Literature DB >> 23176331

Presentation, management, and outcome of newly diagnosed glioblastoma in elderly patients.

Shota Tanaka1, Fredric B Meyer, Jan C Buckner, Joon H Uhm, Elizabeth S Yan, Ian F Parney.   

Abstract

OBJECT: Optimum management for elderly patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM) in the temozolomide (TMZ) era is not well defined. The object of this study was to clarify outcomes in this population.
METHODS: The authors retrospectively reviewed 105 consecutive cases involving elderly patients (age ≥ 65 years) with newly diagnosed GBM who were treated at the Mayo Clinic between 2003 and 2008.
RESULTS: The patients' median age was 74 years (range 66-87 years), and the median Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) score was 80 (range 40-90). Half of the patients underwent biopsy and half underwent resection. Patients with deep-seated lesions (19 patients [18%]) or multifocal lesions (34 patients [32%]) were more likely to have biopsy than resection (p = 0.0001 and 0.0009, respectively). New persistent neurological deficits developed in 7 patients (6.7%). Postoperative hemorrhage occurred in 6 patients (5.7%), all of whom underwent biopsy. Complete follow-up data regarding adjuvant treatment was available in 84 patients. Forty-one (49%) were treated with chemotherapy (mostly TMZ) and radiation therapy (RT), and 23 (27%) with RT alone. Nineteen (23%) received only palliative care after surgery (more common with biopsy, p = 0.03). Chemotherapy complications occurred in 28.6% (Grade 3 or 4 hematological complications in 11.9%). The median values for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 3.5 and 5.5 months. In a multivariate analysis, younger age (p = 0.03, risk ratio [RR] 0.34, 95% CI 0.13-0.89), single lesion (p = 0.02, RR 0.51, 95% CI 0.30-0.89), resection (p = 0.04, RR 0.54, 95% CI 0.31-0.94), and adjuvant treatment (p = 0.0001, RR 0.24, 95% CI 0.11-0.49) were associated with better OS. Only adjuvant treatment was significantly associated with prolonged PFS (p = 0.0007, RR 0.27, 95% CI 0.13-0.57). With combined therapy with resection, RT, and chemotherapy, the median PFS and OS were 8 and 12.5 months, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The prognosis for GBM worsens with increasing age in elderly patients. With important risks, resection and adjuvant treatment are associated with prolonged survival. Although selection bias cannot be excluded in this retrospective study, advanced age alone should not necessarily preclude optimal resection followed by adjuvant radiochemotherapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23176331     DOI: 10.3171/2012.10.JNS112268

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg        ISSN: 0022-3085            Impact factor:   5.115


  35 in total

1.  Biopsy versus resection in the management of high-grade gliomas in the elderly.

Authors:  Yingjie Zou; Harrison Xiao Bai; Zhili Wang; Li Yang
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2015-03-10       Impact factor: 12.300

2.  Prognostication of Survival Outcomes in Patients Diagnosed with Glioblastoma.

Authors:  Damir Nizamutdinov; Eileen M Stock; Jad A Dandashi; Eliana A Vasquez; Ying Mao; Samantha Dayawansa; Jun Zhang; Erxi Wu; Ekokobe Fonkem; Jason H Huang
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2017-09-23       Impact factor: 2.104

3.  Treatment and outcomes for glioblastoma in elderly compared with non-elderly patients: a population-based study.

Authors:  E R Morgan; A Norman; K Laing; M D Seal
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2017-04-27       Impact factor: 3.677

4.  Stereotactic biopsy in elderly patients: risk assessment and impact on treatment decision.

Authors:  Stephanie G Kellermann; Christina A Hamisch; Daniel Rueß; Tobias Blau; Roland Goldbrunner; Harald Treuer; Stefan J Grau; Maximilian I Ruge
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 4.130

5.  Age alone is not a predictor for survival in glioblastoma.

Authors:  Lucy Gately; Anna Collins; Michael Murphy; Anthony Dowling
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 4.130

6.  Elderly patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma: can preoperative imaging descriptors improve the predictive power of a survival model?

Authors:  Mina Park; Seung-Koo Lee; Jong Hee Chang; Seok-Gu Kang; Eui Hyun Kim; Se Hoon Kim; Mi Kyung Song; Bo Gyoung Ma; Sung Soo Ahn
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2017-07-03       Impact factor: 4.130

7.  Glioblastoma survival is improving despite increasing incidence rates: a nationwide study between 2000 and 2013 in Finland.

Authors:  Miikka Korja; Rahul Raj; Karri Seppä; Tapio Luostarinen; Nea Malila; Matti Seppälä; Hanna Mäenpää; Janne Pitkäniemi
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2019-02-19       Impact factor: 12.300

8.  Effect of patient age on glioblastoma perioperative treatment costs: a value driven outcome database analysis.

Authors:  Brandon A Sherrod; Nicholas T Gamboa; Christopher Wilkerson; Herschel Wilde; Mohammed A Azab; Michael Karsy; Randy L Jensen; Sarah T Menacho
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2019-05-04       Impact factor: 4.130

9.  One decade of glioblastoma multiforme surgery in 342 elderly patients: what have we learned?

Authors:  Dieter Henrik Heiland; Gerrit Haaker; Ralf Watzlawick; Daniel Delev; Waseem Masalha; Pamela Franco; Marcia Machein; Ori Staszewski; Oliver Oelhke; Nils Henrik Nicolay; Oliver Schnell
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2018-08-03       Impact factor: 4.130

10.  Surgical complications following malignant brain tumor surgery: An analysis of 2002-2011 data.

Authors:  Rafael De la Garza-Ramos; Panagiotis Kerezoudis; Rafael J Tamargo; Henry Brem; Judy Huang; Mohamad Bydon
Journal:  Clin Neurol Neurosurg       Date:  2015-11-12       Impact factor: 1.876

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.