Xin Liu1,2, Suchi Chang3, Cuiping Fu2, Zhirong Huo4, Jing Zhou5, Chengying Liu6, Shanqun Li7, Aijun Sun8. 1. Department of Respiratory Medicine, Fujian Province Geriatric Hospital, Fuzhou, China. 2. Department of Respiratory Medicine, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China. 3. Department of Respiratory Medicine, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China Shanghai Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China. 4. Department of Respiratory Medicine, Dongguan Third People's Hospital, Guangdong, China. 5. Department of Respiratory Medicine, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China Department of General Practice Medicine, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China. 6. Department of Respiratory Medicine, Affiliated Jiangyin Hospital of Southeast University, Jiangyin, China. 7. Department of Respiratory Medicine, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 180 Fenglin Road, Shanghai 200032, China. 8. Shanghai Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, Zhongshan Hospital, and Institutes of Biomedical Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: To explore the differences in short and middle term adverse factors of pulmonary embolism (PE) outcome. METHODS: This was a single-center retrospective study of inpatients admitted from Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, with first-time PE. Clinical data were collected from patients with objectively confirmed PE, and a 2-year follow up was conducted. RESULTS: The sample contained 310 patients with PE, ranging in age from 18 to 86 years old (mean 63.28 ± 15.30) and including 165 men (53.2%) and 145 women (46.8%). Successful treatment was achieved in 285 cases (91.9%) and unsuccessful treatment turned out in 25 cases (8.1%). Logistical regression analysis showed that massive PE [odds ratio (OR) = 23.625, 95% confidence interval (CI) 6.248-89.333], hypoxemia (OR = 11.915, 95% CI 1.900-74.727), leukocytosis (OR = 9.120, 95% CI 2.227-37.349) and active cancer (OR = 6.142, 95% CI 1.233-30.587) were associated with a poor prognosis for acute PE in the short term (in hospital). Seventy-seven PE cases with complete electronic records were finally included in the follow up. Cox regression analysis showed that elevated pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP, ⩾50 mmHg) (HR = 9.240, 95% CI, 2.307-37.013) and active cancer with PE (HR = 3.700, 95% CI, 1.010-13.562) were associated with an increased risk of mid-term mortality after a follow-up period of 2 years. CONCLUSIONS: Massive PE, hypoxemia, leukocytosis and active cancer may contribute to a poor prognosis for patients with acute PE in hospital. Elevated PASP and active cancer may negatively impact survival time and increase the risk of death for patients with acute PE after 2-year follow up. Short-term adverse factors of acute PE are not exactly the same as the mid-term risk factors of acute PE.
BACKGROUND: To explore the differences in short and middle term adverse factors of pulmonary embolism (PE) outcome. METHODS: This was a single-center retrospective study of inpatients admitted from Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, with first-time PE. Clinical data were collected from patients with objectively confirmed PE, and a 2-year follow up was conducted. RESULTS: The sample contained 310 patients with PE, ranging in age from 18 to 86 years old (mean 63.28 ± 15.30) and including 165 men (53.2%) and 145 women (46.8%). Successful treatment was achieved in 285 cases (91.9%) and unsuccessful treatment turned out in 25 cases (8.1%). Logistical regression analysis showed that massive PE [odds ratio (OR) = 23.625, 95% confidence interval (CI) 6.248-89.333], hypoxemia (OR = 11.915, 95% CI 1.900-74.727), leukocytosis (OR = 9.120, 95% CI 2.227-37.349) and active cancer (OR = 6.142, 95% CI 1.233-30.587) were associated with a poor prognosis for acute PE in the short term (in hospital). Seventy-seven PE cases with complete electronic records were finally included in the follow up. Cox regression analysis showed that elevated pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP, ⩾50 mmHg) (HR = 9.240, 95% CI, 2.307-37.013) and active cancer with PE (HR = 3.700, 95% CI, 1.010-13.562) were associated with an increased risk of mid-term mortality after a follow-up period of 2 years. CONCLUSIONS: Massive PE, hypoxemia, leukocytosis and active cancer may contribute to a poor prognosis for patients with acute PE in hospital. Elevated PASP and active cancer may negatively impact survival time and increase the risk of death for patients with acute PE after 2-year follow up. Short-term adverse factors of acute PE are not exactly the same as the mid-term risk factors of acute PE.
