Literature DB >> 28689292

Estimating the Economic Value of Information for Screening in Disseminating and Targeting Effective School-based Preventive Interventions: An Illustrative Example.

Stephen S Johnston1,2, David S Salkever3,4, Nicholas S Ialongo5, Eric P Slade6,7, Elizabeth A Stuart5,8.   

Abstract

When candidates for school-based preventive interventions are heterogeneous in their risk of poor outcomes, an intervention's expected economic net benefits may be maximized by targeting candidates for whom the intervention is most likely to yield benefits, such as those at high risk of poor outcomes. Although increasing amounts of information about candidates may facilitate more accurate targeting, collecting information can be costly. We present an illustrative example to show how cost-benefit analysis results from effective intervention demonstrations can help us to assess whether improved targeting accuracy justifies the cost of collecting additional information needed to make this improvement.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cost-benefit; Implementation; Information; Prevention; Screening

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28689292      PMCID: PMC5641236          DOI: 10.1007/s10488-017-0811-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adm Policy Ment Health        ISSN: 0894-587X


  12 in total

1.  Addressing uncertainty in medical cost-effectiveness analysis implications of expected utility maximization for methods to perform sensitivity analysis and the use of cost-effectiveness analysis to set priorities for medical research.

Authors:  D Meltzer
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 3.883

2.  Utility of TOCA-R scores during the elementary school years in identifying later violence among adolescent males.

Authors:  Hanno Petras; Howard D Chilcoat; Philip J Leaf; Nicholas S Ialongo; Sheppard G Kellam
Journal:  J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 8.829

3.  The utility of elementary school TOCA-R scores in identifying later criminal court violence among adolescent females.

Authors:  Hanno Petras; Nicholas Ialongo; Sharon F Lambert; Sandra Barrueco; Cindy M Schaeffer; Howard Chilcoat; Sheppard Kellam
Journal:  J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 8.829

Review 4.  Iatrogenic effects of group treatment for antisocial youths.

Authors:  Bahr Weiss; Annalise Caron; Shelly Ball; Julie Tapp; Margaret Johnson; John R Weisz
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  2005-12

5.  Enhancing the net benefits of disseminating efficacious prevention programs: a note on target efficiency with illustrative examples.

Authors:  David S Salkever; Stephen Johnston; Mustafa C Karakus; Nicholas S Ialongo; Eric P Slade; Elizabeth A Stuart
Journal:  Adm Policy Ment Health       Date:  2008-03-15

6.  The economic analysis of prevention: an illustration involving children's behavior problems.

Authors:  E Michael Foster; Damon E Jones
Journal:  J Ment Health Policy Econ       Date:  2007-12

7.  Sensitivity analysis and the expected value of perfect information.

Authors:  J C Felli; G B Hazen
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1998 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.583

8.  Costs and effectiveness of the fast track intervention for antisocial behavior.

Authors:  E Michael Foster
Journal:  J Ment Health Policy Econ       Date:  2010-09

9.  Initial impact of the Fast Track prevention trial for conduct problems: I. The high-risk sample. Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  1999-10

10.  The use of multiple versus single assessment time points to improve screening accuracy in identifying children at risk for later serious antisocial behavior.

Authors:  Hanno Petras; Jacquelyn A Buckley; Jeannie-Marie S Leoutsakos; Elizabeth A Stuart; Nicholas S Ialongo
Journal:  Prev Sci       Date:  2013-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.