Literature DB >> 10227218

Acute pulmonary embolism: clinical outcomes in the International Cooperative Pulmonary Embolism Registry (ICOPER)

S Z Goldhaber1, L Visani, M De Rosa.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary embolism (PE) remains poorly understood. Rates of clinical outcomes such as death and recurrence vary widely among trials. We therefore established the International Cooperative Pulmonary Embolism Registry (ICOPER), with the aim of identifying factors associated with death.
METHODS: 2454 consecutive eligible patients with acute PE were registered from 52 hospitals in seven countries in Europe and North America. The primary outcome measure was all-cause mortality at 3 months. The prognostic effect of baseline factors on survival was assessed with multivariate analyses.
FINDINGS: 2110 (86.0%) patients had PE proven by necropsy, high-probability lung scan, pulmonary angiography, or venous ultrasonography plus high clinical suspicion; ICOPER accepted without independent review diagnoses and interpretation of imaging provided by participating centres; 3-month follow-up was completed in 98.0% of patients. The overall crude mortality rate at 3 months was 17.4% (426 of 2454 deaths, including 52 patients lost to follow-up): 179 of 397 (45.1%) deaths were ascribed to PE and 70 of 397 (17.6%) to cancer, and no information on the cause of death was available for 29 patients. After exclusion of 61 patients in whom PE was first discovered at necropsy, the mortality rate at 3 months was 15.3% (365 of 2393 deaths). On multiple-regression modelling, age over 70 years (hazard ratio 1.6 [95% CI 1.1-2.3]), cancer (2.3 [1.5-3.5]), congestive heart failure (2.4 [1.5-3.7]), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (1.8 [1.2-2.7]), systolic arterial hypotension (2.9 [1.7-5.0]), tachypnoea (2.0 [1.2-3.2]), and right-ventricular hypokinesis on echocardiography (2.0 [1.3-2.9]) were identified as significant prognostic factors.
INTERPRETATION: PE remains an important clinical problem with a high mortality rate. Data from ICOPER provide rates and highlight adverse prognostic categories that will help in planning of future trials of high-risk PE patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10227218     DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(98)07534-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  480 in total

1.  Diagnostic value of transoesophageal echocardiography in suspected haemodynamically significant pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  P Pruszczyk; A Torbicki; A Kuch-Wocial; M Szulc; R Pacho
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  Caution for acute submassive pulmonary embolism with syncope as initial symptom: a case report.

Authors:  Sheng-Yu Wang; Hui Chen; Li-Gai Di
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  British Thoracic Society guidelines for the management of suspected acute pulmonary embolism.

Authors: 
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 9.139

Review 4.  [Extracardiac causes of right ventricular insufficiency].

Authors:  B Maisch; M Christ
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 0.743

5.  Prognostic significance of multidetector computed tomography in normotensive patients with pulmonary embolism: rationale, methodology and reproducibility for the PROTECT study.

Authors:  David Jiménez; José Luis Lobo; Manuel Monreal; Remedios Otero; Roger D Yusen
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 2.300

6.  Percutaneous circulatory support in a patient with cardiac arrest due to acute pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  Jürgen Leick; Christoph Liebetrau; Sebastian Szardien; Matthias Willmer; Johannes Rixe; Holger Nef; Andreas Rolf; Christian Hamm; Helge Möllmann
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2012-06-12       Impact factor: 5.460

7.  All contraindications to thrombolysis for life-threatening pulmonary embolus should be considered relative.

Authors:  Rachel M Mercer; Jordan S T Bowen; Richard J Armstrong
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2013-12-10

Review 8.  Is the lung scan alive and well? Facts and controversies in defining the role of lung scintigraphy for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism in the era of MDCT.

Authors:  John H Reid; Emmanuel E Coche; Tomio Inoue; Edmund E Kim; Maurizio Dondi; Naoyuki Watanabe; Giuliano Mariani
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2009-01-27       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 9.  Rationale for catheter directed therapy in pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  Sailen G Naidu; Martha-Gracia Knuttinen; J Scott Kriegshauser; William G Eversman; Rahmi Oklu
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2017-12

Review 10.  Deep venous thrombosis in pregnancy: incidence, pathogenesis and endovascular management.

Authors:  Paola Devis; M Grace Knuttinen
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2017-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.