Pulmonary embolism (PE) is the most serious manifestation of venous embolism and is a
potentially life-threatening condition. Prompt diagnosis, risk stratification and
treatment can improve the outcome. Numerous data revealed that short- and long-term
predictors of PE outcome were not identical. Jo and colleagues reported that
leukocytosis was significantly correlated with the mortality of PE and thus was an
important predictive factor in determining the short-term outcome of PE.[1] Gong and colleagues reported that idiopathic PE, Right Ventricular
Dysfunction (RVD), D-dimer positivity, anticoagulation treatment less than 3 months,
cardiac Troponin I (cTnI) positivity and post-treatment pulmonary artery systolic
pressure (PASP) greater than 40 mmHg were adverse factors that would affect the
long-term prognosis of PE.[2] We hypothesized that mid-term predictors of PE would differ from short-term
predictors. To explore the short-term predictors and the survival of patients, we
investigated the data of inpatients with acute PE.
Methods
Study design
This was a retrospective study of a large series of patients with PE and was
conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. The Ethics Committee
of Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, approved the study protocol (permit
number: 27-2956), which waived any need for patient informed consent.
Study population
The study population was composed of inpatients with first-time PE from Zhongshan
Hospital, Fudan University (Shanghai, China) from January 2008 to July 2014.
Inclusion criteria
There were four primary qualifications used for inclusion criteria in this study.
First, patients had to meet the 2001 criteria for PE as adopted by the Chinese
Thoracic Society.[3] Definite PE was confirmed by computed tomography pulmonary angiography
(CTPA) or lung ventilation perfusion scanning. Second, based on the Management
of Massive and Submassive Pulmonary Embolism, Iliofemoral Deep Vein Thrombosis,
and Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension (version 2011), patients with
massive PE received thrombolytic therapy while those with submassive PE received
either thrombolytic or anticoagulant therapy as indicated by the clinical
circumstances and wishes of the patients.[4] Patients with low-risk PE received anticoagulant therapy. Third,
catheter-based interventions and surgical embolectomies were performed for
patients with massive PE who could not receive thrombolytic therapy or who
remained unstable after receiving thrombolytic therapy, submassive PE that was
judged to have an adverse prognosis. Inferior vena cava filters were used in
patients with acute PE, complicating deep vein thrombosis (DVT) with
contraindications to anticoagulation. Fourth, patients discharged from the
hospital to continue secondary prophylaxis with the vitamin K antagonist
warfarin for at least 3 months were included in the follow up.
Exclusion criteria
Patients who had a clinical diagnosis with an indeterminate result or who were
without objective confirmatory testing were excluded from the study, as were
patients with cases of re-embolism.
Definition of clinical outcomes
Definitions for PE subgroups were coded with reference to the management of PE
from the American Heart Association (version 2011).[4] Elevated PASP was defined as exceeding 50 mmHg according to tricuspid
regurgitation jet velocity by echocardiography.[5]Active cancer referred to cancer diagnosed no more than 6 months prior to the
onset of PE, metastatic cancer or any malignancies requiring curative or
palliative treatment within the previous 6 months.[6]PE cases were divided into a valid and an invalid group in light of a curative
effect. For patients in the valid group, the symptoms of dyspnea either abated
or disappeared, the number of filling defected segments was reduced or the
embolus disappeared. For patients in the invalid group, dyspnea worsened, there
was no change in embolus by CTPA, an adverse event occurred (such as
cardiopulmonary resuscitation or major bleeding) or death occurred.
Data collection
All clinical data and laboratory results were abstracted retrospectively from
medical electronic records. Two trained investigators (Xin LIU, Cuiping FU)
identified inpatients on the basis of the discharge diagnostic codes for PE
found in the International Classification of Disease (ICD-9 and ICD-10).
Adjudication differences were resolved by a consensus procedure. The data from
the first 24 h after admission were extracted, which included relevant clinical
symptoms and signs, predisposing risk factors, arterial blood gas values,
D-dimer, electrocardiograms, and the Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index (PESI).
