Literature DB >> 16432055

Massive pulmonary embolism.

Nils Kucher1, Elisa Rossi, Marisa De Rosa, Samuel Z Goldhaber.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Acute massive pulmonary embolism (PE) carries an exceptionally high mortality rate. We explored how often adjunctive therapies, particularly thrombolysis and inferior vena caval (IVC) filter placement, were performed and how these therapies affected the clinical outcome of patients with massive PE. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Among 2392 patients with acute PE and known systolic arterial blood pressure at presentation, from the International Cooperative Pulmonary Embolism Registry (ICOPER), 108 (4.5%) had massive PE, defined as a systolic arterial pressure <90 mm Hg, and 2284 (95.5%) had non-massive PE with a systolic arterial pressure > or =90 mm Hg. PE was first diagnosed at autopsy in 16 patients (15%) with massive PE and in 29 patients (1%) with non-massive PE (P<0.001). The 90-day mortality rates were 52.4% (95% CI, 43.3% to 62.1%) and 14.7% (95% CI, 13.3% to 16.2%), respectively. In-hospital bleeding complications occurred in 17.6% versus 9.7% and recurrent PE within 90 days in 12.6% and 7.6%, respectively (P<0.001). In patients with massive PE, thrombolysis, surgical embolectomy, or catheter embolectomy were withheld in 73 (68%). Thrombolysis was performed in 33 patients, surgical embolectomy in 3, and catheter embolectomy in 1. Thrombolytic therapy did not reduce 90-day mortality (thrombolysis, 46.3%; 95% CI, 31.0% to 64.8%; no thrombolysis, 55.1%; 95% CI, 44.3% to 66.7%; hazard ratio, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.44 to 1.43). Recurrent PE rates at 90 days were similar in patients with and without thrombolytic therapy (12% for both; P=0.99). None of the 11 patients who received an IVC filter developed recurrent PE within 90 days, and 10 (90.9%) survived at least 90 days. IVC filters were associated with a reduction in 90-day mortality (hazard ratio, 0.12; 95% CI, 0.02 to 0.85).
CONCLUSIONS: In ICOPER, two thirds of the patients with massive PE did not receive thrombolysis or embolectomy. Counterintuitively, thrombolysis did not reduce mortality or recurrent PE at 90 days. The observed reduction in mortality from IVC filters requires further investigation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16432055     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.592592

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  112 in total

1.  Aggressive approach to pulmonary embolectomy for massive acute pulmonary embolism: a historical and contemporary perspective.

Authors:  P Michael McFadden; John L Ochsner
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 7.616

2.  The masquerade of massive pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  Samya G Obaji; Unni Krishnan
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 3.  Potential role of systemic thrombolysis in acute submassive intermediate risk pulmonary embolism: review and future perspectives.

Authors:  Mohamed Teleb; Mateo Porres-Aguilar; Javier E Anaya-Ayala; Carlos Rodriguez-Castro; Mateo Porres-Muñoz; Debabrata Mukherjee
Journal:  Ther Adv Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2016-02-09

Review 4.  A narrative review of red blood cell distribution width as a marker for pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  Lindsay Hammons; Jason Filopei; David Steiger; Eric Bondarsky
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 2.300

5.  Antithrombotic therapy for VTE disease: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  Clive Kearon; Elie A Akl; Anthony J Comerota; Paolo Prandoni; Henri Bounameaux; Samuel Z Goldhaber; Michael E Nelson; Philip S Wells; Michael K Gould; Francesco Dentali; Mark Crowther; Susan R Kahn
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 9.410

6.  Analysis of National Trends in Admissions for Pulmonary Embolism.

Authors:  Sean B Smith; Jeffrey B Geske; Parul Kathuria; Michael Cuttica; Daniel R Schimmel; D Mark Courtney; Grant W Waterer; Richard G Wunderink
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 9.410

7.  Surgical embolectomy for acute massive pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  Senol Yavuz; Faruk Toktas; Tugrul Goncu; Cuneyt Eris; Arif Gucu; Derih Ay; Burak Erdolu; Erhan Tenekecioglu; Kemal Karaagac; Hakan Vural; Ahmet Ozyazicioglu
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2014-12-15

8.  [Acute pulmonary embolism: still a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge?]

Authors:  R Felgendreher; D Härtel; J Brockmeier; K Bramlage; T Aschenbrenner; J Götz; P Bramlage; U Tebbe
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2016-11-02       Impact factor: 0.840

9.  Choice of marker for assessment of RV dysfunction in acute pulmonary embolism : NT-proBNP, pulmonary artery systolic pressure, mean arterial pressure, or blood pressure index.

Authors:  H Ates; I Ates; H Kundi; F M Yilmaz
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2016-12-13       Impact factor: 1.443

10.  Treatment of mobile right heart thrombi with low-molecular-weight heparin.

Authors:  Konstantinos M Lampropoulos; Maria Bonou; Constantinos Theocharis; John Barbetseas
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2013-03-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.