus Microbulbifer. Here we describe its features and present its complete genome sequence with annotation. The genome sequence is 3.86 Mb in size with GC content of 58.85%, harbouring 3313 protein coding genes and 92 RNA genes. A total of 71 genes associated with carbohydrate active enzymes were found using dbCAN. Ectoine biosynthetic genes, ectABC operon and ask_ect were detected using antiSMASH 3.0. Cell shape determination genes, mreBCD operon, rodA and rodZ were annotated, congruent with the rod-coccus cell cycle of the strain CCB-MM1. In addition, putative mreBCD operon regulatory gene, bolA was detected, which might be associated with the regulation of rod-coccus cell cycle observed from the strain.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Complete genome sequence; Estuarine sediment; Halophile; Mangrove; Microbulbifer

Year:  2017        PMID: 28694917      PMCID: PMC5501506          DOI: 10.1186/s40793-017-0248-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci        ISSN: 1944-3277


Introduction

sp. CCB-MM1 is a halophile isolated from an estuarine sediment sample taken from Matang Mangrove Forest, Malaysia. The genus was proposed by González [1] with the description of which was isolated from marine pulp mill effluent. are typically found in high-salinity environments including marine sediment [2], salt marsh [3], costal soil [4] as well as mangrove soil [5]. They were known for their capability to degrade a great variety of polysaccharides including cellulose [1, 5], xylan [1, 5, 6], chitin [1, 5, 6], agar [3, 6] and alginate [7]. strains are potential sources of carbohydrate active enzymes with biotechnological interest. One of the species, had been reported with the ability to degrade more than 10 different polysaccharides [7]. Polysaccharides have a broad range of industrial applications. The most common storage polysaccharide, starch, can be used as food additives [8], excipients [9] and substrates in fermentation process to produce bioethanol [10]. Structural polysaccharides such as cellulose, chitosan and chitin, on the other hand, can be used to develop high-performance materials due to their renewability, biodegradability, biological inertness and low cost [11-13]. However, polysaccharides from natural sources are often not suitable for direct application. Chemical modifications involving the reactive groups (carboxyl, hydroxyl, amido, and acetamido groups) on the backbone of polysaccharide are required to alter their chemical and physical properties to suit the application purposes [14]. In the past years, explorations and researches are in favor of enzymatic method using carbohydrate active enzymes [15]. This alternative method offers the advantages of substrate specificity, stereospecificity, and environment friendly [16]. Hence, the discovery of novel carbohydrate active enzymes has great biotechnological interest and strains are potential sources of these enzymes. Therefore, we sequenced the genome of sp. CCB-MM1 with primary objective to identify potential carbohydrate active enzyme coding genes. The genome insights will serve as baseline for downstream analyses including enzyme activity assays and functional elucidation of these genes. To date, there are seven genomes of publicly available from GenBank, namely S89 (NZ_AFPJ00000000.1) [17], ATCC 700307T (NZ_AQYJ00000000.1), HZ11 (NZ_JELR00000000.1) [18], sp. ZGT114 (LQBR00000000.1), DAU221 (CP014864.1) [19], sp. Q7 (LROY00000000.1) and sp. WRN-8 (LRFG00000000.1). All of the genomes are assembled to draft assembly only except the DAU221 genome. Here we present the complete genome of sp. CCB-MM1 and some insights from comparative analysis with seven other genomes.

Organism information

Classification and features

sp. strain CCB-MM1 was isolated from mangrove sediment obtained from Matang Mangrove Forest. The isolation was done using the method previously described [20] with the use of H-ASWM (2.4% artificial sea water, 0.5% tryptone, 10 mM HEPES, pH 7.6) [21]. CCB-MM1 is a Gram-negative, aerobic, non-spore-forming and halophilic bacterium (Table 1). Its shape appears to be associated with its growth phases where it is rod-shaped at exponential phase (Fig. 1a) and cocci-shaped at stationary phase (Fig. 1b). The rod-shaped cell size ranges from approximately 1.3 to 2.5 μm in length and 0.3 μm in width while the diameter of coccus cells is approximately 0.6 μm. The colonies observed on agar plate are white in colour, circular, and raised with entire edge.
Table 1

