Literature DB >> 28679643

Endogenous Heat-Shock Protein Induction with or Without Radiofrequency Ablation or Cryoablation in Patients with Stage IV Melanoma.

Evidio Domingo-Musibay1,2, James M Heun3,4, Wendy K Nevala3, Matthew Callstrom3, Thomas Atwell3, Evanthia Galanis3, Lori A Erickson3, Svetomir N Markovic3.   

Abstract

LESSONS LEARNED: Percutaneous thermal ablation combined with in situ granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor cytokine therapy was technically feasible and well tolerated.No significant clinical or immunologic responses were seen.
BACKGROUND: Melanoma tumor-derived heat-shock proteins (HSPs) and HSP-peptide complexes can elicit protective antitumor responses. The granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) chemokine can also promote uptake and processing by professional antigen presenting cells (APCs). On this basis, we designed a pilot study of percutaneous thermal ablation as a means to induce heat-shock protein vaccination plus GM-CSF to determine safety and preliminary antitumor activity of this combination.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was designed to assess overall safety of percutaneous ablation combined with GM-CSF for unresectable, metastatic melanoma including uveal and mucosal types. All patients received heat-shock therapy (42°C for 30 minutes), then received one of three treatments: (a) intralesional GM-CSF (500 mcg standard dose); (b) radiofrequency ablation (RFA) + GM-CSF; or (c) cryoablation plus GM-CSF. The primary endpoint of the study was the induction of endogenous HSP70 and melanoma-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL).
RESULTS: Nine patients (three per study arm) were enrolled. No dose-limiting toxicity was observed as specified per protocol. All patients developed progressive disease and went on to receive alternative therapy. Median overall survival (OS) was 8.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 2-17.2). The study was not powered to detect a difference in clinical outcome among treatment groups.
CONCLUSION: Percutaneous thermal ablation plus GM-CSF was well tolerated, technically feasible, and demonstrated an acceptable adverse event profile comparable to conventional RFA and cryoablation. While HSP70 was induced following therapy, the degree of HSP70 elevation was not associated with clinical outcome or induced CTL responses. While percutaneous thermal ablation plus GM-CSF combinations including checkpoint inhibitors could be considered in future studies, the use of GM-CSF remains experimental and for use in the context of clinical trials. © AlphaMedPress; the data published online to support this summary is the property of the authors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28679643      PMCID: PMC5599201          DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2017-0060

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncologist        ISSN: 1083-7159


Discussion

Metastatic melanoma has historically carried poor prognosis [1], but new approaches using combination immunotherapy [2], molecularly targeted agents [3], and radiation therapy [4] are rapidly changing the outlook of the disease. Estimates for 2017 predict approximately 87,110 new cases of melanoma and 9,730 deaths from the disease [5]. Objective response rates (ORR) in previously untreated patients on anti‐programmed death receptor‐1 (PD‐1) therapy approach 40%; still more than half of patients fail to respond [6], [7]. For uveal melanoma patients, response rates are significantly worse, with an ORR of 3.6% and median PFS and OS of 2.6 months and 7.6 months, respectively [8]. Multimodality and multidisciplinary management of metastatic disease includes the use of percutaneous thermal ablation, a modality associated with durable local control and oncologic outcomes comparable to surgery [9]. In this study, we sought to evaluate whether in situ melanoma vaccination could be achieved by three local directed therapies combined with intralesional GM‐CSF. We show that heat‐shock therapy, RFA, and cryoablation are all associated with an increase in HSP70 levels following therapy; however, we did not detect significant induction of anti‐melanoma T‐cell responses, a pre‐specified endpoint of the study. Therapeutic strategies that help generate an immunostimulatory tumor microenvironment may help inform clinical approaches to treat patients with refractory disease. Response to current checkpoint inhibitor strategies depends on antitumor T cells expressing PD‐1 and correlates with programmed death‐ligand 1 (PD‐L1) expression on tumor cells. Here we have shown that thermal ablation therapy for melanoma induces expression of HSP70, a melanoma tumor‐associated antigen and alarmin molecule with immunological adjuvant activity. Several studies have shown that heat‐shock protein complexes containing tumor‐derived proteins are released and can be processed by antigen presenting cells [10], [11]. In this study, cryoablation was associated with the most significant plasma HSP70 elevations, although it is not clear that this is necessary or sufficient for effective in situ vaccination. However, local expression of GM‐CSF by the modified oncolytic herpes simplex virus talimogene laherparepvec has shown promise [12]. The cellular immunologic responses to viruses, as well as differences in local tumor dose of GM‐CSF expressed by oncolytic viruses, may in part explain some of the difference in observed outcomes between the two approaches. Further refinement of this in situ vaccination therapy strategy is still required prior to further development of the approach. Testing of lower doses of GM‐CSF in combination with checkpoint inhibition may prove more fruitful, particularly in patients with uveal melanoma, for whom responses to checkpoint inhibitors are low and the presence of liver‐predominant metastatic disease can be successfully targeted for percutaneous ablation therapy.

