Robert E Burke1,2,3, Emily Lawrence1, Amy Ladebue1, Roman Ayele1, Brandi Lippmann1, Ethan Cumbler3, Rebecca Allyn4, Jacqueline Jones5. 1. Denver-Seattle Center of Innovation, Denver Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Denver, Colorado. 2. Hospital Medicine Section, Department of Medicine, Denver Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Denver, Colorado. 3. Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado. 4. Department of Medicine, Denver Health and Hospital Authority, Denver, Colorado. 5. College of Nursing, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To understand how hospital-based clinicians evaluate older adults in the hospital and decide who will be transferred to a skilled nursing facility (SNF) for postacute care. DESIGN: Semistructured interviews paired with a qualitative analytical approach informed by Social Constructivist theory. SETTING: Inpatient care units in three hospitals. Purposive sampling was used to maximize variability in hospitals, units within hospitals, and staff on those units. PARTICIPANTS: Clinicians (hospitalists, nurses, therapists, social workers, case managers) involved in evaluation and decision-making regarding postacute care (N = 25). MEASUREMENTS: Central themes related to clinician evaluation and discharge decision-making. RESULTS: Clinicians described pressure to expedite evaluation and discharge decisions, resulting in the use of SNFs as a "safety net" for older adults being discharged from the hospital. The lack of hospital-based clinician knowledge of SNF care practices, quality, or patient outcomes resulted in lack of a standardized evaluation process or a clear primary decision-maker. CONCLUSION: Hospital clinician evaluation and decision-making about postacute care in SNFs may be characterized as rushed, without a clear system or framework for making decisions and uninformed by knowledge of SNF or patient outcomes in those discharged to SNFs. This leads to SNFs being used as a "safety net" for many older adults. As hospitals and SNFs are increasingly held jointly accountable for outcomes of individuals transitioning between hospitals and SNFs, novel solutions for improving evaluation and decision-making are urgently needed.
OBJECTIVE: To understand how hospital-based clinicians evaluate older adults in the hospital and decide who will be transferred to a skilled nursing facility (SNF) for postacute care. DESIGN: Semistructured interviews paired with a qualitative analytical approach informed by Social Constructivist theory. SETTING: Inpatient care units in three hospitals. Purposive sampling was used to maximize variability in hospitals, units within hospitals, and staff on those units. PARTICIPANTS: Clinicians (hospitalists, nurses, therapists, social workers, case managers) involved in evaluation and decision-making regarding postacute care (N = 25). MEASUREMENTS: Central themes related to clinician evaluation and discharge decision-making. RESULTS: Clinicians described pressure to expedite evaluation and discharge decisions, resulting in the use of SNFs as a "safety net" for older adults being discharged from the hospital. The lack of hospital-based clinician knowledge of SNF care practices, quality, or patient outcomes resulted in lack of a standardized evaluation process or a clear primary decision-maker. CONCLUSION: Hospital clinician evaluation and decision-making about postacute care in SNFs may be characterized as rushed, without a clear system or framework for making decisions and uninformed by knowledge of SNF or patient outcomes in those discharged to SNFs. This leads to SNFs being used as a "safety net" for many older adults. As hospitals and SNFs are increasingly held jointly accountable for outcomes of individuals transitioning between hospitals and SNFs, novel solutions for improving evaluation and decision-making are urgently needed.
Authors: Susan P Bell; Eduard E Vasilevskis; Avantika A Saraf; J M L Jacobsen; Sunil Kripalani; Amanda S Mixon; John F Schnelle; Sandra F Simmons Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2016-04-05 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Cari R Levy; Manaf Zargoush; Allison E Williams; Arthur R Williams; Phan Giang; Janusz Wojtusiak; Raya E Kheirbek; Farrokh Alemi Journal: Gerontologist Date: 2015-08-18
Authors: Joseph G Ouslander; Ilkin Naharci; Gabriella Engstrom; Jill Shutes; David G Wolf; Maria Rojido; Ruth Tappen; David Newman Journal: J Am Med Dir Assoc Date: 2016-06-24 Impact factor: 4.669
Authors: Joseph G Ouslander; Ilkin Naharci; Gabriella Engstrom; Jill Shutes; David G Wolf; Graig Alpert; Carolina Rojido; Ruth Tappen; David Newman Journal: J Am Med Dir Assoc Date: 2016-01-14 Impact factor: 4.669
Authors: Jennifer L Carnahan; Lev Inger; Robert S Young; James E Slaven; Alexia M Torke Journal: J Am Med Dir Assoc Date: 2018-08-07 Impact factor: 4.669
Authors: Emily Lawrence; Jessica-Jean Casler; Jacqueline Jones; Chelsea Leonard; Amy Ladebue; Roman Ayele; Ethan Cumbler; Rebecca Allyn; Robert E Burke Journal: Health Care Manage Rev Date: 2020 Oct/Dec
Authors: Kristine E Ensrud; Allyson M Kats; John T Schousboe; Brent C Taylor; Peggy M Cawthon; Teresa A Hillier; Kristine Yaffe; Steve R Cummings; Jane A Cauley; Lisa Langsetmo Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2018-04-23 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Robert E Burke; Anne Canamucio; Thomas J Glorioso; Anna E Barón; Kira L Ryskina Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2019-05-10 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Christine D Jones; Jacqueline Jones; Kathryn H Bowles; Linda Flynn; Frederick A Masoudi; Eric A Coleman; Cari Levy; Rebecca S Boxer Journal: J Am Med Dir Assoc Date: 2019-02-22 Impact factor: 4.669
Authors: Marina S McCreight; Heather M Gilmartin; Chelsea A Leonard; Ashlea L Mayberry; Lynette R Kelley; Brandi K Lippmann; Andrew S Coy; Tiffany A Radcliff; Murray J Côté; Robert E Burke Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2019-05 Impact factor: 5.128