Classification and general features of Microbulbifer sp. CCB-MM1 [69]

MIGS IDPropertyTermEvidence codea
ClassificationDomain Bacteria TAS [70]
Phylum Proteobacteria TAS [71]
Class Gammaproteobacteria TAS [72]
Order Cellvibrionales TAS [73, 74]
Family Microbulbiferaceae TAS [73, 74]
Genus Microbulbifer TAS [1]
Species UnknownIDA
Strain CCB-MM1IDA
Gram stainNegativeIDA
Cell shapeRod-coccusIDA
MotilityNon-motileIDA
SporulationNon-sporulatingNAS
Temperature rangeMesophileNAS
Optimum temperature30 °CNAS
pH range; Optimum6.0–9.0; 7.0IDA
Carbon sourceNot reported
MIGS-6HabitatEstuarine sedimentIDA
MIGS-6.3SalinityHalophileNAS
MIGS-22OxygenAerobicIDA
MIGS-15Biotic relationshipFree-livingNAS
MIGS-14PathogenicityNon-pathogenicNAS
MIGS-4Geographic locationMalaysia: Matang Mangrove ForestIDA
MIGS-5Sample collection timeOctober 1, 2014IDA
MIGS-4.1Latitude4.85228 NIDA
MIGS-4.2Longitude100.55777 EIDA
MIGS-4.3Depth10 cmIDA
MIGS-4.4AltitudeNot reported

aEvidence codes - IDA inferred from direct assay, TAS traceable author statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature), NAS non-traceable author statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are from http://www.geneontology.org/GO.evidence.shtml of the Gene Ontology project [75]

Fig. 1

Scanning electron micrograph of Microbulbifer sp. CCB-MM1 at (a) exponential and (b) stationary phase

Classification and general features of Microbulbifer sp. CCB-MM1 [69] aEvidence codes - IDA inferred from direct assay, TAS traceable author statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature), NAS non-traceable author statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are from http://www.geneontology.org/GO.evidence.shtml of the Gene Ontology project [75] Scanning electron micrograph of Microbulbifer sp. CCB-MM1 at (a) exponential and (b) stationary phase The 16S rRNA gene sequence of CCB-MM1 was amplified and sequenced using the universal primer pair 27F and 1492R [22]. The 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis was performed by using BLASTN [23] against NCBI 16S ribosomal RNA (Bacteria and Archaea) database. BLAST report revealed that the closely related strains include Cs16bT (98.1%), CC-LN1-12T (97.3%), TF-17T (97.4%), SPO729T (97.3%), and GY2T (97.3%). Based on the threshold of -specific 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity at 98.7% [24], the analysis suggests that CCB-MM1 is a new species belonging to the genus . To reconstruct a phylogenetic tree of , the 16S rRNA sequences of other Microbubifer type strains were downloaded from GenBank. Then, these sequences were aligned using MUSCLE [25, 26] and MEGA6 [27] was used to reconstruct a neighbour-joining tree [28] with 1000 replications of bootstrap method test [29]. As shown in Fig. 2, CCB-MM1 formed a cluster with Cs16bT in the phylogenetic tree.
Fig. 2

Neighbor-joining phylogenetic tree highlighting the position of Microbulbifer sp. CCB-MM1 relative to other type strains within the genus Microbulbifer, built using MEGA6 based on 16S rRNA sequences with their GenBank accession numbers indicated in parentheses

Neighbor-joining phylogenetic tree highlighting the position of Microbulbifer sp. CCB-MM1 relative to other type strains within the genus Microbulbifer, built using MEGA6 based on 16S rRNA sequences with their GenBank accession numbers indicated in parentheses

Genome sequencing information

Genome project history

Genome of CCB-MM1 was sequenced in October 2015. The whole genome sequencing and annotation were done by Centre for Chemical Biology (Universiti Sains Malaysia). The complete genome sequence is available in GenBank under the accession number CP014143. The project information is summarized in Table 2.
Table 2