Trial Information

Melanoma Metastatic/Advanced No designated number of regimens Phase I Null Tolerability Correlative endpoint Deliverability Toxicity Efficacy Correlative endpoints: Plasma HSP70 levels and doubling of anti‐melanoma CTLs Drug tolerable, efficacy indeterminant

Drug Information for Phase I Thermal Ablation

Sargramostim/GM‐CSF Leukine Sanofi Cytokine Immune therapy 500 Micrograms (mcg) per flat dose Intra‐tumoral Once

Patient Characteristics for Phase I Thermal Ablation

3 6 IV Median (range): 63 (45–81) Median (range): 2 (0–4) 0 — 9 1 — 2 — 3 — unknown — Mucosal melanoma: 3 Ocular melanoma: 3 Cutaneous melanoma: 2 Acral‐lentiginous melanoma: 1

Primary Assessment Method for Phase I Thermal Ablation

13 11 9 9 n = 9 (100%) 8.2 months, CI: 2–17.2 Months

Phase I Thermal Ablation Adverse Events

Abbreviation: NC/NA, no change from baseline/no adverse event.

Assessment, Analysis, and Discussion

Study completed Drug tolerable, efficacy indeterminant Heat‐shock proteins (HSPs), also known as molecular chaperones, form an intracellular network of molecular machinery that maintain the proteome. Mammalian HSPs are classified according to molecular weight into families: HSP110, HSP90, HSP70, HSP60, HSP40, and small HSPs (HSP27 and others). Humans encode at least 13 members of the HSP70 family that use the chemical energy provided by ATP hydrolysis to orchestrate cotranslational folding of nascent polypeptide chains [13], [14]. HSP70 family members can bind apoptotic protease activation factor 1 (APAF‐1) and Bax proteins in the cytoplasm and inhibit apoptosome formation and proapoptotic activity, respectively [15]. Client proteins for the HSP70 chaperone include mutated BRAF as well as activated phosphorylated focal adhesion kinase (p‐FAK, Y397), associated with melanoma invasiveness and metastasis [16]. Extracellular HSP70 peptide complexes released from tumor cells can also activate anti‐melanoma T cells in vitro [11] and, in vivo, are bound by and internalized via scavenger receptors, such as CD91 and LOX‐1, on the surface of antigen presenting cells [17], [18], [19], [20]. In this way, antigen presenting cells (APCs) such as dendritic cells receive tumor antigens that can be processed and presented on major histocompatibility complex class I and class II molecules to CD8 positive and CD4 positive T cells. This process has been termed HSP vaccination, and there is long‐standing interest in the use of HSP peptide complexes in tumor vaccination strategies [21]. In the present study, we combined percutaneous ablation therapy and intralesional granulocyte‐macrophage colony‐stimulating factor (GM‐CSF) to couple the DC‐stimulatory activity of GM‐CSF with the antigenic stimulation of the ablation procedure. We show that the combination was well tolerated and that ablation therapy increases plasma HSP70 levels, demonstrating effective antigen mobilization by the procedure. We also demonstrate feasibility of using intralesional cytokine therapy for in situ vaccination following ablation therapy. Studies combining HSP70 vaccination with interleukin 2 (IL‐2), or IL‐7/IL‐12/IL‐15 show improved T cell cytotoxic and proliferative capacity [22], and use of intralesional cytokine combinations as well as other investigational agents (i.e., CpG oligodeoxynucleotides, TLR‐agonists) may increase the potency of the approach [23]. Several study limitations are inherent to the small pilot nature of the study. Although a flat 500 mcg dose of GM‐CSF was chosen for purposes of this feasibility study, there is a need to define the optimal dose of GM‐CSF for HSP vaccination. Furthermore, design of this trial did not permit an assessment of the tumor