Marina S McCreight1,2, Heather M Gilmartin3,4,5, Chelsea A Leonard3,4, Ashlea L Mayberry3,4, Lynette R Kelley3,4, Brandi K Lippmann3,4, Andrew S Coy3,4, Tiffany A Radcliff6, Murray J Côté6, Robert E Burke7,8. 1. Seattle-Denver Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, Denver, CO, USA. Marina.McCreight@va.gov. 2. VA Eastern Colorado Health Care System, Denver, CO, USA. Marina.McCreight@va.gov. 3. Seattle-Denver Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, Denver, CO, USA. 4. VA Eastern Colorado Health Care System, Denver, CO, USA. 5. Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA. 6. Department of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843, USA. 7. Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, Corporal Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA. 8. Hospital Medicine Section, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Transitions of care are high risk for vulnerable populations such as rural Veterans, and adequate care coordination can alleviate many risks. Single-center care coordination programs have shown promise in improving transitional care practices. However, best practices for implementing effective transitional care interventions are unknown, and a common pitfall is lack of understanding of the current process at different sites. The rural Transitions Nurse Program (TNP) is a Veterans Health Administration (VA) intervention that addresses the unique transitional care coordination needs of rural Veterans, and it is currently being implemented in five VA facilities. OBJECTIVE: We sought to employ and study process mapping as a tool for assessing site context prior to implementation of TNP, a new care coordination program. DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS: Observational qualitative study guided by the Lean Six Sigma approach. Data were collected in January-March 2017 through interviews, direct observations, and group sessions with front-line staff, including VA providers, nurses, and administrative staff from five VA Medical Centers and nine rural Patient-Aligned Care Teams. KEY RESULTS: We integrated key informant interviews, observational data, and group sessions to create ten process maps depicting the care coordination process prior to TNP implementation at each expansion site. These maps were used to adapt implementation through informing the unique role of the Transitions Nurse at each site and will be used in evaluating the program, which is essential to understanding the program's impact. CONCLUSIONS: Process mapping can be a valuable and practical approach to accurately assess site processes before implementation of care coordination programs in complex systems. The process mapping activities were useful in engaging the local staff and simultaneously guided adaptations to the TNP intervention to meet local needs. Our approach-combining multiple data sources while adapting Lean Six Sigma principles into practical use-may be generalizable to other care coordination programs.
BACKGROUND: Transitions of care are high risk for vulnerable populations such as rural Veterans, and adequate care coordination can alleviate many risks. Single-center care coordination programs have shown promise in improving transitional care practices. However, best practices for implementing effective transitional care interventions are unknown, and a common pitfall is lack of understanding of the current process at different sites. The rural Transitions Nurse Program (TNP) is a Veterans Health Administration (VA) intervention that addresses the unique transitional care coordination needs of rural Veterans, and it is currently being implemented in five VA facilities. OBJECTIVE: We sought to employ and study process mapping as a tool for assessing site context prior to implementation of TNP, a new care coordination program. DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS: Observational qualitative study guided by the Lean Six Sigma approach. Data were collected in January-March 2017 through interviews, direct observations, and group sessions with front-line staff, including VA providers, nurses, and administrative staff from five VA Medical Centers and nine rural Patient-Aligned Care Teams. KEY RESULTS: We integrated key informant interviews, observational data, and group sessions to create ten process maps depicting the care coordination process prior to TNP implementation at each expansion site. These maps were used to adapt implementation through informing the unique role of the Transitions Nurse at each site and will be used in evaluating the program, which is essential to understanding the program's impact. CONCLUSIONS: Process mapping can be a valuable and practical approach to accurately assess site processes before implementation of care coordination programs in complex systems. The process mapping activities were useful in engaging the local staff and simultaneously guided adaptations to the TNP intervention to meet local needs. Our approach-combining multiple data sources while adapting Lean Six Sigma principles into practical use-may be generalizable to other care coordination programs.
Entities:
Keywords:
Veterans; care coordination; process mapping
Authors: Robert R Cima; Michael J Brown; James R Hebl; Robin Moore; James C Rogers; Anantha Kollengode; Gwendolyn J Amstutz; Cheryl A Weisbrod; Bradly J Narr; Claude Deschamps Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2011-03-21 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Andrew D Auerbach; Sunil Kripalani; Eduard E Vasilevskis; Neil Sehgal; Peter K Lindenauer; Joshua P Metlay; Grant Fletcher; Gregory W Ruhnke; Scott A Flanders; Christopher Kim; Mark V Williams; Larissa Thomas; Vernon Giang; Shoshana J Herzig; Kanan Patel; W John Boscardin; Edmondo J Robinson; Jeffrey L Schnipper Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2016-04 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Shoshana J Herzig; Jeffrey L Schnipper; Lauren Doctoroff; Christopher S Kim; Scott A Flanders; Edmondo J Robinson; Gregory W Ruhnke; Larissa Thomas; Sunil Kripalani; Peter K Lindenauer; Mark V Williams; Joshua P Metlay; Andrew D Auerbach Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2016-06-09 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Janet E Squires; Ian D Graham; Alison M Hutchinson; Susan Michie; Jill J Francis; Anne Sales; Jamie Brehaut; Janet Curran; Noah Ivers; John Lavis; Stefanie Linklater; Shannon Fenton; Thomas Noseworthy; Jocelyn Vine; Jeremy M Grimshaw Journal: Implement Sci Date: 2015-09-28 Impact factor: 7.327
Authors: Kristina M Cordasco; Denise M Hynes; Kristin M Mattocks; Lori A Bastian; Hayden B Bosworth; David Atkins Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2019-05 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Nicole L Casanova; Amy M LeClair; Victoria Xiao; Katelyn R Mullikin; Stephenie C Lemon; Karen M Freund; Jennifer S Haas; Rachel A Freedman; Tracy A Battaglia Journal: Cancer Date: 2022-07-01 Impact factor: 6.921
Authors: Piper H Williams; Heather M Gilmartin; Chelsea Leonard; Michaela S McCarthy; Lynette Kelley; Gary K Grunwald; Christine D Jones; Melanie D Whittington Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2022-08-30 Impact factor: 6.473
Authors: J Daniel Kelly; Dawn M Bravata; Stephen Bent; Charlie M Wray; Samuel J Leonard; W John Boscardin; Laura J Myers; Salomeh Keyhani Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2021-06-01
Authors: Mary Ava Nunnery; Heather Gilmartin; Michaela McCarthy; Lexus Ujano-De Motta; Ashlea Wills; Lynette Kelley; Christine D Jones; Chelsea Leonard Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2022-01-28 Impact factor: 2.908