Project information

MIGS IDPropertyTerm
MIGS-31Finishing qualityComplete
MIGS-28Libraries usedPacBio P6-C4 chemistry, size selected 10 kb library, two SMRT Cells
MIGS-29Sequencing platformPacBio RS II
MIGS-31.2Fold coverage431×
MIGS-30AssemblersHGAP 3, PacBio SMRT Analysis v2.3
MIGS-32Gene calling methodProdigal
Locus tagAUP74
Genbank IDCP014143
GenBank date of releaseSeptember 30, 2016
GOLD IDGp0156207
BIOPROJECTPRJNA305828
MIGS-13Source material identifierSAMN04334609
Project relevanceEnvironmental
Project information

Growth conditions and genomic DNA preparation

CCB-MM1 was cultured aerobically in 100 mL of H-ASWM for overnight (16 h) at 30 °C with shaking. The genomic DNA was extracted using modified phenol-chloroform method [30]. The integrity of extracted genomic DNA was assessed by gel electrophoresis using 0.7% agarose gel and the quantification was done using NanoDrop 2000 Spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, USA).

Genome sequencing and assembly

The whole genome of CCB-MM1 was sequenced using PacBio RS II platform with P6-C4 chemistry (Pacific Biosciences, USA). Two SMRT Cells were used and 2,674,097,380 pre-filter polymerase read bases were obtained, which was approximately 692X coverage of the genome. The reads were assembled using HGAP3 protocol [31] on SMRT Portal v2.3.0 with reads more than 25,000 bp in length being used as seed bases. The assembly result was a circular chromosome with the size of 3,864,326 bp, average base coverage of 431X and 100% base calling. The assembled sequence was polished twice using the resequencing protocol until the consensus concordance reached 100%.

Genome annotation

The genome was annotated using Prokka 1.11 pipeline [32]. The pipeline uses Prodigal [33], RNAmmer [34], Aragorn [35], SignalP [36] and Infernal [37] to predict the coding sequences (CDS), ribosomal RNA genes, transfer RNA genes, signal leader peptides and non-coding RNAs, respectively. In addition, the translated CDS output by Prokka were used to BLAST against protein databases including non-redundant protein database (nr) from GenBank, Swiss-Prot and TrEMBL from UniProt [38], and KEGG database [39]. COG functional categories assignment was done using RPS-BLAST [40] search against the COG database [41]. In addition, antiSMASH 3.0 [42] was used to identify biosynthetic gene clusters and dbCAN [43] was used to identify carbohydrate active enzymes.

Genome properties

CCB-MM1 only contains one circular chromosome and no plasmid. The size of the chromosome is 3,864,326 bp with an overall of 58.85% G + C content (Table 3). The complete genome consists of 3313 ORFs, 79 tRNA, 12 rRNA and 1 tmRNA genes. Of all the 3313 predicted ORFs, 2030 of them can be assigned with functional prediction and 2563 of them can be assigned to COG functional categories (Table 4). The circular map of the genome generated using CGView Comparison Tool [44] is depicted in Fig. 3.
Table 3

Genome statistics

AttributeValue% of Totala
Genome size3,864,326100.00
DNA coding (bp)3,487,72790.25
DNA G + C (bp)2,274,19858.85
DNA scaffolds1-
Total genes3406100.00
Protein coding genes331397.27
RNA genes922.70
Pseudo genes10.03
Genes in internal clusters--
Genes with function prediction203059.62
Genes assigned to COGs256375.27
Genes with Pfam domains285683.88
Genes with signal peptides40311.84
Genes with transmembrane helices85124.99
CRISPR repeats00

aThe total is based on either the size of the genome in base pairs or the total number of protein coding genes in the annotated genome

