| Literature DB >> 23758841 |
Antoine Stier1, Pierre Bize, Quentin Schull, Joffrey Zoll, François Singh, Bernard Geny, Frédéric Gros, Cathy Royer, Sylvie Massemin, François Criscuolo.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In contrast to mammalian erythrocytes, which have lost their nucleus and mitochondria during maturation, the erythrocytes of almost all other vertebrate species are nucleated throughout their lifespan. Little research has been done however to test for the presence and functionality of mitochondria in these cells, especially for birds. Here, we investigated those two points in erythrocytes of one common avian model: the zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata).Entities:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23758841 PMCID: PMC3686644 DOI: 10.1186/1742-9994-10-33
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Zool ISSN: 1742-9994 Impact factor: 3.172
Figure 1Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) pictures of mouse (a,b) and zebra finch (c,d) erythrocytes. a) Standard preparation (PBS) showing mouse erythrocytes with empty cytoplasm. b) Saponin treated mouse erythrocytes with empty cytoplasm. Note here that saponin treatment does not seem to deplete completely every cell from haemoglobin content, but alter the cell shape. c) Standard preparation showing zebra finch erythrocytes with apparent nucleus and occasional mitochondria (arrow). d) Saponin treated zebra finch erythrocytes, with apparent nucleus and numerous apparent mitochondria (arrows). Black bars represent 2 μm.
GEE model testing species (mouse or zebra finch) and treatment (Glu-mal, amytal or succinate) effects on mitochondrial respiration rate (VO)
| 297.1 | 1 | ||
| 261.6 | 1 | ||
| 548.8 | 2 | ||
| 503.9 | 2 |
Figure 2Mitochondrial respiration rate (VO) of mouse and zebra finch erythrocytes normalized by the protein content of the cell suspension. White bars represent baseline respiration rate (on glutamate-malate). Grey bars represent respiration rate after the inhibition of complex I (amytal), which is reversed by the addition of succinate (black bars) in zebra finch. Letters indicate significant differences between groups according to GEE Bonferroni post-hoc (N = 7 per species for each treatment).
GEE model testing species (mouse or zebra finch) and treatment (baseline or antimycin A) effects on mitochondrial superoxide production
| 1151.3 | 1 | ||
| 1129.4 | 1 | ||
| 550.6 | 1 | ||
| 568.5 | 1 |
Figure 3Mitochondrial superoxide production from mouse and zebra finch erythrocytes, expressed as change in mitosox red® relative fluorescence (RF) per minute. White bars represent baseline superoxide production and black bars represent superoxide production stimulated by the addition of an inhibitor of complex III (antimycin A). Letters indicate significant differences between groups according to GEE Bonferroni post-hoc (N = 7 per species for each treatment).
Figure 4Plasmatic reactive oxygen metabolites “ROMs” (black bars) and antioxidant capacity “OXY” (white bars) for mouse and zebra finch. Lower case letters indicate significant differences between groups for ROMs and capital letters for antioxidants levels, according to GLMs (see text for statistics, N = 60 per species).