Literature DB >> 11148867

Addressing uncertainty in medical cost-effectiveness analysis implications of expected utility maximization for methods to perform sensitivity analysis and the use of cost-effectiveness analysis to set priorities for medical research.

D Meltzer1.   

Abstract

This paper examines the objectives for performing sensitivity analysis in medical cost-effectiveness analysis and the implications of expected utility maximization for methods to perform such analyses. The analysis suggests specific approaches for optimal decision making under uncertainty and specifying such decisions for subgroups based on the ratio of expected costs to expected benefits, and for valuing research using value of information calculations. Though ideal value of information calculations may be difficult, certain approaches with less stringent data requirements may bound the value of information. These approaches suggest methods by which the vast cost-effectiveness literature may help inform priorities for medical research.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11148867     DOI: 10.1016/s0167-6296(00)00071-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Health Econ        ISSN: 0167-6296            Impact factor:   3.883


  19 in total

1.  Prioritization in comparative effectiveness research: the CANCERGEN Experience.

Authors:  Rahber Thariani; William Wong; Josh J Carlson; Louis Garrison; Scott Ramsey; Patricia A Deverka; Laura Esmail; Sneha Rangarao; Carolyn J Hoban; Laurence H Baker; David L Veenstra
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  Future challenges for the economic evaluation of healthcare: patient preferences, risk attitudes and beyond.

Authors:  John F P Bridges
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Economic analysis of nutrition interventions for chronic disease prevention: methods, research, and policy.

Authors:  John B Wong; Paul M Coates; Robert M Russell; Johanna T Dwyer; James A Schuttinga; Barbara A Bowman; Sarah A Peterson
Journal:  Nutr Rev       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 7.110

4.  Quantitative Methods for Valuing Comparative Effectiveness Information.

Authors:  Anirban Basu; David Meltzer
Journal:  Biopharm Rep       Date:  2010

5.  Diagnostic testing and treatment under ambiguity: using decision analysis to inform clinical practice.

Authors:  Charles F Manski
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-01-22       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  A systematic and critical review of the evolving methods and applications of value of information in academia and practice.

Authors:  Lotte Steuten; Gijs van de Wetering; Karin Groothuis-Oudshoorn; Valesca Retèl
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.981

7.  Sufficient trial size to inform clinical practice.

Authors:  Charles F Manski; Aleksey Tetenov
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-09-06       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Cost-effectiveness of Antihypertensive Medication: Exploring Race and Sex Differences Using Data From the REasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke Study.

Authors:  Gabriel S Tajeu; Stephen Mennemeyer; Nir Menachemi; Robert Weech-Maldonado; Meredith Kilgore
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 2.983

9.  Private manufacturers' thresholds to invest in comparative effectiveness trials.

Authors:  Anirban Basu; David Meltzer
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2012-10-01       Impact factor: 4.981

10.  Comparative effectiveness research for antipsychotic medications: how much is enough?

Authors:  David O Meltzer; Anirban Basu; Herbert Y Meltzer
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2009-07-21       Impact factor: 6.301

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.