Literature DB >> 33483857

A multicenter propensity score analysis of FOLFIRINOX vs gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel administered to patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer: results from the NAPOLEON study.

Taiga Otsuka1,2, Tsuyoshi Shirakawa3,4, Mototsugu Shimokawa5,6, Futa Koga7, Yasunori Kawaguchi7,8, Yujiro Ueda9, Junichi Nakazawa10, Azusa Komori11, Satoshi Otsu11, Shiho Arima12, Masaru Fukahori13, Yoshinobu Okabe13, Akitaka Makiyama14,15, Hiroki Taguchi16,17, Takuya Honda18, Taro Shibuki19,20, Kenta Nio21, Yasushi Ide22, Toshihiko Mizuta19,23, Kenji Mitsugi24, Norio Ureshino1,25.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin (FOLFIRINOX, FFX) and gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP) are considered standard treatments for patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer. Direct comparisons are not available that establish which is optimal.
METHODS: We conducted a propensity score-adjusted analysis of patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer to identify the therapeutic advantages of these standard therapies. We used clinical data as part of a multicenter retrospective study of patients with unresectable or recurrent pancreatic cancer treated with FFX or GnP (NAPOLEON study).
RESULTS: FFX and GnP were initially administered to 102 and 153 patients, respectively. The GnP group comprised more patients of advanced age, worse performance status, lower body mass index, recurrence, and lower albumin concentrations. Median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were 11.5 months and 5.8 months in the FFX group and 11.1 months and 5.9 months in the GnP group, respectively. Propensity score-adjusted analysis indicated that the administration of FFX or GnP was not independently associated with OS (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.06; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.76-1.47; P = 0.73). Similarly, the difference in PFS was not significant between groups (adjusted HR 0.93; 95% CI 0.68-1.26; P = 0.62). Gastrointestinal disorders were more common in the FFX group, whereas the frequencies of hematological, nervous system, and skin disorders were higher in the GnP group.
CONCLUSION: The efficacies of FFX and GnP were comparable, although safety profiles differed and should be considered in selecting treatment.

Entities:  

Keywords:  FOLFIRINOX; Gemcitabine; Nab-paclitaxel; Pancreatic cancer; Propensity score analysis

Year:  2021        PMID: 33483857     DOI: 10.1007/s10147-021-01859-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 1341-9625            Impact factor:   3.402


  24 in total

1.  Cancer of the pancreas: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up.

Authors:  M Ducreux; A Sa Cuhna; C Caramella; A Hollebecque; P Burtin; D Goéré; T Seufferlein; K Haustermans; J L Van Laethem; T Conroy; D Arnold
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 32.976

2.  Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer: ASCO Clinical Practice Guideline Update.

Authors:  Davendra P S Sohal; Erin B Kennedy; Alok Khorana; Mehmet S Copur; Christopher H Crane; Ignacio Garrido-Laguna; Smitha Krishnamurthi; Cassadie Moravek; Eileen M O'Reilly; Philip A Philip; Ramesh K Ramanathan; Joseph T Ruggiero; Manish A Shah; Susan Urba; Hope E Uronis; Michelle W Lau; Daniel Laheru
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  FOLFIRINOX versus gemcitabine for metastatic pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Thierry Conroy; Françoise Desseigne; Marc Ychou; Olivier Bouché; Rosine Guimbaud; Yves Bécouarn; Antoine Adenis; Jean-Luc Raoul; Sophie Gourgou-Bourgade; Christelle de la Fouchardière; Jaafar Bennouna; Jean-Baptiste Bachet; Faiza Khemissa-Akouz; Denis Péré-Vergé; Catherine Delbaldo; Eric Assenat; Bruno Chauffert; Pierre Michel; Christine Montoto-Grillot; Michel Ducreux
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Clinical Practice Guidelines for Pancreatic Cancer 2016 From the Japan Pancreas Society: A Synopsis.

