OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to develop a machine learning-based system to determine the severity of Positive Valance symptoms for a patient, based on information included in their initial psychiatric evaluation. Severity was rated on an ordinal scale of 0-3 as follows: 0 (absent=no symptoms), 1 (mild=modest significance), 2 (moderate=requires treatment), 3 (severe=causes substantial impairment) by experts. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We treated the task of assigning Positive Valence severity as a text classification problem. During development, we experimented with regularized multinomial logistic regression classifiers, gradient boosted trees, and feedforward, fully-connected neural networks. We found both regularization and feature selection via mutual information to be very important in preventing models from overfitting the data. Our best configuration was a neural network with three fully connected hidden layers with rectified linear unit activations. RESULTS: Our best performing system achieved a score of 77.86%. The evaluation metric is an inverse normalization of the Mean Absolute Error presented as a percentage number between 0 and 100, where 100 means the highest performance. Error analysis showed that 90% of the system errors involved neighboring severity categories. CONCLUSION: Machine learning text classification techniques with feature selection can be trained to recognize broad differences in Positive Valence symptom severity with a modest amount of training data (in this case 600 documents, 167 of which were unannotated). An increase in the amount of annotated data can increase accuracy of symptom severity classification by several percentage points. Additional features and/or a larger training corpus may further improve accuracy.
OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to develop a machine learning-based system to determine the severity of Positive Valance symptoms for a patient, based on information included in their initial psychiatric evaluation. Severity was rated on an ordinal scale of 0-3 as follows: 0 (absent=no symptoms), 1 (mild=modest significance), 2 (moderate=requires treatment), 3 (severe=causes substantial impairment) by experts. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We treated the task of assigning Positive Valence severity as a text classification problem. During development, we experimented with regularized multinomial logistic regression classifiers, gradient boosted trees, and feedforward, fully-connected neural networks. We found both regularization and feature selection via mutual information to be very important in preventing models from overfitting the data. Our best configuration was a neural network with three fully connected hidden layers with rectified linear unit activations. RESULTS: Our best performing system achieved a score of 77.86%. The evaluation metric is an inverse normalization of the Mean Absolute Error presented as a percentage number between 0 and 100, where 100 means the highest performance. Error analysis showed that 90% of the system errors involved neighboring severity categories. CONCLUSION: Machine learning text classification techniques with feature selection can be trained to recognize broad differences in Positive Valence symptom severity with a modest amount of training data (in this case 600 documents, 167 of which were unannotated). An increase in the amount of annotated data can increase accuracy of symptom severity classification by several percentage points. Additional features and/or a larger training corpus may further improve accuracy.
Authors: John P Pestian; Pawel Matykiewicz; Jacqueline Grupp-Phelan; Sarah Arszman Lavanier; Jennifer Combs; Robert Kowatch Journal: AMIA Annu Symp Proc Date: 2008-11-06
Authors: R H Perlis; D V Iosifescu; V M Castro; S N Murphy; V S Gainer; J Minnier; T Cai; S Goryachev; Q Zeng; P J Gallagher; M Fava; J B Weilburg; S E Churchill; I S Kohane; J W Smoller Journal: Psychol Med Date: 2011-06-20 Impact factor: 7.723
Authors: John P Pestian; Pawel Matykiewicz; Michelle Linn-Gust; Brett South; Ozlem Uzuner; Jan Wiebe; K Bretonnel Cohen; John Hurdle; Christopher Brew Journal: Biomed Inform Insights Date: 2012-01-30
Authors: Christophe Lemey; Aziliz Le Glaz; Yannis Haralambous; Deok-Hee Kim-Dufor; Philippe Lenca; Romain Billot; Taylor C Ryan; Jonathan Marsh; Jordan DeVylder; Michel Walter; Sofian Berrouiguet Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2021-05-04 Impact factor: 5.428