| Literature DB >> 28686662 |
Dinh Ng-Nguyen1,2, Mark A Stevenson1, Pierre Dorny3, Sarah Gabriël4, Tinh Van Vo5, Van-Anh Thi Nguyen2, Trong Van Phan2, Sze Fui Hii6, Rebecca J Traub1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Taenia solium, the cause of neurocysticercosis (NCC), has significant socioeconomic impacts on communities in developing countries. This disease, along with taeniasis is estimated to infect 2.5 to 5 million people globally. Control of T. solium NCC necessitates accurate diagnosis and treatment of T. solium taeniasis carriers. In areas where all three species of Taenia tapeworms (T. solium, Taenia saginata and Taenia asiatica) occur sympatrically, conventional microscope- and copro-antigen based diagnostic methods are unable to distinguish between these three Taenia species. Molecular diagnostic tools have been developed to overcome this limitation; however, conventional PCR-based techniques remain unsuitable for large-scale deployment in community-based surveys. Moreover, a real-time PCR (qPCR) for the discrimination of all three species of Taenia in human stool does not exist. This study describes the development and validation of a new triplex Taq-Man probe-based qPCR for the detection and discrimination of all three Taenia human tapeworms in human stools collected from communities in the Central Highlands of Vietnam. The diagnostic characteristics of the test are compared with conventional Kato Katz (KK) thick smear and copro-antigen ELISA (cAgELISA) method utilizing fecal samples from a community based cross-sectional study. Using this new multiplex real-time PCR we provide an estimate of the true prevalence of taeniasis in the source population for the community based cross-sectional study. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPALEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28686662 PMCID: PMC5517074 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0005743
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS Negl Trop Dis ISSN: 1935-2727
Primers and probes for multiplex qPCR.
| Target species | Oligonucleotide | GenBank accession # | Target gene | Sequence (5’ - 3’) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Forward primer | LC004200 | ITS-1 | TGTTAGCAGCAGTTGTGATG | |
| Reverse primer | CCAACTCCACCCAGATTGA | |||
| Probe | Cy5/CCAGCGCTG/TAO/CTGTTGACTGA/IAbRQSp | |||
| Forward primer of | AB107234 and AB271695 | COX-1 | GAGTACCAACAGGAATAAAGGT | |
| Reverse primer of | CAACACAATACCAGTCACACC | |||
| Probe of | FAM/AA+CTA+T+C+CA+CCA/IAbkFQ | |||
| Probe of | HEX/AA+CTA+T+T+CA+C+CA/IAbkFQ | |||
| EHV4 | Forward primer | M26171 | Glycoprotein gB | GATGACACTAGCGACTTCGA |
| Reverse primer | CAGGGCAGAAACCATAGACA | |||
| Probe | ROX/TTTCGCGTGCCTCCTCCAG/IAbRQSp |
“+” symbols found in the probe sequences indicate the presence of a Locked Nucleic Acid Base (LNA); IAbRQSp: Iowa Black RQ-Sp; IAbkFQ: Iowa Black FQ
gBlocks positive controls.
| Organisms | GenBank accession number | Gene | Star-end position | Amplicon length |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LC004200 | ITS-1 | 92–183 | 235 bp | |
| AB107234 | COX-1 | 938–1077 | ||
| AB271695 | COX-1 | 938–1077 | 140 bp |
1 Original position in GenBank
Fig 1Map of study site.
Map of Dak Lak province showing districts where sampling was carried out.
Parameters of prior information.
| Parameter of interest | Mode | Lower limit 95% | |
|---|---|---|---|
| T3qPCR | Se | 0.95 | 0.89 |
| Sp | 0.99 | 0.94 | |
| cAgELISA | Se | 0.85 | 0.62 |
| Sp | 0.92 | 0.90 | |
| KK | Se | 0.53 | 0.11 |
| SP | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
*Modes and lower limits for test characteristic of T3qPCR calculated as the average of the estimates elicited from each of the six experts
Fig 2Ct value comparison of multiplex to singleplex qPCR.
Assay optimization to determine effects of multiplex PCR set up on sensitivity and efficiency of PCRs compared to singleplex PCR using gBlock gene fragment (IDT Technologies) standard curve controls containing all PCR products.
Results of three diagnostic tests for taeniasis.
| T3qPCR | KK | cAgELISA (OD>0.2) | cAgELISA (OD> = 0.55) | Individuals | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 306 |
| 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 13 |
0: Negative; 1: Positive. Raw data available in S1 Data.
Fig 3Infection status of human Taenia species.
The venn diagram shows the proportional infection of Taenia spp. in Dak Lak province, Vietnam. Raw data available in S1 Data.
The agreement statistics of T3qPCR, cAgELISA and KK for the detection of Taenia spp. in stool.
| T3qPCR | Kappa (95% CI) | Observed agreement (%) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positive | Negative | Total | ||||
| cAgELISA (OD >0.2) | Positive | 8 | 13 | 21 | 0.32 (0.21–0.43) | 91.8 |
| Negative | 15 | 306 | 321 | |||
| Total | 23 | 319 | 342 | |||
| cAgELISA (OD ≥0.55) | Positive | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0.86 (0.75–0.96) | 99.7 |
| Negative | 1 | 338 | 339 | |||
| Total | 4 | 338 | 342 | |||
| KK | Positive | 7 | 0 | 7 | 0.45 (0.36–0.53) | 95.3 |
| Negative | 16 | 319 | 335 | |||
| Total | 23 | 319 | 342 | |||
a Kappa agreement level: K<0.2 Poor; 0.21–0.40 Fair; 0.41–0.60 Moderate; 0.61–0.80 Good; 0.81–1.00 Very good. Raw data available in S1 Data.
The estimated characteristics of three diagnostic tests for the detection of Taenia spp. in stool.
| Test method | Parameter of interest | Median | 95% credible interval (CrI) |
|---|---|---|---|
| T3qPCR | Se | 0.94 | 0.88–0.98 |
| Sp | 0.98 | 0.95–1.00 | |
| cAgELISA(OD ≥0.55) | Se | 0.82 | 0.58–0.95 |
| Sp | 0.91 | 0.85–0.96 | |
| KK | Se | 0.52 | 0.07–0.94 |
| Sp | 0.94 | 0.89–0.98 |