Literature DB >> 28692069

The structure of vanadium nitrogenase reveals an unusual bridging ligand.

Daniel Sippel1, Oliver Einsle1.   

Abstract

Nitrogenases catalyze the reduction of dinitrogen (N2) gas to ammonium at a complex heterometallic cofactor. This most commonly occurs at the FeMo cofactor (FeMoco), a [Mo-7Fe-9S-C] cluster whose exact reactivity and substrate-binding mode remain unknown. Alternative nitrogenases replace molybdenum with either vanadium or iron and differ in reactivity, most prominently in the ability of vanadium nitrogenase to reduce CO to hydrocarbons. Here we report the 1.35-Å structure of vanadium nitrogenase from Azotobacter vinelandii. The 240-kDa protein contains an additional α-helical subunit that is not present in molybdenum nitrogenase. The FeV cofactor (FeVco) is a [V-7Fe-8S-C] cluster with a homocitrate ligand to vanadium. Unexpectedly, it lacks one sulfide ion compared to FeMoco, which is replaced by a bridging ligand, likely a μ-1,3-carbonate. The anion fits into a pocket within the protein that is obstructed in molybdenum nitrogenase, and its different chemical character helps to rationalize the altered chemical properties of this unique N2- and CO-fixing enzyme.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28692069      PMCID: PMC5563456          DOI: 10.1038/nchembio.2428

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Chem Biol        ISSN: 1552-4450            Impact factor:   15.040


Introduction

Nitrogenase is the only biological catalyst for the reductive fixation of atmospheric dinitrogen (N2) into bioavailable ammonium (NH4+). Its reaction is equivalent to the industrial Haber-Bosch process, but its extraordinary ability to break the stable N2 triple bond at ambient temperature and pressure is unmatched.1,2 Nitrogenase is a two-component complex that drives catalysis with low-potential electrons from central metabolism, supported by extensive ATP hydrolysis.3,4 Electrons are delivered to a [4Fe:4S] cluster in the Fe protein component that then binds ATP and consequently associates with the N2-reducing component. The Fe protein then hydrolyzes ATP and transfers an electron via an [8Fe:7S] relay, the P-cluster, to a complex active site cofactor where substrate reduction takes place. Known nitrogenases share a single evolutionary origin, and it is primarily the chemical nature of this cofactor that defines three classes, the Mo-, V- and Fe-dependent nitrogenases.5 Most organisms employ a heterometallic cluster containing iron and molybdenum, the FeMo cofactor (FeMoco). This [Mo:7Fe:9S:C] moiety includes a homocitrate ligand to molybdenum, and understanding its structure and functionality has been an ongoing challenge for decades.6 Early studies on A. vinelandii indicated that Mo was not essential for nitrogen fixation in this organism,7 and deletion strains lacking the structural genes for molybdenum nitrogenase (ΔnifHDK) retained the capacity for diazotrophic growth.8,9 The alternative nitrogenase of Azotobacter chroococcum requires vanadium,10 and isolation of a vanadium nitrogenase was reported shortly thereafter from A. vinelandii 11 and A. chroococcum.12 The vnf gene cluster for vanadium nitrogenase of A. vinelandii includes a distinct Fe protein (VnfH) and a catalytic VFe protein that contains an additional subunit, encoded by the vnfG gene.13 During ATP-dependent N2 fixation, vanadium nitrogenase diverts a larger portion of the electron flux from Fe protein towards H2 formation than molybdenum nitrogenase. This can lead to the VFe protein acting purely as a hydrogenase, but even under high pN2, the minimum observed reaction stoichiometry is for the A. chroococcum enzyme,14 as compared to only 1 H2 per N2 for molybdenum nitrogenase, at an expense of 16 MgATP. The specific activity of the A. vinelandii VFe protein is approximately 40 % of that of the MoFe protein.11,15,16 Unexpectedly, vanadium nitrogenase also reduces carbon monoxide (CO), a non-competitive inhibitor for all known substrates other than protons.17 CO is isoelectronic to N2, and non-competitive inhibition must not rule out a similar mode of binding to the cofactor, as CO can bind to a less-reduced state of the cluster where N2 binding will not occur. In contrast to the chemically comparable Fischer-Tropsch process,18 CO reduction by VFe protein does not proceed quantitatively to methane, CH4. It yields a variety of partially unsaturated hydrocarbon products with carbon chain lengths of 2–7,19 raising an interest in biological hydrocarbon formation for energy conservation.20 Spectroscopic studies with CO and molybdenum nitrogenase indicated that a complex is formed under turnover conditions,21,22 and its recent isolation and rapid crystallization represented the first structure of a ligand-bound state of FeMoco, where CO reversibly replaced a belt sulfide of the cofactor, leading to a μ2-carbonyl adduct bridging irons Fe2 and Fe6.23 The belt sulfide can also be replaced by selenide, Se2–, suggesting structural flexibility around the cofactor belt.24 The CO-reducing activity of the VFe protein exceeds that of the MoFe protein by a factor of 800, highlighting the functional differences between FeMoco and the corresponding FeVco.5 Spectroscopic data points towards structural analogy of both cofactors, but the differences in reactivity cannot be straightforwardly rationalized without detailed structural information. Mo availability regulates the induction of the V-dependent alternative,10 and while earlier studies largely relied on the aforementioned ΔnifHDK strain,8,9 later also in a histidine-tagged version,15 we recently established the preparation of VFe protein from unmodified, nitrogen-fixing A. vinelandii through depletion of Mo in the growth medium.25 We have produced VFe protein from the A. vinelandii type strain growing diazotrophically, with N2 as the sole nitrogen source, and isolated the enzyme under strict exclusion of dioxygen. Here, we have grown high-quality single crystals that allowed us to solve the structure of vanadium nitrogenase, including FeVco, by X-ray diffraction analysis.