Table 4

Number of genes associated with general COG functional categories

CodeValue% agea Description
J2296.9Translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis
A20.1RNA processing and modification
K1273.8Transcription
L1113.3Replication, recombination and repair
B00.0Chromatin structure and dynamics
D411.2Cell cycle control, cell division, chromosome partitioning
Y00.0Nuclear structure
V641.9Defense mechanisms
T1093.3Signal transduction mechanisms
M2186.6Cell wall/membrane/envelope biogenesis
N80.2Cell motility
Z20.1Cytoskeleton
W30.1Extracellular structures
U481.4Intracellular trafficking, secretion, and vesicular transport
O1735.2Posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones
X30.1Mobilome: prophages, transposons
C1805.4Energy production and conversion
G1314.0Carbohydrate transport and metabolism
E2126.4Amino acid transport and metabolism
F531.6Nucleotide transport and metabolism
H1133.4Coenzyme transport and metabolism
I1334.0Lipid transport and metabolism
P1675.0Inorganic ion transport and metabolism
Q551.7Secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism
R2266.8General function prediction only
S2246.8Function unknown
-75122.7Not in COGs

aThe total is based on the total number of protein coding genes in the annotated genome

Fig. 3

Circular map of the genome of Microbulbifer sp. CCB-MM1 generated using CGView Comparison Tool [44]. Circles (from outside) representing the following: 1. COG functional categories for forward coding sequence; 2. Forward sequence features; 3. Reverse sequence features; 4. COG functional categories for reverse coding sequence; 5. GC content; 6. GC skew

Genome statistics aThe total is based on either the size of the genome in base pairs or the total number of protein coding genes in the annotated genome Number of genes associated with general COG functional categories aThe total is based on the total number of protein coding genes in the annotated genome Circular map of the genome of Microbulbifer sp. CCB-MM1 generated using CGView Comparison Tool [44]. Circles (from outside) representing the following: 1. COG functional categories for forward coding sequence; 2. Forward sequence features; 3. Reverse sequence features; 4. COG functional categories for reverse coding sequence; 5. GC content; 6. GC skew

Insights from the genome sequence

Comparative genomics

There are seven genomes of strains publicly available in GenBank to date. To assess the relatedness between CCB-MM1 and publicly available genomes, ANI values between the genomes were calculated using method based on MUMmer alignment [45]. Based on the results (Table 5), the ANI values ranged from 85.58% ( sp. ZGT114 and sp. WRN-8) to 83.45% (Microbublfer thermotolerans DAU221). These ANI values fall below 95% [46], suggesting that CCB-MM1 represents a different species from the other seven sequenced species. Interestingly, the ANI value between genomes of sp. ZGT114 and sp. WRN-8 is 99.99%, which suggests that these two strains belong to the same species. The circular map comparing CCB-MM1 genome and seven other genomes is shown in Fig. 4.
Table 5

ANI value(%) between Microbulbifer sp. CCB-MM1 genome and seven other Microbulbifer genomes calculated using ANIm [45]

CCB-MM1ZGT114WRN-8HZ11S89Q7ATCC 700307T DAU221
CCB-MM1100.0085.5885.5884.7584.6584.6184.3783.45
ZGT11485.58100.0099.9984.6584.6484.7084.2983.85
WRN-885.5899.99100.0084.6584.7084.6784.2983.87
HZ1184.7584.6584.65100.0085.2385.5884.6883.71
S8984.6584.6484.7085.23100.0085.0384.7783.66
Q784.6184.7084.6785.5885.03100.0084.7583.77
ATCC 70030784.3784.2984.2984.6884.7784.75100.0083.59
DAU22183.4583.8583.8783.7183.6683.7783.59100.00

CCB-MM1 = Microbulbifer sp. CCB-MM1; ZGT114 = Microbulbifer sp. ZGT114; WRN-8 = Microbulbifer sp. WRN-8; HZ11 = Microbulbifer elongatus HZ11; S89 = Microbulbifer agarilyticus S89; Q7 = Microbulbifer sp. Q7; ATCC 700307T = Microbulbifer variabilis ATCC 700307T; DAU221 = Microbulbifer thermotolerans DAU221

Fig. 4

Circular map comparing strain CCB-MM1 genome and seven other Microbulbifer genomes generated using CGView Comparison Tool [44]. The two outermost rings represent forward and reverse sequence features respectively. The remaining seven rings show the regions of sequence similarity detected by BLAST comparisons conducted between nucleotide sequences from the CCB-MM1 genome and seven other Microbulbifer genomes with the order (from outside) as follow: Microbulbifer elongatus HZ11, Microbulbifer sp. Q7, Microbulbifer sp. WRN-8, Microbulbifer sp. ZGT114, Microbulbifer agarilyticus S89, Microbulbifer thermotolerans DAU221 and Microbulbifer variabilis ATCC 700307T