In addition, the following information was recorded in the medical records:
previous DVT, trauma, surgery, spinal cord injury, central venous lines,
immobility (specified as paralytic stroke, bed rest >3 days, or >8 h
travel) within the last 3 months, active cancer, pregnancy or puerperium at the
time of the event, oral contraceptives used at the time of the event or up to 1
month prior to the event, hormone replacement therapy, complications from
malignancies, and chronic heart or respiratory failure.PE cases with complete electronic records were finally included in the follow up.
There existed retinue clinical care but no additional clinical intervention or
any trial protocol. We observed the outcome of these patients through physician
reporting in the hospital or telephone consultation. Objective data were
obtained during hospital readmission or clinic visits. Death certificates of
patients who died during the follow-up period were also reviewed. The end event
was the all-cause mortality. Mortality data were obtained through hospital
record reviews or review of death certificates. Survival time was calculated
from the date of confirmed PE to the day of death or the end of follow up.
Participants were followed for a maximum of 24 months. The estimated number of
endpoint events was at least 22 based on a statistical model presented by Schoenfeld.[7] The follow-up period ended in July 2014.
Statistical analysis
We used SPSS version 20.0 (IBM Corporation, USA) for all data analyses. The mean
and standard deviation (SD) were used as measures of statistical dispersion and
were applied to normality plots with tests. Measurement data were presented as
the mean ± SD and range. An independent samples t test was used
to compare measurement data between the two groups. We expressed enumeration
data in percentages and used the χ2 test to examine differences in
the enumeration data between groups. Multivariable logistic regression models,
with odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), were used to examine
the relationship between risk factors and curative effects (in hospital). Cox
proportional hazards regression models were used to analyze the prognostic
factors affecting patient survival. Those results were expressed as hazard
ratios along with the corresponding 95% CIs. The impact of loss to follow up was
estimated by performing sensitivity analysis. All p values were
two tailed, and statistical significance was set as a p value
less than 0.05.
Results
After excluding unavailable data, a total of 310 PE cases were identified from the
electronic medical record database. As indicated on the P-P plots, the sample
distribution approximated the normal distribution.The sample contained 310 patients (165 men, 145 women), ranging in age from 18 to 86
years old (mean ± SD, 63.28 ± 15.30 years). The mean hospital stay was 6.7 ± 4.2
days. Based on the curative effect, patients with PE were divided into a valid group
(n = 285) and an invalid group (n = 25). The
occurrence frequency and the curative effect of inpatients with PE in different age
groups is illustrated in Figure
1.
Figure 1.
The occurrence frequency and the curative effect of inpatients with acute
pulmonary embolism (PE) in different age groups.
The occurrence frequency and the curative effect of inpatients with acute
pulmonary embolism (PE) in different age groups.
Patient-related and setting-related predisposing factors
Immobility due to sitting, major trauma or major general surgery reached up to
17.4% (54 of 310). In addition, 37 cases of previous DVT and 35 cases of active
cancer were observed. Out of the 35 cases, 11 were lung cancers. All the
pathological results showed that tumor cells were non-small cells. Of these,
eight cases involved adenocarcinoma and three cases were not further
specified.
Clinical symptoms and signs
Breathing difficulty was the most common clinical symptom, accounting for 89 out
of 310 cases (28.7%), followed by 74 cases of chest pain (23.9%), 51 cases of
asymmetry edema of lower limbs (16.5%), 45 cases of syncope (14.5%), and 39
cases of hemoptysis (12.6%). The classic triad of chest pain, dyspnea, and
hemoptysis occurred infrequently in our sample, accounting for only seven out of
310 cases (2.3%).