microenvironment, and future studies would benefit from analysis of therapy‐induced changes in the expression of HSPs and checkpoint ligands in biopsy specimens. The chaperone‐based vaccination approach we employed was well tolerated, but it was insufficient to produce clinically relevant immunologic activation. Further rational development of HSP vaccination using percutaneous thermal ablation appears likely to require checkpoint inhibition, which has already shown evidence of synergy in murine metastatic melanoma models [24]. Heat‐shock proteins play an important role in melanoma tumorigenesis and HSP peptide vaccines have shown promising immunostimulatory activity in pre‐clinical and human clinical trials [25]. Future studies exploring combinations with immune checkpoint inhibitors with/without GM‐CSF are warranted and will likely translate into improved outcomes for patients managed with percutaneous ablation therapy for metastatic melanoma. Plasma HSP70 levels. Baseline circulating HSP70 was detectable in all patients. (A): Individual patient levels of plasma HSP70 over 24 hours shown for heat shock therapy (HST), RFA, and cryoablation cohorts. (B): HSP70 fold‐change above baseline level measurements for patients receiving cryoablation (top, arm C), RFA (middle, arm B), and HST (lower, arm A), with sustained elevations of HSP70 seen in patients receiving cryoablation therapy. Abbreviations: HSP70, 70 kilodalton heat‐shock protein; RFA, radiofrequency ablation. Major histocompatibility complex‐tetramer testing identified cluster of differentiation 8 positive (CD8+) cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) for each tumor antigen. Pre‐specified criteria for positive tetramer results was >0.02% tetramer positive CD8+ CTLs if baseline negative, or >2‐fold increase in the baseline detectable number. We detected low baseline levels of peripheral CD8+ CTLs against known melanoma antigens MART‐1, GP100, and Tyrosinase (7 of 8 evaluable patients). There was no significant induction of CD8+ CTL responses to melanoma antigens following treatment. Abbreviations: GP100, glycoprotein 100; MART‐1, melanoma antigen recognized by T cells 1.

Abbreviation: NC/NA, no change from baseline/no adverse event.

  25 in total

1.  Human heat shock protein 70 peptide complexes specifically activate antimelanoma T cells.

Authors:  C Castelli; A M Ciupitu; F Rini; L Rivoltini; A Mazzocchi; R Kiessling; G Parmiani
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2001-01-01       Impact factor: 12.701

2.  HSP70 vaccine in combination with gene therapy with plasmid DNA encoding sPD-1 overcomes immune resistance and suppresses the progression of pulmonary metastatic melanoma.

Authors:  Hui Geng; Gui-Mei Zhang; Han Xiao; Ye Yuan; Dong Li; Hui Zhang; Hui Qiu; Yu-Fei He; Zuo-Hua Feng
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2006-06-01       Impact factor: 7.396

3.  Guidelines for the nomenclature of the human heat shock proteins.

Authors:  Harm H Kampinga; Jurre Hageman; Michel J Vos; Hiroshi Kubota; Robert M Tanguay; Elspeth A Bruford; Michael E Cheetham; Bin Chen; Lawrence E Hightower
Journal:  Cell Stress Chaperones       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 3.667

4.  In Situ Tumor Vaccination by Combining Local Radiation and Tumor-Specific Antibody or Immunocytokine Treatments.

Authors:  Zachary S Morris; Emily I Guy; David M Francis; Monica M Gressett; Lauryn R Werner; Lakeesha L Carmichael; Richard K Yang; Eric A Armstrong; Shyhmin Huang; Fariba Navid; Stephen D Gillies; Alan Korman; Jacquelyn A Hank; Alexander L Rakhmilevich; Paul M Harari; Paul M Sondel
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 12.701

