Literature DB >> 28690039

Retained Antibiotic Spacers After Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Resections: High Complication Rates.

Stephen M Petis1, Kevin I Perry1, Mark W Pagnano1, Daniel J Berry1, Arlen D Hanssen1, Matthew P Abdel1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Prolonged retention of an antibiotic spacer is occasionally chosen during treatment of periprosthetic joint infections after total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of our study was to evaluate the outcome of extended spacer retention.
METHODS: We reviewed 1106 cases of periprosthetic joint infection after THA (n = 308) and TKA (n = 798) and identified 17 (5.5%) retained hip and 34 (4.3%) retained knee spacers. Most patients (35 of 51, 69%) underwent spacer retention because they were medically unfit for further surgery. The remaining patients (16 of 51, 31%) had acceptable function and forewent further surgery. Competing risk analyses, with death as the competing risk, determined the cumulative incidence of reinfection and spacer revision. Radiographic analysis and clinical outcomes were analyzed.
RESULTS: The 2-year cumulative incidence for reinfection was 7% for retained hip and 13% for retained knee spacers. The cumulative incidence for all-cause spacer revision was 28% at 4 years for hips and 21% at 2 years for knees. The most common complications were implant migration and femoral spacer subsidence in the hip cohort, and supracondylar femur fractures and spacer dislocations in the knee cohort. The cumulative incidence for radiographic signs of mechanical failure was 72% and 87% at late follow-up for the hip and knee groups, respectively. The latest Harris Hip Score and Knee Society Score were 62 and 63, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Antibiotic spacer retention is a rare event in the course of planned 2-stage treatment of infected THA or TKA. Failure secondary to recurrent infection is uncommon; however, failure for mechanical reasons is frequent and clinical outcomes are relatively poor.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  antibiotic spacer retention; periprosthetic joint infection; prosthetic joint infection; resection; total hip arthroplasty; total knee arthroplasty

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28690039     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.05.053

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  10 in total

Review 1.  Mechanical complications of hip spacers: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Andrea Sambri; Michele Fiore; Claudia Rondinella; Lorenzo Morante; Azzurra Paolucci; Claudio Giannini; Calogero Alfonso; Massimiliano De Paolis
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2022-04-12       Impact factor: 2.928

2.  Mechanical failure of articulating polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) spacers in two-stage revision hip arthroplasty: the risk factors and the impact on interim function.

Authors:  Fu-Shine Yang; Yu-Der Lu; Cheng-Ta Wu; Kier Blevins; Mel S Lee; Feng-Chih Kuo
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2019-08-14       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 3.  Hip Spacers in Two-Stage Revision for Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Review of Literature.

Authors:  Alessandro Rava; Matteo Bruzzone; Umberto Cottino; Emilio Enrietti; Roberto Rossi
Journal:  Joints       Date:  2019-10-11

4.  Articulating vs Static Spacers for Native Knee Infection in the Setting of Degenerative Joint Disease.

Authors:  Jessica Hooper; Prerna Arora; Shanthi Kappagoda; James I Huddleston; Stuart B Goodman; Derek F Amanatullah
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2021-03-11

5.  Restoration of the hip geometry after two-stage exchange with intermediate resection arthroplasty for periprosthetic joint infection.

Authors:  Jan Hubert; Frank Timo Beil; Tim Rolvien; Christian Ries; Stephan Frosch; Dominik Saul; Thelonius Hawellek
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  [Individual megaspacers in two-stage revision of infected total hip arthroplasty-clinical and functional results after 2 years : Individual metal-endoskeleton cement spacer (iMECS)].

Authors:  Martin Ellenrieder; Bastian Surmann; Andreas Enz; Sören Henning Toch; Robert Lenz; Wolfram Mittelmeier
Journal:  Orthopadie (Heidelb)       Date:  2021-10-30

7.  Failure analysis of articulating polymethyl methacrylate spacers in two-stage revision total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Maxime Jaubert; Marie Le Baron; Christophe Jacquet; Antoine Couvreur; Maxime Fabre-Aubrespy; Xavier Flecher; Matthieu Ollivier; Jean-Noel Argenson
Journal:  Bone Jt Open       Date:  2022-06

8.  A Mid-term Follow-up Study on the Reimplantation of Autoclaved Femoral and Tibial Components as Spacers for Treating Infected Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Peng Li; Zhiqi Zhu; Xiangyang Tang; Zhanjun Shi
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2022-07-27       Impact factor: 2.279

9.  Analysis of perioperative outcomes in hip resection arthroplasty.

Authors:  Alireza K Nazemi; Alexander Upfill-Brown; Armin Arshi; Troy Sekimura; Erik N Zeegen; Edward J McPherson; Alexandra I Stavrakis
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 2.928

10.  REVIEW OF TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY AND THE BRAZILIAN UNIFIED HEALTH SYSTEM: A NATIONAL PROBLEM.

Authors:  Lucas da Ponte Melo; Guilherme Augusto Losso; Guilherme Henrique Ricardo da Costa; José Ricardo Pécora; Marco Kawamura Demange; Camilo Partezani Helito
Journal:  Acta Ortop Bras       Date:  2019 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 0.513

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.