Auxiliary examinations
Arterial blood gas analysis was conducted in each of the 310 cases. Of these,
there were 123 cases of Partial pressure of oxygen in artery (PaO2)
less than 60 mmHg (39.7%) and 130 cases of Partial pressure of carbon dioxide in
artery (PaCO2) less than 35 mmHg (41.9%). Of the 289 PE cases, 274
(94.8%) exhibited elevated levels of D-dimer (above the standard threshold of
500 ng/ml). PASP of at least 50 mmHg was observed via
echocardiography in 102 of 228 cases (44.7%). Of the 247 cases that completed
the color Doppler ultrasound of the blood vessels, 127 (51.4%) were confirmed to
have DVT of the lower extremities, and 27 of these (21.3%) involved deep veins
in the bilateral lower extremities.In light of the management of PE from American Heart Association (AHA) (version
2011), among the 310 cases with acute PE, the massive, submassive and low-risk
PE groups accounted for 25 cases (8.1%), 92 cases (29.7%) and 193 cases (62.3%), respectively.[4]The PESI classification showed 165 patients in the low-risk group and 66 patients
in the high-risk group. The mean ± SD of the PESI score was 82.11 ± 26.86 in the
valid group and 178 ± 40.45 in the invalid group.The causes of PE for patients in the invalid group were as follows: seven cases
of active cancer with PE, two cases complicated by renal failure, two cases of
acute massive hemoptysis, one case of interstitial lung disease complicated by
spontaneous abdominal hematoma due to anticoagulant therapy, 13 cases of sudden
death (including one case that occurred after extubation treated by
catheter-directed thrombolysis and one case that occurred after surgical
embolectomy).Multivariable logistical regression analysis showed that massive PE, hypoxemia,
leukocytosis and active cancer may be associated with a poor prognosis for PE.
The estimated OR showed that patients with massive PE were 23.625 (95% CI
6.248–89.333) times more likely to have had a confirmed adverse outcome than
those with nonmassive PE. Furthermore, patients with leukocytosis were 9.120
(95% CI 2.227–37.349) times more likely to have had a confirmed adverse outcome
than those with non-leukocytosis. Active cancer was shown to be an independently
poor prognostic factor for PE, with an OR of 6.142 (95% CI 1.233–30.587).
Hypoxemia was significantly associated with the occurrence of an adverse outcome,
with an OR of 11.915 (95% CI 1.9–74.727) in a multivariable model (see Table 1). Due to short
hospital stay, we take the above-mentioned adverse factors as short-term poor
prognosis.
Table 1.
Risk factors associated with a curative effect (in hospital) as indicated
by the multivariable logistic regression model and parameter
estimation.
β
SE
Wald
Sig.
OR
95% CI for Exp (B)
Lower
Upper
Leukocytosis
2.210
0.719
9.444
0.002
9.120
2.227
37.349
Hypoxemia
2.478
0.937
6.996
0.008
11.915
1.900
74.727
Active cancer
1.815
0.819
4.910
0.027
6.142
1.233
30.587
Massive PE
3.162
0.679
21.714
0.000
23.625
6.248
89.333
Constant
−6.498
1.079
36.270
0.000
0.002
CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio; PE, pulmonary embolism; SE,
standard error; Sig., significance.
Risk factors associated with a curative effect (in hospital) as indicated
by the multivariable logistic regression model and parameter
estimation.CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio; PE, pulmonary embolism; SE,
standard error; Sig., significance.With regard to longitudinal follow up, 77 patients were followed for a period
ranging from 0.5 to 24 months (22.59 ± 19.27 months). During this follow-up
period, 22 patients died, 55 patients survived. The 1-month, 2-month and
24-month survival rates were 78.2%, 74.4% and 71.8%, respectively. Cox
regression analysis showed that elevated PASP (⩾50 mmHg) and active cancer
significantly predicted adverse consequences in the mid-term follow up.
Specifically, the elevated PASP group (⩾50 mmHg) was associated with an
increased risk of mid-term mortality, with a hazard ratio of 9.240 (95% CI
2.307–37.013), relative to the nonelevated PASP group. Likewise, active cancer
with PE was associated with an increased risk of mid-term mortality, yielding a
hazard ratio of 3.700 (95% CI 1.010–13.562; see Table 2). Figure 2 demonstrates the 24-month
cumulative survival function of acute PE. Figure 3 demonstrates that the survival
rate for patients in the elevated PASP group was lower than that for patients in
the nonelevated PASP group.
Table 2.
Prognostic factors affecting survival time as indicated by the Cox
proportional hazards regression model and parameter estimation.
β
SE
Wald
Sig.
