Literature DB >> 28685089

Comparing the cost-effectiveness of FOLFIRINOX, nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine, gemcitabine and S-1 for the treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer.

Machiko Kurimoto1, Michio Kimura1, Eiseki Usami1, Mina Iwai1, Tatsuya Hirose1, Shiori Kawachi1, Tomoaki Yoshimura1.   

Abstract

The recommended chemotherapy regimens for pancreatic cancer include the combination of 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin, oxaliplatin and irinotecan (FOLFIRINOX), nab-paclitaxel (nab-PTX) plus gemcitabine (GEM), GEM alone and tegafur/gimeracil/oteracil potassium (S-1) alone. Although the cost-effectiveness of metastatic pancreatic cancer chemotherapies has been extensively investigated, to the best of our knowledge, no study has specifically compared the cost-effectiveness among FOLFIRINOX, nab-PTX + GEM, GEM and S-1 regimens to date. The aim of the present study was to examine the cost-effectiveness of these four regimens. The expected costs were calculated based on data from patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer who were treated with the FOLFIRINOX, nab-PTX + GEM, GEM alone or S-1 alone. The median survival time (MST) from randomized controlled trials in the literature was used to evaluate the therapeutic effect of these regimens. The cost-effectiveness ratio was calculated using expected costs and MST for these four regimens. The expected costs per patient for the FOLFIRINOX, nab-PTX + GEM, GEM or S-1 regimens were ¥6,361,191.4, ¥4,802,063.6, ¥540,091.4 and ¥528,514.6, respectively, and the cost-effectiveness ratios per month were ¥642,544.6/MST, ¥470,790.5/MST, ¥81,832.0/MST and ¥55,633.1/MST, respectively. In conclusion, the nab-PTX + GEM and FOLFIRINOX regimens were associated with a high therapeutic efficacy and high cost. The GEM regimen exhibited a lower therapeutic efficacy compared with the nab-PTX + GEM and FOLFIRINOX regimens, but the findings of this study indicated that the GEM and S-1 regimens were the most cost-effective regimens.

Entities:  

Keywords:  FOLFIRINOX; S-1; adverse event; cost-effectiveness; gemcitabine; metastatic pancreatic cancer; nab-paclitaxel

Year:  2017        PMID: 28685089      PMCID: PMC5492666          DOI: 10.3892/mco.2017.1278

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol        ISSN: 2049-9450


  16 in total

Review 1.  Economic Evaluations of First-Line Chemotherapy Regimens for Pancreatic Cancer: A Critical Review.

Authors:  Mahdi Gharaibeh; J Lyle Bootman; Ali McBride; Jennifer Martin; Ivo Abraham
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  FOLFIRINOX versus gemcitabine for metastatic pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Thierry Conroy; Françoise Desseigne; Marc Ychou; Olivier Bouché; Rosine Guimbaud; Yves Bécouarn; Antoine Adenis; Jean-Luc Raoul; Sophie Gourgou-Bourgade; Christelle de la Fouchardière; Jaafar Bennouna; Jean-Baptiste Bachet; Faiza Khemissa-Akouz; Denis Péré-Vergé; Catherine Delbaldo; Eric Assenat; Bruno Chauffert; Pierre Michel; Christine Montoto-Grillot; Michel Ducreux
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Efficacy according to biomarker status of cetuximab plus FOLFOX-4 as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: the OPUS study.

Authors:  C Bokemeyer; I Bondarenko; J T Hartmann; F de Braud; G Schuch; A Zubel; I Celik; M Schlichting; P Koralewski
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2011-01-12       Impact factor: 32.976

4.  Clinical Practice Guidelines for Pancreatic Cancer 2016 From the Japan Pancreas Society: A Synopsis.

Authors:  Koji Yamaguchi; Takuji Okusaka; Kyoko Shimizu; Junji Furuse; Yoshinori Ito; Keiji Hanada; Tooru Shimosegawa; Kazuichi Okazaki
Journal:  Pancreas       Date:  2017 May/Jun       Impact factor: 3.327

5.  Cost-utility analysis of nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-paclitaxel) in combination with gemcitabine in metastatic pancreatic cancer in Spain: results of the PANCOSTABRAX study.