Results

Overall architecture of vanadium nitrogenase

Crystals of A. vinelandii vanadium nitrogenase belonged to space group P1 and diffracted to 1.35 Å resolution using synchrotron radiation. The structure was solved by multiple-wavelength anomalous dispersion and established that VFe protein is a VnfD2K2G2 complex (Fig. 1a). The peptide chains of the three gene products were almost completely defined in the electron density map, with the model comprising residues 2–474 of VnfD, 12–475 of VnfK and 2–113 of VnfG (Supplementary Results, Supplementary Fig. 1). The core of the enzyme, a dimer of VnfDK heterodimers, corresponds to the NifD2K2 arrangement of the MoFe protein and aligned to it with a root-mean-squared deviation of 1.97 Å for all atoms (Fig, 1b,c and Supplementary Fig. 2). These subunits were composed of three consecutive Rossmann fold domains, hinting towards early gene duplication events during the genesis of a nitrogenase ancestor. In the MoFe protein, NifK contains an extended N terminus of approximately 50 residues that wraps around the neighboring NifD, stabilizing the heterodimer. This extension was absent in VnfK, replaced by an additional β-strand (residues 13–18) that complemented the parallel β-sheet of the third domain of the subunit.
Figure 1

Structure of vanadium nitrogenase.

(a) Cartoon representation of the A. vinelandii VnfD2K2G2 heterohexamer. Two copies of VnfG (blue) are located apically and are in exclusive contact with the adjacent VnfD subunits (yellow). The positions of the active site FeV cofactor and electron-transferring P-cluster, as well as the stabilizing Mg2+ cation are indicated in one monomer. (b) A schematic surface representation of VFe protein highlights the subunit arrangement and the positions of the VnfD, VnfK and VnfG peptides. (c) Molybdenum nitrogenase (NifD2K2) from the same organism shares the architecture of the core subunits, but differs markedly in aspects such as the prominent N termini of the NifK subunits. (d) Stereo representation of VnfG. The subunit is a bundle of four α-helices without substantial similarities to other known structures.