5.  Association of Pembrolizumab With Tumor Response and Survival Among Patients With Advanced Melanoma.

Authors:  Antoni Ribas; Omid Hamid; Adil Daud; F Stephen Hodi; Jedd D Wolchok; Richard Kefford; Anthony M Joshua; Amita Patnaik; Wen-Jen Hwu; Jeffrey S Weber; Tara C Gangadhar; Peter Hersey; Roxana Dronca; Richard W Joseph; Hassane Zarour; Bartosz Chmielowski; Donald P Lawrence; Alain Algazi; Naiyer A Rizvi; Brianna Hoffner; Christine Mateus; Kevin Gergich; Jill A Lindia; Maxine Giannotti; Xiaoyun Nicole Li; Scot Ebbinghaus; S Peter Kang; Caroline Robert
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 6.  PD-L1 (B7-H1) and PD-1 pathway blockade for cancer therapy: Mechanisms, response biomarkers, and combinations.

Authors:  Weiping Zou; Jedd D Wolchok; Lieping Chen
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 17.956

7.  Involvement of LOX-1 in dendritic cell-mediated antigen cross-presentation.

Authors:  Yves Delneste; Giovanni Magistrelli; Jean Gauchat; Jean Haeuw; Jean Aubry; Kayo Nakamura; Naoko Kawakami-Honda; Liliane Goetsch; Tatsuya Sawamura; Jean Bonnefoy; Pascale Jeannin
Journal:  Immunity       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 31.745

8.  Heat shock protein 70 (HSP70) induces cytotoxicity of T-helper cells.

Authors:  Constança Figueiredo; Miriam Wittmann; Dong Wang; Ralf Dressel; Axel Seltsam; Rainer Blasczyk; Britta Eiz-Vesper
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2008-11-18       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 9.  The HSP70 family and cancer.

Authors:  Maureen E Murphy
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2013-04-04       Impact factor: 4.944

Review 10.  Melanoma: the intersection of molecular targeted therapy and immune checkpoint inhibition.

Authors:  Peter Kar Han Lau; Paolo A Ascierto; Grant McArthur
Journal:  Curr Opin Immunol       Date:  2016-01-05       Impact factor: 7.486

View more
  4 in total

1.  A Non-interventional Clinical Trial Assessing Immune Responses After Radiofrequency Ablation of Liver Metastases From Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Markus W Löffler; Bianca Nussbaum; Günter Jäger; Philipp S Jurmeister; Jan Budczies; Philippe L Pereira; Stephan Clasen; Daniel J Kowalewski; Lena Mühlenbruch; Ingmar Königsrainer; Stefan Beckert; Ruth Ladurner; Silvia Wagner; Florian Bullinger; Thorben H Gross; Christopher Schroeder; Bence Sipos; Alfred Königsrainer; Stefan Stevanović; Carsten Denkert; Hans-Georg Rammensee; Cécile Gouttefangeas; Sebastian P Haen
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2019-11-19       Impact factor: 7.561

Review 2.  Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Cancer Therapy-How to Overcome Drug Resistance?

Authors:  Yefang Lao; Daoming Shen; Weili Zhang; Rui He; Min Jiang
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 6.575

3.  Interventional oncology update.

Authors:  Alex Newbury; Chantal Ferguson; Daniel Alvarez Valero; Roberto Kutcher-Diaz; Lacey McIntosh; Ara Karamanian; Aaron Harman
Journal:  Eur J Radiol Open       Date:  2022-06-20

Review 4.  Thermal ablation in non-small cell lung cancer: a review of treatment modalities and the evidence for combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Authors:  Kanishka Rangamuwa; Tracy Leong; Clare Weeden; Marie-Liesse Asselin-Labat; Steven Bozinovski; Michael Christie; Tom John; Phillip Antippa; Louis Irving; Daniel Steinfort
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2021-06
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.