Authors:  Alfredo Carrato; Pilar García; Rafael López; Teresa Macarulla; Fernando Rivera; Javier Sastre; Joana Gostkorzewicz; Patricia Benedit; Ferran Pérez-Alcántara
Journal:  Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2015-05-19       Impact factor: 2.217

6.  Cetuximab plus irinotecan, fluorouracil, and leucovorin as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: updated analysis of overall survival according to tumor KRAS and BRAF mutation status.

Authors:  Eric Van Cutsem; Claus-Henning Köhne; István Láng; Gunnar Folprecht; Marek P Nowacki; Stefano Cascinu; Igor Shchepotin; Joan Maurel; David Cunningham; Sabine Tejpar; Michael Schlichting; Angela Zubel; Ilhan Celik; Philippe Rougier; Fortunato Ciardiello
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-04-18       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  [Cost-effectiveness analysis of chemotherapy with GEM or S-1 for patients with non-resectable pancreatic cancer].

Authors:  Tatsuya Kurihara; Mariko Kobayashi; Mari Kogo; Keiichiro Yoneyama; Nanako Ito; Tomiko Sunaga; Kazuo Konishi; Michio Imawari; Takashi Tobe; Yuji Kiuchi
Journal:  Gan To Kagaku Ryoho       Date:  2010-04

8.  Bevacizumab in combination with oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy as first-line therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomized phase III study.

Authors:  Leonard B Saltz; Stephen Clarke; Eduardo Díaz-Rubio; Werner Scheithauer; Arie Figer; Ralph Wong; Sheryl Koski; Mikhail Lichinitser; Tsai-Shen Yang; Fernando Rivera; Felix Couture; Florin Sirzén; Jim Cassidy
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-04-20       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Increased survival in pancreatic cancer with nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine.

Authors:  Daniel D Von Hoff; Thomas Ervin; Francis P Arena; E Gabriela Chiorean; Jeffrey Infante; Malcolm Moore; Thomas Seay; Sergei A Tjulandin; Wen Wee Ma; Mansoor N Saleh; Marion Harris; Michele Reni; Scot Dowden; Daniel Laheru; Nathan Bahary; Ramesh K Ramanathan; Josep Tabernero; Manuel Hidalgo; David Goldstein; Eric Van Cutsem; Xinyu Wei; Jose Iglesias; Markus F Renschler
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Phase II study of FOLFIRINOX for chemotherapy-naïve Japanese patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Takuji Okusaka; Masafumi Ikeda; Akira Fukutomi; Tatsuya Ioka; Junji Furuse; Shinichi Ohkawa; Hiroyuki Isayama; Narikazu Boku
Journal:  Cancer Sci       Date:  2014-09-29       Impact factor: 6.716

View more
  3 in total

1.  A multicenter propensity score analysis of FOLFIRINOX vs gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel administered to patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer: results from the NAPOLEON study.

Authors:  Taiga Otsuka; Tsuyoshi Shirakawa; Mototsugu Shimokawa; Futa Koga; Yasunori Kawaguchi; Yujiro Ueda; Junichi Nakazawa; Azusa Komori; Satoshi Otsu; Shiho Arima; Masaru Fukahori; Yoshinobu Okabe; Akitaka Makiyama; Hiroki Taguchi; Takuya Honda; Taro Shibuki; Kenta Nio; Yasushi Ide; Toshihiko Mizuta; Kenji Mitsugi; Norio Ureshino
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2021-01-23       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Real-World Cost-Effectiveness of First-Line Gemcitabine Plus Nab-Paclitaxel vs FOLFIRINOX in Patients With Advanced Pancreatic Cancer.

Authors:  Vanessa Arciero; Jin Luo; Ambica Parmar; Wei Fang Dai; Jaclyn M Beca; Michael J Raphael; Wanrudee Isaranuwatchai; Steven Habbous; Mina Tadrous; Craig C Earle; Jim J Biagi; Nicole Mittmann; Jessica Arias; Scott Gavura; Kelvin K W Chan
Journal:  JNCI Cancer Spectr       Date:  2022-07-01

3.  Area of residual tumor (ART) can predict prognosis after post neoadjuvant therapy resection for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Satoshi Okubo; Motohiro Kojima; Yoko Matsuda; Masayoshi Hioki; Yasuhiro Shimizu; Hirochika Toyama; Soichiro Morinaga; Naoto Gotohda; Katsuhiko Uesaka; Genichiro Ishii; Mari Mino-Kenudson; Shinichiro Takahashi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-11-20       Impact factor: 4.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.