Literature DB >> 28687865

[Forefoot relief with shoe inserts : Effects of different construction strategies].

H Baur1, N Merz2, A Muster2, G Flückiger3, A Hirschmüller4,5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Shoe inserts and shoe modifications are used to reduce plantar peak pressure. The effects of different shoe inserts and shoe construction strategies for relief of the forefoot have not yet been sufficiently evaluated.
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to analyze the effects of shoe inserts and shoe construction strategies (e.g. metatarsal pad, forefoot cushioning and control) and shoe modifications (e.g. flexible or stiff) on the peak plantar pressure in the forefoot region.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this study 15 healthy subjects were recruited. Plantar pressure distribution was measured using an in-shoe system during walking (3.5km∙h-1) on a treadmill and the average plantar peak pressure (kPa) in the forefoot was calculated. The statistics for testing the hypothesis were carried out using 2‑factorial ANOVA with repeat measurements (factors: shoe, insert; α = 0.05).
RESULTS: The metatarsal pad and forefoot cushioning led to a reduction of peak pressure, which was statistically significant compared to the control condition (p = 0.009). No differences were observed between both shoe inserts (p > 0.05). A comparison between stiff and flexible shoes revealed a statistically significant pressure reduction in favor of stiff shoes (p = 0.0001). The metatarsal pad led to a peak pressure increase in the midfoot of 12% and by 21% compared to control and forefoot cushioning, respectively. DISCUSSION: A peak pressure reduction in the forefoot can be achieved with a metatarsal pad or with cushioning; however, the metatarsal pad resulted in a subsequent increase in midfoot pressure. Moreover, shoe construction is crucial because a stiff shoe contributes to a better peak pressure reduction compared to a flexible shoe. Prospective clinical studies should be carried out to prove whether this results in beneficial effects for patients with metatarsalgia.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Foot orthoses; Forefoot; Metatarsal bones; Shoes

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 28687865     DOI: 10.1007/s00393-017-0347-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Z Rheumatol        ISSN: 0340-1855            Impact factor:   1.372


  24 in total

1.  Plantar pressures in rheumatoid arthritis using prefabricated metatarsal padding.

Authors:  Lorraine Jackson; Jodi Binning; Julia Potter
Journal:  J Am Podiatr Med Assoc       Date:  2004 May-Jun

2.  The Pedar in-shoe system: repeatability and normal pressure values.

Authors:  A B Putti; G P Arnold; L Cochrane; R J Abboud
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2006-07-07       Impact factor: 2.840

3.  Does the use of orthoses improve self-reported pain and function measures in patients with plantar fasciitis? A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sae Yong Lee; Patrick McKeon; Jay Hertel
Journal:  Phys Ther Sport       Date:  2008-11-20       Impact factor: 2.365

4.  Metatarsal bars more effective than metatarsal pads in reducing impulse on the second metatarsal head.

Authors:  Annie Deshaies; Patrice Roy; Panagiotis D Symeonidis; Bernard LaRue; Norman Murphy; Eric Anctil
Journal:  Foot (Edinb)       Date:  2011-06-08

5.  Effect of custom-made and prefabricated insoles on plantar loading parameters during running with and without fatigue.

Authors:  Angel Gabriel Lucas-Cuevas; Pedro Pérez-Soriano; Salvador Llana-Belloch; Cecili Macián-Romero; Daniel Sánchez-Zuriaga
Journal:  J Sports Sci       Date:  2014-05-13       Impact factor: 3.337

6.  [Problem cases of metatarsalgia].

Authors:  B Kunze; N Wülker
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 7.  Biomechanical analysis of the effect of orthotic shoe inserts: a review of the literature.

Authors:  M Razeghi; M E Batt
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 11.136

8.  Pressure distribution under symptom-free feet during barefoot standing.

Authors:  P R Cavanagh; M M Rodgers; A Iiboshi
Journal:  Foot Ankle       Date:  1987-04

9.  Effect of metatarsal pads and their positioning: a quantitative assessment.

Authors:  R Hayda; M D Tremaine; K Tremaine; S Banco; K Teed
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 2.827

10.  Contoured, prefabricated foot orthoses demonstrate comparable mechanical properties to contoured, customised foot orthoses: a plantar pressure study.

Authors:  Anthony C Redmond; Karl B Landorf; Anne-Maree Keenan
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2009-06-16       Impact factor: 2.303

View more
  1 in total

1.  Plantar pressure changes in hindfoot relief devices of different designs.

Authors:  F Mazur; B Swoboda; H D Carl; C Lutter; M Engelhardt; M W Hoppe; T Hotfiel; C Grim
Journal:  J Exp Orthop       Date:  2019-02-07
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.