HR
95% CI for Exp (B)
Lower
Upper
The elevated PASP group
2.224
0.708
9.861
0.002
9.240
2.307
37.013
Active cancer
1.308
0.663
3.898
0.048
3.700
1.010
13.562
CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio; PE, pulmonary embolism;
SE, standard error; Sig., significance.
Figure 2.
The cumulative survival function at the 24-month follow up for patients
with acute pulmonary embolism (PE).
Figure 3.
Cumulative survival functions at different pulmonary artery systolic
pressures (PASPs). PE, pulmonary embolism.
Prognostic factors affecting survival time as indicated by the Cox
proportional hazards regression model and parameter estimation.CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio; PE, pulmonary embolism;
SE, standard error; Sig., significance.The cumulative survival function at the 24-month follow up for patients
with acute pulmonary embolism (PE).Cumulative survival functions at different pulmonary artery systolic
pressures (PASPs). PE, pulmonary embolism.
Discussion
Our study demonstrated a significant adverse association between massive PE and a
curative effect (in hospital). The estimated OR showed that the massive PE was the
maximum weight of assessment indicator in our study. It is believed that hemodynamic
change rather than the Miller Index represents clinically reliable evidence, and
provides a more accurate judgment of adverse prognoses. The 2008 management of PE
from the European Society of Cardiology and the 2011 management of PE from the AHA
both focused on the study of short-term mortality rates for people with an acute PE
reported from the International Cooperative Pulmonary Embolism Registry (ICOPER),
the results of which showed that a systolic blood pressure below 90 mmHg correlated
with the 90-day mortality of patients with acute PE.[8-10] Hemodynamic compromise was the
most critical clinical feature of massive PE, and the estimated mortality for
inpatients with hemodynamic instability increased to 15%.[9] In addition, hypotension as an important index was included in the PESI
scale. As is well known, PESI has discriminative power to predict short-term death
in patients with acute PE. A meta-analysis showed that the overall weighted area
under the curve for PESI predicting all-cause mortality and PE-related mortality was
0.78 and 0.82 respectively.[11] Our study showed that the PESI value of the invalid group rose to 178 ±
40.45, apparently higher than that of the valid group (82.11 ± 26.86). Nevertheless,
because PESI includes 11 subitems that we believed might increase the model
instability, PESI did not ultimately enter into the multivariable logistic
regression model.Research on the relationship between malignancies and venous thromboembolism (VTE)
has existed since the nineteenth century. Meta-analyses in recent years have
provided reliable data. A 2006 study involving 41 million patients with 19 types of
malignancies showed that 2% of these patients developed VTE, and the incidence was
twice as much as that in patients without malignancies. The malignancy with the
highest VTE incidence was mucinous carcinoma of the pancreas, followed by brain
malignancy and myeloproliferative malignancy.[12] Another meta-analysis involving 114,922 patients with lung cancer showed the
incidence of PE to be 3.6%, while adenocarcinoma of the lung was the pathological
type with the highest incidence of VTE.[13] In addition, Sun and colleagues demonstrated that adenocarcinomas were the
most prevalent histologic type associated with PE in a study involving 8014 patients
with lung cancer.[14] A major reason for this relationship is that active cancer secretes more
procoagulant substances, which are related to the biological characteristics of
tumor cells. Another reason is the medical interventions among patients with tumor,
such as surgical trauma, deep vein catheterization, antitumor drugs and
glucocorticoids, which can directly or indirectly influence the dynamic equilibrium
of the coagulation–fibrinolysis system and lead to thrombosis. In this study, 35
cases of malignancy with PE were observed. The 11 cases of lung cancer were all
non-small cell lung cancer, and adenocarcinoma (8/11) was the most common
pathological type. There were four patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and
three patients with breast invasive ductal carcinoma, which was consistent with the
pathological types with high VTE incidence in the literature.With the increasing research on the prognosis of PE, large-sample long-term follow
ups brought us new ideas, but the results from different studies were inconsistent
and even conflicting. Naess and colleagues studied the general population of
