Literature DB >> 28679544

Risk Prediction Modeling on Family-Based Sequencing Data Using a Random Field Method.

Yalu Wen1,2, Alexandra Burt3, Qing Lu4.   

Abstract

Family-based design is one of the most popular designs in genetic studies and has many unique features for risk-prediction research. It is robust against genetic heterogeneity, and the relatedness among family members can be informative for predicting an individual's risk for disease with polygenic and shared environmental components of risk. Despite these strengths, family-based designs have been used infrequently in current risk-prediction studies, and their related statistical methods have not been well developed. In this article, we developed a generalized random field (GRF) method for family-based risk-prediction modeling on sequencing data. In GRF, subjects' phenotypes are viewed as stochastic realizations of a random field in a space, and a subject's phenotype is predicted by adjacent subjects, where adjacencies between subjects are determined by their genetic and within-family similarities. Different from existing methods that adjust for familial correlations, the GRF uses this information to form surrogates to further improve prediction accuracy. It also uses within-family information to capture predictors (e.g., rare mutations) that are homogeneous in families. Through simulations, we have demonstrated that the GRF method attained better performance than an existing method by considering additional information from family members and accounting for genetic heterogeneity. We further provided practical recommendations for designing family-based risk prediction studies. Finally, we illustrated the GRF method with an application to a whole-genome exome data set from the Michigan State University Twin Registry study.
Copyright © 2017 by the Genetics Society of America.

Keywords:  family-based studies; genetic heterogeneity; high-dimensional data; random field theory

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28679544      PMCID: PMC5586386          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.117.199752

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  37 in total

1.  A vision for the future of genomics research.

Authors:  Francis S Collins; Eric D Green; Alan E Guttmacher; Mark S Guyer
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-04-14       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  The future of association studies: gene-based analysis and replication.

Authors:  Benjamin M Neale; Pak C Sham
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2004-07-22       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 3.  Challenges of translating genetic tests into clinical and public health practice.

Authors:  Wolf H Rogowski; Scott D Grosse; Muin J Khoury
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 53.242

4.  Efficient methods to compute genomic predictions.

Authors:  P M VanRaden
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.034

5.  A Clustered Multiclass Likelihood-Ratio Ensemble Method for Family-Based Association Analysis Accounting for Phenotypic Heterogeneity.

Authors:  Yalu Wen; Qing Lu
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2016-06-19       Impact factor: 2.135

6.  Common SNPs explain a large proportion of the heritability for human height.

Authors:  Jian Yang; Beben Benyamin; Brian P McEvoy; Scott Gordon; Anjali K Henders; Dale R Nyholt; Pamela A Madden; Andrew C Heath; Nicholas G Martin; Grant W Montgomery; Michael E Goddard; Peter M Visscher
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2010-06-20       Impact factor: 38.330

7.  Rare variant in scavenger receptor BI raises HDL cholesterol and increases risk of coronary heart disease.

Authors:  Paolo Zanoni; Sumeet A Khetarpal; Daniel B Larach; William F Hancock-Cerutti; John S Millar; Marina Cuchel; Stephanie DerOhannessian; Anatol Kontush; Praveen Surendran; Danish Saleheen; Stella Trompet; J Wouter Jukema; Anton De Craen; Panos Deloukas; Naveed Sattar; Ian Ford; Chris Packard; Abdullah al Shafi Majumder; Dewan S Alam; Emanuele Di Angelantonio; Goncalo Abecasis; Rajiv Chowdhury; Jeanette Erdmann; Børge G Nordestgaard; Sune F Nielsen; Anne Tybjærg-Hansen; Ruth Frikke Schmidt; Kari Kuulasmaa; Dajiang J Liu; Markus Perola; Stefan Blankenberg; Veikko Salomaa; Satu Männistö; Philippe Amouyel; Dominique Arveiler; Jean Ferrieres; Martina Müller-Nurasyid; Marco Ferrario; Frank Kee; Cristen J Willer; Nilesh Samani; Heribert Schunkert; Adam S Butterworth; Joanna M M Howson; Gina M Peloso; Nathan O Stitziel; John Danesh; Sekar Kathiresan; Daniel J Rader
Journal:  Science       Date:  2016-03-11       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Risk Prediction Modeling of Sequencing Data Using a Forward Random Field Method.

Authors:  Yalu Wen; Zihuai He; Ming Li; Qing Lu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-02-19       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Prediction of complex human traits using the genomic best linear unbiased predictor.

Authors:  Gustavo de Los Campos; Ana I Vazquez; Rohan Fernando; Yann C Klimentidis; Daniel Sorensen
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2013-07-11       Impact factor: 5.917

10.  A powerful approach to sub-phenotype analysis in population-based genetic association studies.

Authors:  Andrew P Morris; Cecilia M Lindgren; Eleftheria Zeggini; Nicholas J Timpson; Timothy M Frayling; Andrew T Hattersley; Mark I McCarthy
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.135

View more
  1 in total

1.  An ensemble-based likelihood ratio approach for family-based genomic risk prediction.

Authors:  Hui An; Chang-Shuai Wei; Oliver Wang; Da-Hui Wang; Liang-Wen Xu; Qing Lu; Cheng-Yin Ye
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2018 Dec.       Impact factor: 3.066

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.