Authors:  Koji Yamaguchi; Takuji Okusaka; Kyoko Shimizu; Junji Furuse; Yoshinori Ito; Keiji Hanada; Tooru Shimosegawa; Kazuichi Okazaki
Journal:  Pancreas       Date:  2017 May/Jun       Impact factor: 3.327

Review 5.  Pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  David P Ryan; Theodore S Hong; Nabeel Bardeesy
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2014-09-11       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Randomized phase III study of gemcitabine plus S-1, S-1 alone, or gemcitabine alone in patients with locally advanced and metastatic pancreatic cancer in Japan and Taiwan: GEST study.

Authors:  Hideki Ueno; Tatsuya Ioka; Masafumi Ikeda; Shinichi Ohkawa; Hiroaki Yanagimoto; Narikazu Boku; Akira Fukutomi; Kazuya Sugimori; Hideo Baba; Kenji Yamao; Tomotaka Shimamura; Masayuki Sho; Masayuki Kitano; Ann-Lii Cheng; Kazuhiro Mizumoto; Jen-Shi Chen; Junji Furuse; Akihiro Funakoshi; Takashi Hatori; Taketo Yamaguchi; Shinichi Egawa; Atsushi Sato; Yasuo Ohashi; Takuji Okusaka; Masao Tanaka
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-04-01       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Japan Pancreatic Cancer Registry; 30th year anniversary: Japan Pancreas Society.

Authors:  Shinichi Egawa; Hiroki Toma; Hiroaki Ohigashi; Takuji Okusaka; Akimasa Nakao; Takashi Hatori; Hiroyuki Maguchi; Akio Yanagisawa; Masao Tanaka
Journal:  Pancreas       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 3.327

8.  Erlotinib plus gemcitabine compared with gemcitabine alone in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: a phase III trial of the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group.

Authors:  Malcolm J Moore; David Goldstein; John Hamm; Arie Figer; Joel R Hecht; Steven Gallinger; Heather J Au; Pawel Murawa; David Walde; Robert A Wolff; Daniel Campos; Robert Lim; Keyue Ding; Gary Clark; Theodora Voskoglou-Nomikos; Mieke Ptasynski; Wendy Parulekar
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-04-23       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  A phase II study of modified FOLFIRINOX for chemotherapy-naïve patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Masato Ozaka; Hiroshi Ishii; Tosiya Sato; Makoto Ueno; Masafumi Ikeda; Kazuhiro Uesugi; Naohiro Sata; Kouichirou Miyashita; Nobumasa Mizuno; Kunihiro Tsuji; Takuji Okusaka; Junji Furuse
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  2018-04-09       Impact factor: 3.333

Review 10.  Pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Terumi Kamisawa; Laura D Wood; Takao Itoi; Kyoichi Takaori
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2016-01-30       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  3 in total

1.  Frailty is associated with poor prognosis after resection for pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Kosuke Mima; Hiromitsu Hayashi; Shigeki Nakagawa; Takashi Matsumoto; Shotaro Kinoshita; Kazuki Matsumura; Fumimasa Kitamura; Norio Uemura; Yosuke Nakao; Rumi Itoyama; Takayoshi Kaida; Katsunori Imai; Yo-Ichi Yamashita; Hideo Baba
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  WEE1 Inhibition in Combination With Targeted Agents and Standard Chemotherapy in Preclinical Models of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Sarah J Hartman; Stacey M Bagby; Betelehem W Yacob; Dennis M Simmons; Morgan MacBeth; Christopher H Lieu; S Lindsey Davis; Alexis D Leal; John J Tentler; Jennifer R Diamond; S Gail Eckhardt; Wells A Messersmith; Todd M Pitts
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 6.244

3.  Equivalent Efficacy but Different Safety Profiles of Gemcitabine Plus Nab-Paclitaxel and FOLFIRINOX in Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer.

Authors:  Ilario Giovanni Rapposelli; Andrea Casadei-Gardini; Caterina Vivaldi; Giulia Bartolini; Laura Bernardini; Alessandro Passardi; Giovanni Luca Frassineti; Valentina Massa; Alessandro Cucchetti
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2021-05-22
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.