Literature DB >> 28687845

Wayfinding and Glaucoma: A Virtual Reality Experiment.

Fábio B Daga1, Eduardo Macagno2, Cory Stevenson2, Ahmed Elhosseiny3, Alberto Diniz-Filho1, Erwin R Boer1, Jürgen Schulze4, Felipe A Medeiros1.   

Abstract

Purpose: Wayfinding, the process of determining and following a route between an origin and a destination, is an integral part of everyday tasks. The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of glaucomatous visual field loss on wayfinding behavior using an immersive virtual reality (VR) environment.
Methods: This cross-sectional study included 31 glaucomatous patients and 20 healthy subjects without evidence of overall cognitive impairment. Wayfinding experiments were modeled after the Morris water maze navigation task and conducted in an immersive VR environment. Two rooms were built varying only in the complexity of the visual scene in order to promote allocentric-based (room A, with multiple visual cues) versus egocentric-based (room B, with single visual cue) spatial representations of the environment. Wayfinding tasks in each room consisted of revisiting previously visible targets that subsequently became invisible.
Results: For room A, glaucoma patients spent on average 35.0 seconds to perform the wayfinding task, whereas healthy subjects spent an average of 24.4 seconds (P = 0.001). For room B, no statistically significant difference was seen on average time to complete the task (26.2 seconds versus 23.4 seconds, respectively; P = 0.514). For room A, each 1-dB worse binocular mean sensitivity was associated with 3.4% (P = 0.001) increase in time to complete the task. Conclusions: Glaucoma patients performed significantly worse on allocentric-based wayfinding tasks conducted in a VR environment, suggesting visual field loss may affect the construction of spatial cognitive maps relevant to successful wayfinding. VR environments may represent a useful approach for assessing functional vision endpoints for clinical trials of emerging therapies in ophthalmology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28687845      PMCID: PMC5499646          DOI: 10.1167/iovs.17-21849

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  23 in total

1.  Losing sight of the bigger picture: peripheral field loss compresses representations of space.

Authors:  Francesca C Fortenbaugh; John C Hicks; Lei Hao; Kathleen A Turano
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-08-10       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Cognitive maps in rats and men.

Authors:  E C TOLMAN
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1948-07       Impact factor: 8.934

3.  What is the minimum field of view required for efficient navigation?

Authors:  Shirin E Hassan; John C Hicks; Hao Lei; Kathleen A Turano
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-06-11       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Mobility performance in glaucoma.

Authors:  K A Turano; G S Rubin; H A Quigley
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 4.799

5.  Longitudinal changes in quality of life and rates of progressive visual field loss in glaucoma patients.

Authors:  Felipe A Medeiros; Carolina P B Gracitelli; Erwin R Boer; Robert N Weinreb; Linda M Zangwill; Peter N Rosen
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 12.079

6.  Virtual environment navigation tasks and the assessment of cognitive deficits in individuals with brain injury.

Authors:  Sharon A Livingstone; Ronald W Skelton
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2007-07-17       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Covert shifts of attention precede involuntary eye movements.

Authors:  Matthew S Peterson; Arthur F Kramer; David E Irwin
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2004-04

8.  Mental imagery skills and topographical orientation in humans: a correlation study.

Authors:  Liana Palermo; Giuseppe Iaria; Cecilia Guariglia
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2008-04-22       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 9.  Glaucoma and disability: which tasks are affected, and at what stage of disease?

Authors:  Pradeep Ramulu
Journal:  Curr Opin Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.761

10.  Ecological validity of virtual environments to assess human navigation ability.

Authors:  Ineke J M van der Ham; Annemarie M E Faber; Matthijs Venselaar; Marc J van Kreveld; Maarten Löffler
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-05-27
View more
  4 in total

1.  Simulation of Oscillopsia in Virtual Reality.

Authors:  David Randall; Helen Griffiths; Gemma Arblaster; Anne Bjerre; John Fenner
Journal:  Br Ir Orthopt J       Date:  2018-06-19

2.  Macular Pigment and Visual Function in Patients With Glaucoma: The San Diego Macular Pigment Study.

Authors:  Fábio B Daga; Nara G Ogata; Felipe A Medeiros; Rachel Moran; Jeffrey Morris; Linda M Zangwill; Robert N Weinreb; John M Nolan
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Development of a quantitative evaluation system for visuo-motor control in three-dimensional virtual reality space.

Authors:  Woong Choi; Jongho Lee; Naoki Yanagihara; Liang Li; Jaehyo Kim
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-09-07       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 4.  Virtual Reality and Augmented Reality in Ophthalmology: A Contemporary Prospective.

Authors:  Mina Iskander; Titilola Ogunsola; Rithambara Ramachandran; Richard McGowan; Lama A Al-Aswad
Journal:  Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila)       Date:  2021 May-Jun 01
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.