The metal clusters retained their position in the paralog, with the P-cluster residing in the VnfD/K interface, while the FeV cofactor was cradled within the VnfD subunit. In the MoFe protein, an additional metal site was assigned as a Ca2+ ion26 that under given conditions can be replaced by an additional iron.27 In A. vinelandii VFe protein, the same binding site is occupied by Mg2+, as evidenced by the bond distances and coordination geometry of the ion (Supplementary Fig. 3). The cation strengthens the interaction between the two VnfK subunits in the enzyme, while VnfD is only peripherally involved by providing two lysine residues to the second coordination sphere (Supplementary Fig. 3). The additional subunit of the VFe protein, VnfG, is a globular 113 amino acid polypeptide arranged into four α-helices that exclusively contacts VnfD, but not VnfK (Fig. 1d). The importance of VnfG for the reactivity of the VFe protein remains unclear, but an involvement in transferring FeV cofactor to the apoenzyme has been suggested, based on similarity to the proposed cofactor chaperones NafY from A. vinelandii28 and NifY of K. pneumoniae.29 In this scenario, VnfG may guide the mature cofactor to an apo-VnfD2K2 heterotetramer that is in an open conformation as seen in apo-NifD2K2 obtained from a ΔnifB strain,30 and subsequently remain bound as a constituent subunit of the enzyme. In the structure, VnfG is in close contact with the presumed insertion site for the cofactor into VFe protein at the third domain of VnfD (Fig. 1a, b). However, VnfG does not exhibit structural homologies with either the N-terminal or the core domain of the NafY protein implicated in cofactor delivery.28,31 A possible interference of VnfG with the binding of the Fe protein, VnfH2, during catalysis has been discussed,15 but as this docking site is likely retained at the VnfDK interface, the observed binding of VnfG is sufficiently remote not to interfere with the formation of a complex analogous to the one observed for molybdenum nitrogenase, even considering the variations seen in different nucleotide-bound or -free states (Supplementary Fig. 4).32,33

An [8Fe:7S] P-cluster in a redox equilibrium

Although a structural difference between the P-clusters of MoFe and VFe protein was previously suggested,15 most studies highlighted the similar properties of the electron relays that include conservation of all six cysteine ligands.14 In the VFe protein, the P-cluster is an [8Fe:7S] moiety that retains the unique topology of its counterpart in the MoFe protein. In its dithionite-reduced PN state it resembles two canonical [4Fe:4S] clusters fused via a shared sulfide ion (Fig. 2a,b). It resides on the twofold pseudosymmetry axis relating VnfD and VnfK (Fig. 2c) and is coordinated by residues C49, C75 and C138 from VnfD, as well as C31, C56 and C115 from VnfK. Upon oxidation, the P-cluster of the MoFe protein undergoes a conformational change of two Fe ions, Fe5 and Fe6, leading to the two-electron oxidized POx state.34 In the VFe protein, we observed a mixed redox state in electron density maps (Fig. 2b), as frequently observed in crystal structure analyses. Here, however, only Fe6 changed its position and broke its coordinative bond to the central sulfide S1 in favor of a new interaction with the harder ligand S153 in VnfK. By inference, the movement of only one Fe in the VFe protein might indicate that the cluster is oxidized only by one electron, which is in line with spectroscopic data:35 As the PN state of the cluster likely is the same diamagnetic all-ferrous species as in MoFe protein, the Fe6-oxidized center should then represent a P+1 site.
Figure 2

Electron-transferring P-cluster of vanadium nitrogenase.

(a) Stereo image of the [8Fe:7S] P-cluster in the reduced PN state. Three of the six cysteine ligands to the cluster originate from VnfD, and the others from VnfK, where S153K is the conserved ligand for Fe6 in the oxidized state of the cluster. (b) Detail of the lower half cubane of P-cluster, highlighting Fe5 and Fe6 that in molybdenum nitrogenase relocate upon oxidation to the POx state. The 2Fo–Fc electron density map (blue mesh) is contoured at the 2σ level. The green mesh shows a Fo–Fc electron density map contoured at the +6σ level, indicating the presence of a low proportion of a second conformation for Fe6. Contrary to the MoFe protein, no equivalent feature is visible at or near Fe5. The oxidized form thus likely represents a P1+ state as predicted by spectroscopy. (c) Arrangement of the subunits in a VnfDKG heterotrimer and location of the FeV cofactor (V) and the P-cluster (P). The P-cluster is centered precisely on the pseudo-twofold symmetry axis connecting VnfD and VnfK, while the VnfG subunit is in exclusive contact with VnfD.

