| Literature DB >> 28676556 |
John S Mikhaeil1,2, Sandra M Sacco1,3, Caitlin Saint1,2, William Gittings1,3, Jordan Bunda1,3, Cameron R Giles1,2, Val A Fajardo1,2, Rene Vandenboom1,3, Wendy E Ward1,2,3, Paul J LeBlanc4,2.
Abstract
Microcomputed tomography (μCT) is an imaging technology to assess bone microarchitecture, a determinant of bone strength. When measured in vivo, μCT exposes the skeletal site of interest to a dose of radiation, in addition to nearby skeletal muscles as well. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine the effects of repeated radiation exposure from in vivo μCT on muscle health - specifically, muscle morphometrics, contractile function, and enzyme activity. This study exposed the right hind limb of female mice to either a low (26 cGy) or moderate (46 cGy) dose, at 2, 4, and 6 months of age, while the left hind limb of the same animal was exposed to a single dose at 6 months to serve as a nonirradiated control. Muscle weight, cross-sectional area, isometric contractile function, and representative maximal enzyme activities of amino acid, fatty acid, glucose, and oxidative metabolism in extensor digitorum longus (EDL) and soleus were assessed. Low-dose radiation had no effect. In contrast, moderate-dose radiation resulted in a 5% increase in time-to-peak tension and 16% increase in half-relaxation time of isometric twitches in EDL, although these changes were not seen when normalized to force. Moderate-dose radiation also resulted in an ~33% decrease in citrate synthase activity in soleus but not EDL, with no changes to the other enzymes measured. Thus, three low doses of radiation over 6 months had no effect on contractile function or metabolic enzyme activity in soleus and EDL of female mice. In contrast, three moderate doses of radiation over 6 months induced some effects on metabolic enzyme activity in soleus but not EDL Future studies that wish to investigate muscle tissue that is adjacent to scanned bone should take radiation exposure dose into consideration.Entities:
Keywords: Citrate synthase; X‐ray; extensor digitorum longus; soleus
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28676556 PMCID: PMC5506525 DOI: 10.14814/phy2.13338
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Physiol Rep ISSN: 2051-817X
Anthropometric characterization of mice extensor digitorum longus and soleus muscles with and without exposure to radiation doses by microcomputed tomography scanning
| EDL | SOL | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CON | RAD | CON | RAD | |
| Low dose (26 cGy) | ||||
| Mass (mg) | 13 ± 0.2 | 14 ± 0.2 | 12 ± 0.2 | 12 ± 0.2 |
| Length (mm) | 13 ± 0.2 | 13 ± 0.0 | 12 ± 0.2 | 12 ± 0.1 |
| CSA (mm2) | 2.2 ± 0.1 | 2.3 ± 0.1 | 1.3 ± 0.1 | 1.4 ± 0.1 |
| Moderate dose (46 cGy) | ||||
| Mass (mg) | 12 ± 0.4 | 13 ± 0.5 | 12 ± 0.6 | 12 ± 0.4 |
| Length (mm) | 14 ± 0.2 | 14 ± 0.3 | 13 ± 0.2 | 13 ± 0.1 |
| CSA (mm2) | 1.9 ± 0.1 | 2.0 ± 0.1 | 1.2 ± 0.1 | 1.2 ± 0.1 |
Values are mean ± SEM. n = 6 for low dose and n = 9 for moderate dose. CON, no radiation exposure; RAD, radiation exposure; SOL, soleus; EDL, extensor digitorum longus; CSA, cross‐sectional area.
Figure 1Representative peak twitch force trace normalized to maximal peak twitch of mice extensor digitorum longus and soleus muscles with and without exposure to the low (26 cGy) radiation by microcomputed tomography scanning. EDL, extensor digitorum longus; SOL, soleus; CON, no radiation exposure; RAD, radiation exposure.
Figure 2Representative peak twitch force trace normalized to maximal peak twitch of mice extensor digitorum longus and soleus muscles with and without exposure to moderate (46 cGy) radiation by microcomputed tomography scanning. EDL, extensor digitorum longus; SOL, soleus; CON, no radiation exposure; RAD, radiation exposure.