ANI value(%) between Microbulbifer sp. CCB-MM1 genome and seven other Microbulbifer genomes calculated using ANIm [45] CCB-MM1 = Microbulbifer sp. CCB-MM1; ZGT114 = Microbulbifer sp. ZGT114; WRN-8 = Microbulbifer sp. WRN-8; HZ11 = Microbulbifer elongatus HZ11; S89 = Microbulbifer agarilyticus S89; Q7 = Microbulbifer sp. Q7; ATCC 700307T = Microbulbifer variabilis ATCC 700307T; DAU221 = Microbulbifer thermotolerans DAU221 Circular map comparing strain CCB-MM1 genome and seven other Microbulbifer genomes generated using CGView Comparison Tool [44]. The two outermost rings represent forward and reverse sequence features respectively. The remaining seven rings show the regions of sequence similarity detected by BLAST comparisons conducted between nucleotide sequences from the CCB-MM1 genome and seven other Microbulbifer genomes with the order (from outside) as follow: Microbulbifer elongatus HZ11, Microbulbifer sp. Q7, Microbulbifer sp. WRN-8, Microbulbifer sp. ZGT114, Microbulbifer agarilyticus S89, Microbulbifer thermotolerans DAU221 and Microbulbifer variabilis ATCC 700307T

Carbohydrate active enzymes

dbCAN [43] was used to predict carbohydrate-active enzyme coding genes present in CCB-MM1 genome, particularly genes belonging to glycoside hydrolase and polysaccharide lyase families that could provide us the insights on carbohydrate degrading capability of CCB-MM1. The analysis was done by running HMMER3 [47] scan using HMMs profile downloaded from dbCAN (version: dbCAN-fam-HMMs.txt.v4) with an e-value cut off of 1e-18 and coverage cut off of 0.35. A total of 71 carbohydrate-active genes were detected and further analysis of these genes using SignalP predicted that 25 of them contain signal peptides. As shown in Table 6, we had found 29 genes associated with GH families including GH3, GH5, GH13, GH16, GH20, GH23, GH31, GH38, GH103 and GH130, however, we found no genes associated with PL families in the genome. Annotation of the GH genes revealed that CCB-MM1 genome possesses genes encoding cellulase (GH5), alpha-amylase, pullulanase (GH13) and beta-glucanase (GH16) with potential interest for biotechnological applications. While gene coding for beta-hexosaminidase, one of the chitinolytic enzymes [48], is present in the genome of CCB-MM1, gene that codes for chitinase was not detected. This suggests that CCB-MM1 lacks the ability to degrade chitin, although further assays are required to confirm the phenotype.
Table 6

GH enzyme coding genes found in CCB-MM1 genome

GH FamilyAnnotationSignal peptideLocus tag
3Periplasmic beta-glucosidase precursorYesAUP74_01723
Periplasmic beta-glucosidase precursorNoAUP74_01724
Beta-hexosaminidaseNoAUP74_02396
Beta-hexosaminidase A precursorYesAUP74_02833
5Cellulase (glycosyl hydrolase family 5)NoAUP74_03275
hypothetical proteinNoAUP74_03276
13Pullulanase precursorYesAUP74_00304
Oligo-1,6-glucosidaseNoAUP74_00394
CyclomaltodextrinaseYesAUP74_00399
4-alpha-glucanotransferaseNoAUP74_00401
Alpha-amylase precursorYesAUP74_00413
Sucrose phosphorylaseNoAUP74_03226
16Glucan endo-1,3-beta-glucosidase A1 precursorNoAUP74_01725
Beta-glucanase precursorYesAUP74_01727
20N,N′-diacetylchitobiase precursorNoAUP74_01890
23Membrane-bound lytic murein transglycosylase F precursorYesAUP74_00546
Membrane-bound lytic murein transglycosylase F precursorNoAUP74_01553
Membrane-bound lytic murein transglycosylase F precursorYesAUP74_01554
murein transglycosylase CYesAUP74_01596
Membrane-bound lytic murein transglycosylase D precursorYesAUP74_02266
Soluble lytic murein transglycosylase precursorYesAUP74_02385
Membrane-bound lytic murein transglycosylase F precursorNoAUP74_03185
Membrane-bound lytic murein transglycosylase F precursorNoAUP74_03186
Membrane-bound lytic murein transglycosylase F precursorYesAUP74_03326
31Alpha-xylosidaseYesAUP74_00400
38Mannosylglycerate hydrolaseNoAUP74_01043
103Membrane-bound lytic murein transglycosylase B precursorYesAUP74_01186
Membrane-bound lytic murein transglycosylase B precursorYesAUP74_01707
1304-O-beta-D-mannosyl-D-glucose phosphorylaseNoAUP74_03278
GH enzyme coding genes found in CCB-MM1 genome