North-Trøndelag County in Norway for 6.5 years and suggested that the risk of
mortality was highest in the first months after the VTE, after which it gradually
approached the mortality rate in the general population.[15] Schulman evaluated 545 patients at a 10-year follow up and found that the
morbidity and mortality during the 10 years after the first episode of VTE were high
and were not reduced by the extension of secondary prophylaxis from 6 weeks to 6 months.[16] These different results may be attributed to factors such as different study
designs, different races and environmental impacts. As shown in Figure 3, the survival curve during the first
90 days after PE was significantly decreased, followed by a slower decrease after
that, which was consistent with the results from Naess and colleagues.[15] However, discovering whether the survival rate will approach that of the
general population requires further demonstration by strict follow up of larger
samples over a longer period of time.Spencer and colleagues reported that the 30-day, 1-year and 3-year mortality of 1691
patients with validated acute PE were 13.0%, 26.0% and 35.3%, respectively.[17] In our study, the 1-month mortality was higher than that of the study above,
which may have been affected by sample size and an admission bias. Clearly,
stratification analysis enables more accurate results. The data from ICOPER
displayed that the 90-day mortality rates were 52.4% (95% CI 43.3%–62.1%) in
patients with massive PE and 14.7% (95% CI 13.3%–16.2%) in patients with nonmassive
PE, respectively.[9]Pulmonary hypertension (PH) has been thought to be the final result of hemodynamic
compromise and persistent pulmonary artery perfusion defect. A recent pathological
study demonstrated that if acute PEs have not resolved in 1–4 weeks, the embolic
material becomes incorporated into the pulmonary arterial wall at the pulmonary
artery and its branches.[18] Remodeling of the pulmonary circulation leads to elevated pulmonary artery
pressure and progressive right ventricular failure. Riedel and colleagues followed
76 patients with PE for 1–15 years, finding that the mortality of patients with an
initial average pulmonary artery pressure greater than 40 mmHg was approximately
70%, while the mortality increased to 90% when the average pulmonary artery pressure
increased to 50 mmHg, suggesting that PH and its severity were important prognostic indicators.[19] Our study showed that the elevated PASP group (⩾50 mmHg) had an adverse
effect on survival time. As shown in Figure 3, the survival rate of the elevated
PASP group (⩾50 mmHg) was significantly lower than that for controls (<50
mmHg).
Limitations
Several limitations of the present study should be mentioned. First, an
echocardiogram is useful for screening but insufficient for diagnosis.
Diagnostic evaluation including pulmonary angiography and invasive cardiac
valuation were largely limited in clinical applications because of the higher
costs and risks. Taleb and colleagues conducted a meta-analysis including nine
articles, which demonstrated that the correlation between PASP estimated by
Doppler echocardiography (DE) and right heart catheterization ranged from
r = 0.65 (p < 0.001) to
r = 0.97 (p < 0.001).[20] The pooled sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of DE for the diagnosis
of PH were 88% (95% CI 84%–92%), 56% (95% CI 46%–66%) and 63% (95% CI 53%–73%)
respectively. Therefore, there was some impact on the accuracy of the estimated
PASP. Second, due to the low autopsy rates, we are unable to estimate accurately
the rates of fatal PE and can only observe all-cause mortality. Third, because
this study was a retrospective study, there were many reasons for missing data,
like referral to other hospitals, data incomplete and so on. Two years later,
complete electronic records of 77 patients were finally obtained during hospital
readmission or clinic visits. High-quality cohort studies with bigger samples
were suggested to be further developed.
Conclusion
Massive PE, hypoxemia, leukocytosis and active cancer may contribute to a poor
prognosis for patients with acute PE in the short term. Elevated PASP and active
cancer may negatively impact survival time in the mid-term follow up. In addition,
adverse factors of acute PE in the short term are not exactly the same as risk
factors in the mid-term follow up.
Authors: Paul D Stein; Afzal Beemath; Frederick A Meyers; Elias Skaf; Julia Sanchez; Ronald E Olson Journal: Am J Med Date: 2006-01 Impact factor: 4.965
Authors: I A Naess; S C Christiansen; P Romundstad; S C Cannegieter; F R Rosendaal; J Hammerstrøm Journal: J Thromb Haemost Date: 2007-04 Impact factor: 5.824