Structure of the FeV cofactor

The catalytic FeV cofactor is nested within the three domains of the VnfD subunit. Like its counterpart in molybdenum nitrogenase it is linked to the protein only via two coordinative interactions, from Fe1 to C257 and from V to H423. A further, bidentate ligand to V is an organic homocitrate moiety, coordinating the metal in a mode and geometry that is virtually identical to the one observed in the MoFe protein. At 1.35 Å resolution the central carbide can be unambiguously assigned, confirming its previous detection by X-ray emission spectroscopy (Fig. 3a and Supplementary Fig. 5a,b).36 Interestingly, the exchange of Mo in FeMoco for V in FeVco implies only minimal changes of geometry and bond distances (Fig. 3b). With an octahedral ligand environment, the adjacent sulfides of the cofactor refined to distances of 2.36 Å (S1B), 2.37 Å (S3B) and 2.32 Å (S4B), almost indistinguishable from the corresponding distances in the structure of FeMoco – 2.36 Å, 2.37 Å and 2.35 Å, respectively – that was determined at 1.0 Å resolution.37 On the other hand, the V–Fe distances in FeVco are slightly longer than in FeMoco, averaging 2.77 Å vs. 2.69 Å, respectively, reflecting observations made in cubane model complexes.38 Consequently, the overall geometry of the FeV cofactor is slightly elongated, but otherwise very similar to the FeMo cofactor.
Figure 3

Structure of FeV cofactor.

(a) FeVco is a [V:7Fe:8S:C] cluster with a homocitrate ligand to the vanadium ion and a carbonate bridging Fe4 and Fe5. Iron ions (grey) and sulfide ions (yellow) are numbered. The cluster is coordinated to the protein via the amino acids C257 and H423 of VnfD. (b) Coordination of vanadium (stereo image). The coordinating atoms of H423 and the homocitrate moiety are labelled. (c) Ligation of Fe4 and Fe5 by carbonate. Average bond distances are given in Å.

A major difference between the two clusters, however, is the replacement of one belt sulfide (S3A) that in FeMoco links Fe4 and Fe5, by a second ligand that coordinates both irons in a μ-bridging fashion. It extends the Fe4–Fe5 distance from 2.61 Å in FeMoco to 2.76 Å in FeVco, in turn contributing to shortening the V–Fe5 distance (Fig. 3a,c). This ligand is a C3-symmetric tetraatomic molecule that is very well-defined in the electron density maps (Supplementary Fig. 5), with all bond distances refining to values of 1.27–1.3 Å. The electron density feature is fully explained with a carbonate ligand, CO32–, or with the isoelectronic nitrate, NO3– (Supplementary Fig. 6a). An analysis of the electron density features that had been key to identifying the central light atom of FeMoco as a carbide37 indicated that the three outer atoms are oxygen, but was inconclusive for the central atom at this resolution (Supplementary Fig. 6b). As VFe protein was isolated from A. vinelandii cells growing diazotrophically, we tentatively assigned the ligand as carbonate, whose twofold negative charge is also in better agreement with the displaced S2– than NO3–. Also, the presence of nitrate, as a nitrogen source, would effectively prevent further expression of nitrogenase and inhibit the activity of any nitrogenase already present through an ammonium-dependent switch-off. Other ligands that could alternatively be envisioned at this position are bicarbonate (HCO3–), acetate (H3C-COO–), and carbamate (H2N-COO–) (Supplementary Fig. 6a). In all cases, however, the bond distances should include a longer single bond that is not in agreement with the observed electron density (Supplementary Fig. 5b). The ligand is slightly kinked on the Fe4–Fe5 edge of FeVco, with its molecular plane not entirely parallel to the C3-pseudosymmetry axis of the cofactor (Fig. 3c and Supplementary Fig. 5c). CO32– is tightly cradled in a binding pocket in VnfD that is formed by a single loop of the protein chain, 335TGGPRL340, connecting beta strand β1 to helix α1 of the third domain of VnfD (Fig. 4a). The carbonate oxygen embedded in this loop forms three H-bonds, two of which link to the backbone amide nitrogens of G337 and R339, and the third to the hydroxyl group of T335. This coordination not only further excludes acetate as a ligand, but also carbamate, as G335 and R339 can act exclusively as H-bond donors. The question arises whether a similar exchange of a belt sulfide could possibly occur in FeMoco, especially as such a replacement with CO or Se2– was demonstrated.23,24 In the MoFe protein, the corresponding loop region in vicinity to S3A is 355IGGLRP360 of NifD. While similar in location and conformation, this loop has the positions of leucine and proline exchanged (Fig. 4b), so that residue P360 of NifD constricts the pocket, excluding the binding of a CO32– ligand. It is thus the difference in protein sequence – and here the simple swap of two amino acids – that opens a pocket for a carbonate in the VFe protein, but not in the MoFe protein. Note that in FeMoco atom S3B acts as an acceptor for three hydrogen bonds from G356, G357 and R359 in the binding loop and thus is also very tightly held within the protein.
Figure 4

