Joseph G Ouslander1, Ilkin Naharci2, Gabriella Engstrom3, Jill Shutes4, David G Wolf5, Graig Alpert6, Carolina Rojido7, Ruth Tappen3, David Newman3. 1. Charles E. Schmidt College of Medicine, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL; Christine E. Lynn College of Nursing, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL. Electronic address: Joseph.Ouslander@fau.edu. 2. Charles E. Schmidt College of Medicine, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL; Gulhane School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey. 3. Christine E. Lynn College of Nursing, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL. 4. Charles E. Schmidt College of Medicine, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL. 5. Charles E. Schmidt College of Medicine, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL; Barry University, Miami, FL. 6. Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL. 7. Charles E. Schmidt College of Medicine, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL; Christine E. Lynn College of Nursing, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Performing root cause analyses (RCA) on transfers of skilled nursing facility (SNF) patients to acute hospitals can help identify opportunities for care process improvements and education that may help prevent unnecessary emergency department (ED) visits, hospitalizations, and hospital readmissions. OBJECTIVES: To describe the results of structured, retrospective RCAs performed by SNF staff on hospital transfers to identify lessons learned for reducing these transfers. DESIGN: SNFs enrolled in a randomized, controlled implementation trial of the INTERACT (Interventions to Reduce Acute Care Transfers) quality improvement program submitted RCAs on hospital transfers during a 12-month implementation period. SETTING: SNFs from across the United States that volunteered and met the enrollment criteria for the implementation trial. PARTICIPANTS: Sixty-four of 88 SNFs randomized to the intervention group performed and submitted retrospective RCAs on hospital transfers. INTERVENTIONS: SNFs received education and technical assistance in INTERACT implementation. MEASURES: Data were summarized from the INTERACT Quality Improvement (QI) tool, a structured, retrospective RCA on hospital transfers. RESULTS: A total of 4856 QI tools were submitted during the 12-month implementation period. Most transfers were precipitated by multiple symptoms and signs, many of them nonspecific. Patient and/or family preference or insistence was noted to have played a role in 16% of the transfers. Hospital transfers were relatively equally distributed among days of the week, and 29% occurred on the night or evening shift. Approximately 1 in 5 transfers occurred within 6 days of SNF admission from a hospital, and 1 in 10 occurred within 2 days of SNF admission. After completing the RCA, SNF staff identified 1044 (23%) of the transfers as potentially preventable. Common reasons for these ratings included recognition that the condition could have been detected earlier and/or could have been managed safely in the SNF, and that earlier advance care planning and discussions with patients and families about preferences for care may have prevented some transfers. CONCLUSION: Summarizing findings from RCAs of transfers of SNF patients to acute hospitals can provide important insights into areas of focus for care process improvements and related education that may help prevent unnecessary ED visits, hospital admissions, and readmissions.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Performing root cause analyses (RCA) on transfers of skilled nursing facility (SNF) patients to acute hospitals can help identify opportunities for care process improvements and education that may help prevent unnecessary emergency department (ED) visits, hospitalizations, and hospital readmissions. OBJECTIVES: To describe the results of structured, retrospective RCAs performed by SNF staff on hospital transfers to identify lessons learned for reducing these transfers. DESIGN: SNFs enrolled in a randomized, controlled implementation trial of the INTERACT (Interventions to Reduce Acute Care Transfers) quality improvement program submitted RCAs on hospital transfers during a 12-month implementation period. SETTING: SNFs from across the United States that volunteered and met the enrollment criteria for the implementation trial. PARTICIPANTS: Sixty-four of 88 SNFs randomized to the intervention group performed and submitted retrospective RCAs on hospital transfers. INTERVENTIONS: SNFs received education and technical assistance in INTERACT implementation. MEASURES: Data were summarized from the INTERACT Quality Improvement (QI) tool, a structured, retrospective RCA on hospital transfers. RESULTS: A total of 4856 QI tools were submitted during the 12-month implementation period. Most transfers were precipitated by multiple symptoms and signs, many of them nonspecific. Patient and/or family preference or insistence was noted to have played a role in 16% of the transfers. Hospital transfers were relatively equally distributed among days of the week, and 29% occurred on the night or evening shift. Approximately 1 in 5 transfers occurred within 6 days of SNF admission from a hospital, and 1 in 10 occurred within 2 days of SNF admission. After completing the RCA, SNF staff identified 1044 (23%) of the transfers as potentially preventable. Common reasons for these ratings included recognition that the condition could have been detected earlier and/or could have been managed safely in the SNF, and that earlier advance care planning and discussions with patients and families about preferences for care may have prevented some transfers. CONCLUSION: Summarizing findings from RCAs of transfers of SNF patients to acute hospitals can provide important insights into areas of focus for care process improvements and related education that may help prevent unnecessary ED visits, hospital admissions, and readmissions.
Authors: Eduard E Vasilevskis; Joseph G Ouslander; Amanda S Mixon; Susan P Bell; J Mary Lou Jacobsen; Avantika A Saraf; Daniel Markley; Kelly C Sponsler; Jill Shutes; Emily A Long; Sunil Kripalani; Sandra F Simmons; John F Schnelle Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2016-12-16 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Christine D Jones; Ethan Cumbler; Benjamin Honigman; Robert E Burke; Rebecca S Boxer; Cari Levy; Eric A Coleman; Heidi L Wald Journal: J Am Med Dir Assoc Date: 2016-11-01 Impact factor: 4.669
Authors: Anupam Chandra; Parvez A Rahman; Amelia Sneve; Rozalina G McCoy; Bjorg Thorsteinsdottir; Rajeev Chaudhry; Curtis B Storlie; Dennis H Murphree; Gregory J Hanson; Paul Y Takahashi Journal: J Am Med Dir Assoc Date: 2019-03-07 Impact factor: 4.669
Authors: Robert E Burke; Jeffrey L Schnipper; Mark V Williams; Edmondo J Robinson; Eduard E Vasilevskis; Sunil Kripalani; Joshua P Metlay; Grant S Fletcher; Andrew D Auerbach; Jacques D Donzé Journal: Med Care Date: 2017-03 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Joseph G Ouslander; Ilkin Naharci; Gabriella Engstrom; Jill Shutes; David G Wolf; Maria Rojido; Ruth Tappen; David Newman Journal: J Am Med Dir Assoc Date: 2016-06-24 Impact factor: 4.669
Authors: Lacey Loomer; Jessica A Ogarek; Susan L Mitchell; Angelo E Volandes; Roee Gutman; Pedro L Gozalo; Ellen M McCreedy; Vincent Mor Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2020-11-07 Impact factor: 5.562