Rod-coccus cell cycle

were found to demonstrate rod-coccus cell cycle, in association with different growth phases [49]. This cell cycle was also observed in CCB-MM1. In CCB-MM1 genome, we found genes which are known to be involved in determining and maintaining the rod shape of bacteria, including mreBCD [50] (AUP74_00016, AUP74_00017 and AUP74_00018), rodA [51] (AUP74_01706) and rodZ [52] (AUP74_01850). BLAST analysis showed that these genes are present in all other genomes. In addition, we detected the presence of general stress response gene, bolA, in all genomes. It has been demonstrated that the overexpression of bolA in E.coli inhibited cell elongation and reduced the transcription of mreBCD operon [53]. The gene, mreB, and its product, actin homolog have been studied for their functions in several species of bacteria. This protein lies beneath the cell surface, forming actin-like cables which function as guidance for the synthesis of longitudinal cell wall [54]. While MreB is not essential in E. coli [55], it is found to be essential for [56], [57] and [58]. In E. coli, depletion of MreB caused cells to change from rod-like to spherical shape but these cells were able to survive [59]. In contrast, the spherical-shaped cells eventually lyse. For CCB-MM1, the spherical-shaped cells do not lyse but grow into rod-shaped again after being transferred into fresh medium. We infer that mreB gene may have important functions in determining cell shape and the rod-coccus cycle of is likely regulated by BolA through inhibition of mreB transcription when triggered by stress.

Secondary metabolites, ectoine

Ectoine and hydroxyectoine are compatible solutes found primarily in halophilic bacteria. When triggered by osmotic stress, bacteria produce and accumulate them intracellularly to balance the osmotic pressure [60]. Apart from osmotic stress, they were also protectants against temperature stress [61]. A cluster of genes responsible for the biosynthesis of ectoine [62] has been identified in CCB-MM1 genome using antiSMASH 3.0 [42]. These genes encode for aspartate kinase (Ask_Ect) (AUP74_00280), L-ectoine synthase (EctC) (AUP74_00281), diaminobutyrate-2-oxoglutarate transaminase (EctB) (AUP74_00282), L-2,4-diaminobutyric acid acetyltransferase (EctA) (AUP74_00283) and HTH transcriptional regulator (AUP74_00284). The lack of the gene ectD, ectoine hydroxylase, in CCB-MM1 genome suggests that it only has the ability to synthesize ectoine but not hydroxyectoine. By using BLASTP, we searched and found similar gene cluster in other genomes except ATCC 700307 T. While the reason for the absence of these genes in ATCC 700307 T is unknown, our findings suggest that utilized only ectoine instead of ectoine/hydroxyectoine mixture. The transcriptional regulator of ectoine operon, EctR, found in belongs to MarR family [63]. HTH transcriptional regulator (AUP74_00284) in CCB-MM1 also contains the conserved domain of MarR family. This implies that the HTH transcriptional regulator is likely the putative transcriptional regulator of ectoine operon in . Ectoine has attracted considerable biotechnological interest due to its stabilizing effects that extend from proteins [64], nucleic acids [65] to whole cells [66]. Such properties allow it to be used in skin care product as cell protectants [66], protein stabilizers [67] and medical application as cryoprotectants in cryopreservation of human cells [68].