The carbonate ligand to FeV cofactor.

(a) Stereo representation of the protein environment of the carbonate ligand, CO32–. The cluster is coordinated to the VnfD subunit of the enzyme via Fe1 to C257 and V to H423. (b) Detail of the binding pocket for the carbonate anion, coordinated by a short loop region present in both VFe protein (black) and MoFe protein (green). The swapping of a proline and a leucine in this loop leads to a slightly smaller pocket in the MoFe protein, where residue P360 would clash with the ligand.

Discussion

The unprecedented ligand to FeVco, accommodated through the leucine–proline swap in the sequence of VnfD, will substantially influence cluster reactivity. An exchange of the single, bridging weak-field ligand sulfide for the harder carbonate oxygens not only leads to an extension of the cluster, but also to perturbations of the overall electronic structure that alter its catalytic properties. Although the complexes of MoFe protein with CO and Se2– have established that an exchange of sulfide is possible, a recent theoretical study based on electrostatic calculations pointed out that the removal of a sulfide in the form of H2S is not facile and might represent the most energetically challenging step during catalysis.39 Hints toward the mechanisms of sulfide removal and carbonate insertion into FeVco arise from analysis of the vnf gene cluster of A. vinelandii.40 This cluster is a single locus on the A. vinelandii chromosome, presumably consisting of five operons with 17 open reading frames (Supplementary Fig. 7). Beside the structural genes for VFe protein and its corresponding Fe protein VnfH, the cluster contains distinct copies of the E, N and X genes likely responsible for vanadium insertion into the cofactor, the putative cofactor chaperone gene vnfY and the regulatory vnfU and vnfA genes. At least six additional open reading frames have no correspondence in the nif cluster. Three of these show homology to enzymes from the biogenesis of the cofactor molybdopterin that is utilized in molybdenum- and tungsten-containing proteins other than nitrogenase.41 Their presence in a cluster that is induced upon molybdenum starvation is puzzling at first, but the roles of the encoded proteins, homologs of MoeB, HesA and MoaD that we designate VnfP1, VnfP2 and VnfP3, might provide valuable clues. In molybdopterin biosynthesis, MoeB or HesA activate the terminal carboxylate of MoaD by adenylylation. MoaD is characterized by a C-terminal GG motif that is coupled to adenylate in a process related to ubiquitin activation by E1 enzymes.42 The MoeB–MoaD complex then receives sulfide from an unknown transferase to generate a terminal thiocarboxylate, from which the sulfide is passed to the cofactor precursor cyclic pyranopterin monophosphate (cPMP).41 The analogous system in the vnf cluster may not actually donate sulfide, but rather extract it from the cofactor precursor. The vnf cluster lacks a separate homolog of NifB, whose product, a topologically complete [8Fe:9S:C] cluster, thus must be the precursor for both FeMoco and FeVco.43 A means to extract belt sulfide S3A is thus required before carbonate binds, and VnfP1–3 may fulfil this role. VnfP1 would form a complex with the ubiquitin-like VnfP3, adenylylating its C-terminal glycine; the sulfur source for the formation of a thiocarboxylate might then be the cofactor precursor itself. Note that VnfP1 and VnfP2 share 32% sequence identity and may