Literature DB >> 20737537

Screening for major depression in cancer outpatients: the diagnostic accuracy of the 9-item patient health questionnaire.

Parvez Thekkumpurath1, Jane Walker, Isabella Butcher, Laura Hodges, Annet Kleiboer, Mark O'Connor, Lucy Wall, Gordon Murray, Kurt Kroenke, Michael Sharpe.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Systematic screening for depression has been recommended for patients who have medical conditions like cancer. The 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) is becoming widely used, but its diagnostic accuracy has not yet been tested in a cancer patient population. In this article, the authors report on the performance of the PHQ-9 as a screening instrument for major depressive disorder (MDD) in patients with cancer.
METHODS: Data obtained from a depression screening service for patients who were attending clinics of a Regional Cancer Centre in Edinburgh, United Kingdom were used. Patients had completed both the PHQ-9 and a 2-stage procedure to identify cases of MDD. Performance of the PHQ-9 in identifying cases of MDD was determined using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.
RESULTS: Data were available on 4264 patients. When scored as a continuous measure, the PHQ-9 performed well with an area under the ROC curve of 0.94 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.93-0.95). A cutoff score of ≥ 8 provided a sensitivity of 93% (95% CI, 89%-95%), a specificity of 81% (95% CI, 80%-82%), a positive predictive value (PPV) of 25%, and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 99% and could be considered optimum in a screening context. The PHQ-9 did not perform as well when it was scored using an algorithm with a sensitivity of 56% (95% CI, 55%-57%), a specificity of 96% (95% CI, 95%-97%), a PPV of 52%, and an NPV of 97%.
CONCLUSIONS: The PHQ-9 scored as a continuous measure with a cutoff score of ≥ 8 performed well in identifying MDD in cancer patients and should be considered as a screening instrument in this population.
© 2010 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20737537     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.25514

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  55 in total

Review 1.  Psychosocial care in cancer.

Authors:  Samantha B Artherholt; Jesse R Fann
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 5.285

2.  Hypnosis for symptom management in women with breast cancer: a pilot study.

Authors:  Mark P Jensen; Julie R Gralow; Alan Braden; Kevin J Gertz; Jesse R Fann; Karen L Syrjala
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Hypn       Date:  2012

3.  Depressive symptoms and health-related quality of life in breast cancer survivors.

Authors:  Cielito C Reyes-Gibby; Karen O Anderson; Phuong Kanh Morrow; Sanjay Shete; Sohela Hassan
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2011-11-07       Impact factor: 2.681

4.  Risk factors for depression in patients undergoing hematopoietic cell transplantation.

Authors:  Samantha B Artherholt; Fangxin Hong; Donna L Berry; Jesse R Fann
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2014-03-18       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Screening for depressed mood in patients with cancer using the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory: investigation of a practical approach for the oncologist.

Authors:  Desiree Jones; Elisabeth G Vichaya; Charles S Cleeland; Lorenzo Cohen; Seema M Thekdi; Xin Shelley Wang; Michael J Fisch
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 3.840

6.  Clinic-based depression screening in lung cancer patients using the PHQ-2 and PHQ-9 depression questionnaires: a pilot study.

Authors:  J Michael Randall; Rochelle Voth; Erin Burnett; Lyudmila Bazhenova; Wayne A Bardwell
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2013-01-17       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 7.  Depression screening in patients with brain tumors: a review.

Authors:  Aiste Pranckeviciene; Adomas Bunevicius
Journal:  CNS Oncol       Date:  2015

8.  Depressive symptoms among cancer patients in a Philippine tertiary hospital: prevalence, factors, and influence on health-related quality of life.

Authors:  Jocelyn C Que; Teresa T Sy Ortin; Karen O Anderson; Consuelo B Gonzalez-Suarez; Thomas W Feeley; Cielito C Reyes-Gibby
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 2.947

9.  Physical problem list accompanying the distress thermometer: Its associations with psychological symptoms and survival in patients with metastatic lung cancer.

Authors:  Daniel C McFarland; Devika R Jutagir; Andrew Miller; Christian Nelson
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2020-03-11       Impact factor: 3.894

10.  Quantitative tool to evaluate the somatic burden due to chemotherapy-induced adverse events: the somatic burden score.

Authors:  Michael Koehler; Thomas Fischer; Siegfried Kropf; Joerg Frommer
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2014-07-05       Impact factor: 3.603

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.