Conclusion

In this study we presented the complete genome sequence of sp. CCB-MM1 with genome size of 3.86 Mb and G + C content of 58.85%. We discussed some insights on its phenotypic characteristics from the genomic perspective, covering carbohydrate active enzymes, rod-coccus cell cycle and secondary metabolite, ectoine. The genome sequence provides valuable information for functional elucidations of novel enzymes for both biotechnological application and fundamental research purposes.
  68 in total

1.  KEGG: kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes.

Authors:  M Kanehisa; S Goto
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  RodZ, a component of the bacterial core morphogenic apparatus.

Authors:  S Anisah Alyahya; Roger Alexander; Teresa Costa; Adriano O Henriques; Thierry Emonet; Christine Jacobs-Wagner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-01-21       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees.

Authors:  N Saitou; M Nei
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 16.240

4.  Draft genome sequence of Microbulbifer elongatus strain HZ11, a brown seaweed-degrading bacterium with potential ability to produce bioethanol from alginate.

Authors:  Cong Sun; Yu-Jie Chen; Xin-Qi Zhang; Jie Pan; Hong Cheng; Min Wu
Journal:  Mar Genomics       Date:  2014-06-04       Impact factor: 1.710

5.  Control of cell shape and elongation by the rodA gene in Bacillus subtilis.

Authors:  A O Henriques; P Glaser; P J Piggot; C P Moran
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 3.501

6.  Microbulbifer variabilis sp. nov. and Microbulbifer epialgicus sp. nov., isolated from Pacific marine algae, possess a rod-coccus cell cycle in association with the growth phase.

Authors:  Miyuki Nishijima; Takahide Takadera; Nobutaka Imamura; Hiroaki Kasai; Kwang-Deuk An; Kyoko Adachi; Tomokazu Nagao; Hiroshi Sano; Kazuhide Yamasato
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2009-06-19       Impact factor: 2.747

7.  Microbulbifer salipaludis sp. nov., a moderate halophile isolated from a Korean salt marsh.

Authors:  Jung-Hoon Yoon; In-Gi Kim; Dong-Yeon Shin; Kook Hee Kang; Yong-Ha Park
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.747

8.  Comparing thousands of circular genomes using the CGView Comparison Tool.

Authors:  Jason R Grant; Adriano S Arantes; Paul Stothard
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 3.969

9.  dbCAN: a web resource for automated carbohydrate-active enzyme annotation.

Authors:  Yanbin Yin; Xizeng Mao; Jincai Yang; Xin Chen; Fenglou Mao; Ying Xu
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  A taxonomic framework for emerging groups of ecologically important marine gammaproteobacteria based on the reconstruction of evolutionary relationships using genome-scale data.

Authors:  Stefan Spring; Carmen Scheuner; Markus Göker; Hans-Peter Klenk
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2015-04-09       Impact factor: 5.640

View more
  3 in total

1.  Liquid Organic Fertilizer Amendment Alters Rhizosphere Microbial Community Structure and Co-occurrence Patterns and Improves Sunflower Yield Under Salinity-Alkalinity Stress.

Authors:  Haiyang Li; Nanyan Luo; Chenglong Ji; Jin Li; Lan Zhang; Li Xiao; Xiaolin She; Zhe Liu; Yulong Li; Cunshou Liu; Qiao Guo; Hangxian Lai
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2021-09-18       Impact factor: 4.192

2.  Extracellular expression of a novel β-agarase from Microbulbifer sp. Q7, isolated from the gut of sea cucumber.

Authors:  Qian Su; Tianyi Jin; Yuan Yu; Min Yang; Haijin Mou; Li Li
Journal:  AMB Express       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 3.298

Review 3.  The Methods of Digging for "Gold" within the Salt: Characterization of Halophilic Prokaryotes and Identification of Their Valuable Biological Products Using Sequencing and Genome Mining Tools.

Authors:  Jakub Lach; Paulina Jęcz; Dominik Strapagiel; Agnieszka Matera-Witkiewicz; Paweł Stączek
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 4.096

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.