both be able to form a complex with VnfP3. However, VnfP2 lacks all the residues directly involved in ATP binding in the structure of E. coli MoeB,42 and it might thus interact more directly with the FeVco precursor in complex with VnfP3. Carbonate acts as a bridging carboxylate that may have been achieved more easily by a single point mutation introducing an Asp or Glu residue near the cofactor. However, this would have necessitated removal of S3A from the stable cofactor core in situ. We hypothesize that the machinery described above instead exchanges S3A for carbonate before the cofactor is inserted into VFe protein. Once in place and tightly coordinated, no further exchange of the carbonate ligand is possible. Carbonate coordination in FeVco is reminiscent of μ-carboxylate-bridged diiron enzymes such as hemerythrin or methane monooxygenase that bind or activate O2,44 although the rigid geometry of the nitrogenase cofactors results in a shorter Fe–Fe distance. With the structure of the VFe protein, attention is once more called to the unique belt sulfides of the nitrogenase cofactors. The first structure of a nitrogenase enzyme in a non-resting state was that of the MoFe protein with CO replacing S2B.23 Although CO is a non-competitive inhibitor of N2 reduction and consequently should bind to a different site (or state) than the substrate itself, this work provided a glimpse of flexibility within the otherwise highly stable and rigid cofactor. The present finding of carbonate replacing a sulfide is in line with this, although it is a different sulfide – S3A rather than S2B – that is exchanged. In the VFe protein, S2B bridges Fe2 and Fe6, and we explicitly do not imply that the location of carbonate highlights an actual substrate binding site. Its influence on the overall reactivity of the cluster, however, may explain the observed differences between FeMoco and FeVco. The structure of vanadium nitrogenase once more exemplifies the intricate fine-tuning of inorganic metal sites in biological systems that can inspire synthetic chemistry, and the particular reactivity of the VFe protein may open routes towards the future characterization of new substrate-bound states of the enzyme.

Online Methods

Growth of A. vinelandii and isolation of vanadium nitrogenase

Pure and unmodified vanadium nitrogenase VFe protein was produced as described elsewhere.25 In short, cells of A. vinelandii type strain were cultivated in molybdenum-free medium supplemented with Na3VO4 in the absence of a nitrogen source other than atmospheric N2. Cells were singled out on agar plates for re-inoculation of Mo-free medium from a single colony and this process was repeated for five times. For cell production, a 100 mL pre-culture of Mo-free Burke’s medium was inoculated with a single colony and grown overnight to then inoculate nitrogen-free main cultures of 500 mL. Cells were harvested by centrifugation at an optical density of 2–4 at 600 nm after approximately 18 h of aerobic growth. All following steps were carried out under strict exclusion of oxygen using modified Schlenk techniques or inert gas chambers. After cell lysis, the crude extract was subjected to two consecutive steps of anion exchange chromatography on HiTrap Q HP and Resource Q, respectively (GE Healthcare), followed by a final size-exclusion step on Superdex 200 (GE Healthcare). Pure VFe protein was concentrated to 30 mg·mL–1 and shock-frozen in liquid N2 for further use.