Isometric muscle function of mice extensor digitorum longus and soleus muscles with and without exposure to low (26 cGy) radiation by microcomputed tomography scanning
| EDL | SOL | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CON | RAD | CON | RAD | |
|
| 52 ± 6 | 70 ± 7 | 25 ± 2 | 24 ± 1 |
|
| 350 ± 31 | 406 ± 18 | 229 ± 22 | 228 ± 11 |
|
| 23 ± 2 | 31 ± 3 | 19 ± 2 | 18 ± 1 |
|
| 156 ± 13 | 181 ± 8 | 172 ± 15 | 168 ± 10 |
|
| 0.15 ± 0.01 | 0.17 ± 0.01 | 0.11 ± 0.01 | 0.11 ± 0.01 |
| TPT(msec) | 17 ± 0.3 | 17 ± 0.3 | 43.0 ± 1.5 | 40.0 ± 1.5 |
| 1/2 RT(msec) | 17 ± 0.5 | 17 ± 0.8 | 42.3 ± 2.3 | 40.8 ± 3.1 |
| TPT/ | 0.4 ± 0.1 | 0.3 ± 0.0 | 1.8 ± 0.2 | 1.4 ± 0.3 |
| 1/2 RT/ | 0.4 ± 0.1 | 0.3 ± 0.0 | 1.8 ± 0.2 | 1.4 ± 0.3 |
| +d | 3.2 ± 0.4 | 4.3 ± 0.4 | 1.1 ± 0.1 | 1.0 ± 0.1 |
| −d | 1.9 ± 0.2 | 2.7 ± 0.3 | 0.4 ± 0.0 | 0.4 ± 0.0 |
Values are mean ± SEM. n = 6. EDL, extensor digitorum longus; SOL, soleus; CON, no radiation exposure; RAD, radiation exposure; P t, peak twitch force; P o, peak tetanic force; CSA, cross‐sectional area; P t:P o, twitch to tetanus ratio; TPT, time‐to‐peak tension; 1/2 RT, half‐relaxation time; +dP/dt, rate of force development; −dP/dt, rate of force relaxation.
Isometric muscle function of mice extensor digitorum longus and soleus muscles with and without exposure to moderate (46 cGy) radiation by microcomputed tomography scanning
| EDL | SOL | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CON | RAD | CON | RAD | |
|
| 74 ± 4 | 77 ± 6 | 33 ± 2 | 30 ± 2 |
|
| 388 ± 23 | 394 ± 16 | 228 ± 18 | 213 ± 15 |
|
| 39 ± 1 | 40 ± 2 | 28 ± 3 | 26 ± 1 |
|
| 202 ± 8 | 206 ± 5 | 189 ± 15 | 188 ± 15 |
|
| 0.19 ± 0.01 | 0.19 ± 0.01 | 0.15 ± 0.01 | 0.15 ± 0.01 |
| TPT (msec) | 18 ± 0.3 | 19 ± 0.3 | 42 ± 2 | 45 ± 2 |
| 1/2 RT (msec) | 24 ± 1 | 28 ± 1 | 52 ± 4 | 54 ± 3 |
| TPT/ | 0.3 ± 0.0 | 0.3 ± 0.0 | 1.3 ± 0.1 | 1.6 ± 0.1 |
| 1/2 RT/Pt (msec/mN) | 0.3 ± 0.0 | 0.4 ± 0.0 | 1.6 ± 0.2 | 1.9 ± 0.2 |
| +d | 6.4 ± 0.4 | 6.6 ± 0.5 | 1.7 ± 0.1 | 1.6 ± 0.1 |
| −d | 2.4 ± 0.2 | 2.4 ± 0.2 | 0.5 ± 0.0 | 0.4 ± 0.0 |
Values are mean ± SEM. n = 9. EDL, extensor digitorum longus; SOL, soleus; CON, no radiation exposure; RAD, radiation exposure; P t, peak twitch force; P o, peak tetanic force; CSA, cross‐sectional area; P t:P o, twitch to tetanus ratio; TPT, time‐to‐peak tension; 1/2 RT, half‐relaxation time; +dP/dt, rate of force development; −dP/dt, rate of force relaxation.
Significantly different from CON.
Figure 3Fold change enzyme activity between radiated and nonradiated mice (A) extensor digitorum longus (EDL) and (B) soleus muscles exposed to low (26 cGy) radiation by microcomputed tomography scanning. Values are mean ± SEM. n = 5–6. CON, no radiation exposure; RAD, radiation exposure; AAT, alanine aminotransferase; BHAD, 3‐hydroxyacyl‐CoA dehydrogenase; CPT, carnitine palmitoyltransferase; HK, hexokinase; CS, citrate synthase; COX, cytochrome c oxidase.
Figure 4Fold change enzyme activity between radiated and nonradiated mice (A) extensor digitorum longus (EDL) and (B) soleus muscles exposed to moderate (46 cGy) radiation by microcomputed tomography scanning. Values are mean ± SEM. n = 5–6. *Significantly different from CON. CON, no radiation exposure; RAD, radiation exposure; AAT, alanine aminotransferase; BHAD, 3‐hydroxyacyl‐CoA dehydrogenase; CPT, carnitine palmitoyltransferase; HK, hexokinase; CS, citrate synthase; COX, cytochrome c oxidase.