| Literature DB >> 28694839 |
Juan Antonio Martos-Sitcha1, Azucena Bermejo-Nogales1,2, Josep Alvar Calduch-Giner1, Jaume Pérez-Sánchez1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Acclimation to abiotic challenges, including decreases in O2 availability, requires physiological and anatomical phenotyping to accommodate the organism to the environmental conditions. The retention of a nucleus and functional mitochondria in mature fish red blood cells makes blood a promising tissue to analyse the transcriptome and metabolic responses of hypoxia-challenged fish in an integrative and non-invasive manner.Entities:
Keywords: Blood transcriptomics; Hypoxia; Limiting oxygen saturation; Mitochondrial activity; Oxphos; Sparus aurata
Year: 2017 PMID: 28694839 PMCID: PMC5501551 DOI: 10.1186/s12983-017-0220-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Zool ISSN: 1742-9994 Impact factor: 3.172
Fig. 1Water O2 kinetics in fish exposed to hypoxic conditions. The steady-state was set at (a) 41–42% O2 saturation (3 ppm) or (b) 18–19% O2 saturation (1.3 ppm). Sampling points (T0, T1 and T2) are indicated with arrowheads. LOS was calculated according to Remen et al. [5]
Relative gene expression of mitochondrial-related genes in total blood cells
Gilthead sea breams were exposed to normoxic (oxygen saturation > 85%) and hypoxic (1.3 ppm, oxygen saturation = 18–19%) conditions. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM (n = 7–8). Statistically significant differences between normoxic and hypoxic fish are indicated (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01; Student’s t test). nd: non-detected. Gene names of mitochondrial-encoded catalytic subunits of the OXPHOS pathway are highlighted in bold and italicised. Gene names of nuclear-encoded catalytic subunits of the OXPHOS pathway are highlighted in bold. Gene names of nuclear-encoded regulatory subunits are presented in normal font. Gene names of nuclear-encoded assembly factors are italicised. Square symbols are used for up- (red) and down-regulated genes (green)
Fig. 2Effects of normoxia (white bars) and hypoxia (black bars) on blood haematology and biochemistry. Hypoxia levels were set above (a, c, e, g) or below (b, d, f, h) the LOS. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM (n = 7–8). Statistically significant differences between normoxic and hypoxic fish are indicated (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01; two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by the Holm-Sidak test)
Fig. 3Effects of normoxia (white bars) and hypoxia (black bars) below the LOS on plasma parameters. Antioxidant activity (a), cortisol (b) and Igf-I (c). Data are presented as the mean ± SEM (n = 7–8). Statistically significant differences between normoxic and hypoxic fish are indicated (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01; two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by the Holm-Sidak test)
Fig. 4Schematic representation of the proposed model for integrative physiological responses of gilthead sea bream exposed to acute and severe hypoxia