Crystallization and data collection

A. vinelandii VFe protein was crystallized by sitting drop vapor diffusion under the strict exclusion of dioxygen in an inert gas chamber containing a 95/5 % mixture of N2/H2 with < 1 ppm of O2. 1 μl of protein solution (5 mg·mL–1) was mixed with the same volume of a reservoir solution containing 10–13 % (w/v) of polyethylene glycol 8000, 15–20 % (v/v) of ethylene glycol, 0.03 M MgCl2, 0.1 mM ZnCl2, 5 mM Na2S2O4 and 0.1 M of HEPES/NaOH buffer at pH 7.5. The drop was equilibrated against reservoir solution in the sealed well of a 96-well crystallization plate (SwissSci). Three-dimensional single crystals of vanadium nitrogenase appeared within one week and were harvested after approximately two weeks with a nylon loop for immediate flash-cooling in liquid N2. Diffraction data were collected on beam line X06SA of the Swiss Light Source (Paul-Scherrer-Institute, Villigen, CH) using an Eiger 16M detector (Dectris). Data were indexed and integrated with XDS45 and scaled and merged with SCALA.46 Crystals of A. vinelandii VFe protein belonged to the triclinic space group P1, with unit cell dimensions of a = 75.3 Å, b = 79.8 Å and c = 107.0 Å, α = 84.°, β = 72.6° and γ = 75.2° and contained one complete VnfD2K2G2 heterohexamer per unit cell. For structure solution, datasets were collected to high multiplicity at and above the Fe K-edge, at wavelengths of 1.7413 Å (7120 eV, inflection) and 1.7357 Å (7143 eV, peak), together with a high-resolution remote data set at 1.000 Å (Supplementary Table 1).

Structure solution, model building and refinement

The peak data set was used to locate a total of 30 iron sites per unit cell using SHELXD.47 An initial inspection of the sites immediately revealed a correspondence to the two copies of the 8-Fe P-cluster and 2 copies of the 7-Fe cofactor, and we consequently proceeded to site refinement and phase calculations using programs of the PHENIX suite.48 Model building into the readily interpretable electron density maps was carried out with COOT,49 and the structure was refined with REFMAC5.50 Data collection and refinement statistics are summarized in Supplementary Table 1.
  46 in total

1.  The vanadium nitrogenase of Azotobacter chroococcum. Purification and properties of the VFe protein.

Authors:  R R Eady; R L Robson; T H Richardson; R W Miller; M Hawkins
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1987-05-15       Impact factor: 3.857

2.  Nucleotide sequences and mutational analysis of the structural genes for nitrogenase 2 of Azotobacter vinelandii.

Authors:  R D Joerger; T M Loveless; R N Pau; L A Mitchenall; B H Simon; P E Bishop
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 3.490

Review 3.  Nitrogenase FeMo cofactor: an atomic structure in three simple steps.

Authors:  Oliver Einsle
Journal:  J Biol Inorg Chem       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 3.358

4.  Structure of ADP x AIF4(-)-stabilized nitrogenase complex and its implications for signal transduction.

Authors:  H Schindelin; C Kisker; J L Schlessman; J B Howard; D C Rees
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1997-05-22       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Features and development of Coot.

Authors:  P Emsley; B Lohkamp; W G Scott; K Cowtan
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2010-03-24

6.  The nifY product of Klebsiella pneumoniae is associated with apodinitrogenase and dissociates upon activation with the iron-molybdenum cofactor.

Authors:  M J Homer; T D Paustian; V K Shah; G P Roberts
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 3.490

7.  Genome sequence of Azotobacter vinelandii, an obligate aerobe specialized to support diverse anaerobic metabolic processes.

Authors:  João C Setubal; Patricia dos Santos; Barry S Goldman; Helga Ertesvåg; Guadelupe Espin; Luis M Rubio; Svein Valla; Nalvo F Almeida; Divya Balasubramanian; Lindsey Cromes; Leonardo Curatti; Zijin Du; Eric Godsy; Brad Goodner; Kaitlyn Hellner-Burris; José A Hernandez; Katherine Houmiel; Juan Imperial; Christina Kennedy; Timothy J Larson; Phil Latreille; Lauren S Ligon; Jing Lu; Mali Maerk; Nancy M Miller; Stacie Norton; Ina P O'Carroll; Ian Paulsen; Estella C Raulfs; Rebecca Roemer; James Rosser; Daniel Segura; Steve Slater; Shawn L Stricklin; David J Studholme; Jian Sun; Carlos J Viana; Erik Wallin; Baomin Wang; Cathy Wheeler; Huijun Zhu; Dennis R Dean; Ray Dixon; Derek Wood
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2009-05-08       Impact factor: 3.490

8.  The three-dimensional structure of the core domain of Naf Y from Azotobacter vinelandii determined at 1.8-A resolution.

Authors:  David H Dyer; Luis M Rubio; James B Thoden; Hazel M Holden; Paul W Ludden; Ivan Rayment
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2003-05-16       Impact factor: 5.157

9.  Nitrogen fixation in molybdenum-deficient continuous culture by a strain of Azotobacter vinelandii carrying a deletion of the structural genes for nitrogenase (nifHDK).

Authors:  P E Bishop; M E Hawkins; R R Eady
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1986-09-01       Impact factor: 3.857

10.  Ligand binding to the FeMo-cofactor: structures of CO-bound and reactivated nitrogenase.

Authors:  Thomas Spatzal; Kathryn A Perez; Oliver Einsle; James B Howard; Douglas C Rees
Journal:  Science       Date:  2014-09-26       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  47 in total

1.  Evaluation of the Catalytic Relevance of the CO-Bound States of V-Nitrogenase.

Authors:  Chi Chung Lee; Jarett Wilcoxen; Caleb J Hiller; R David Britt; Yilin Hu
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 15.336

2.  Crystal structure of VnfH, the iron protein component of vanadium nitrogenase.

Authors:  Michael Rohde; Christian Trncik; Daniel Sippel; Stefan Gerhardt; Oliver Einsle
Journal:  J Biol Inorg Chem       Date:  2018-08-23       Impact factor: 3.358

3.  Electro- and Solar-Driven Fuel Synthesis with First Row Transition Metal Complexes.

Authors:  Kristian E Dalle; Julien Warnan; Jane J Leung; Bertrand Reuillard; Isabell S Karmel; Erwin Reisner
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2019-02-15       Impact factor: 60.622

4.  Energy Transduction in Nitrogenase.

Authors:  Lance C Seefeldt; Brian M Hoffman; John W Peters; Simone Raugei; David N Beratan; Edwin Antony; Dennis R Dean
Journal:  Acc Chem Res       Date:  2018-08-10       Impact factor: 22.384

5.  Special Issue on Nitrogenases and Homologous Systems.

Authors:  Yilin Hu; Markus W Ribbe
Journal:  Chembiochem       Date:  2020-05-19       Impact factor: 3.164

Review 6.  Reduction of Substrates by Nitrogenases.

Authors:  Lance C Seefeldt; Zhi-Yong Yang; Dmitriy A Lukoyanov; Derek F Harris; Dennis R Dean; Simone Raugei; Brian M Hoffman
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2020-03-16       Impact factor: 60.622

7.  Iron Carbide-Sulfide Carbonyl Clusters.

Authors:  Liang Liu; Thomas B Rauchfuss; Toby J Woods
Journal:  Inorg Chem       Date:  2019-06-11       Impact factor: 5.165

Review 8.  Reactivity, Mechanism, and Assembly of the Alternative Nitrogenases.

Authors:  Andrew J Jasniewski; Chi Chung Lee; Markus W Ribbe; Yilin Hu
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2020-03-04       Impact factor: 60.622

9.  So Close, yet Sulfur Away: Opening the Nitrogenase Cofactor Structure Creates a Binding Site.

Authors:  Kazimer L Skubi; Patrick L Holland
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 3.162

10.  Mechanism of N2 Reduction Catalyzed by Fe-Nitrogenase Involves Reductive Elimination of H2.

Authors:  Derek F Harris; Dmitriy A Lukoyanov; Sudipta Shaw; Phil Compton; Monika Tokmina-Lukaszewska; Brian Bothner; Neil Kelleher; Dennis R Dean; Brian M Hoffman; Lance C Seefeldt
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2018-01-17       Impact factor: 3.162

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.