Literature DB >> 28673535

Nipple-sparing and skin-sparing mastectomy: Review of aims, oncological safety and contraindications.

Viviana Galimberti1, Elisa Vicini2, Giovanni Corso2, Consuelo Morigi2, Sabrina Fontana2, Virgilio Sacchini3, Paolo Veronesi3.   

Abstract

Skin-sparing (SSM) and nipple-sparing (NSM) mastectomies are relatively new conservative surgical approaches to breast cancer. In SSM most of the breast skin is conserved to create a pocket that facilitates immediate breast reconstruction with implant or autologous graft to achieve a quality cosmetic outcome. NSM is closely similar except that the nipple-areola complex (NAC) is also conserved. Meta-analyses indicate that outcomes for SSM and NSM do not differ from those for non-conservative mastectomies. Recurrence rates in the NAC after NSM are acceptably low (0-3.7%). Other studies indicate that NSM is associated with high patient satisfaction and good psychological adjustment. Indications are carcinoma or DCIS that require mastectomy (including after neoadjuvant chemotherapy). NSM is also suitable for women undergoing risk-reducing bilateral mastectomy. Tumor not less than 2 cm from the NAC is recommended, but may be less important than no evidence of nipple involvement on mandatory intraoperative nipple margin assessment. A positive margin is an absolute contraindication for nipple preservation. Other contraindications are microcalcifications close to the subareolar region and a positive nipple discharge. Complication rates are similar to those for other types of post-mastectomy reconstructions. The main complication of NSM is NAC necrosis, however as surgeon experience matures, frequency declines. Factors associated with complications are voluminous breast, ptosis, smoking, obesity, and radiotherapy. Since the access incision is small, breast tissue may be left behind, so only experienced breast surgeons should do these operations in close collaboration with the plastic surgeon. For breast cancer patients requiring mastectomy, NSM should be the option of choice.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer; Conservative mastectomy; NSM; Oncoplastic surgery; Skin-sparing mastectomy

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28673535      PMCID: PMC5837802          DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2017.06.034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast        ISSN: 0960-9776            Impact factor:   4.380


  20 in total

Review 1.  Nipple-sparing mastectomy in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers: an interim analysis and review of the literature.

Authors:  Katharine Yao; Erik Liederbach; Rong Tang; Lan Lei; Tomasz Czechura; Mark Sisco; Michael Howard; Peter J Hulick; Scott Weissman; David J Winchester; Suzanne B Coopey; Barbara L Smith
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Risk of recurrence after treatment of early breast cancer with skin-sparing mastectomy: two editorial perspectives.

Authors:  G W Carlson
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  Complications of mastectomy and their relationship to biopsy technique.

Authors:  K A Lipshy; J P Neifeld; R M Boyle; W J Frable; S Ronan; P Lotfi; H D Bear; J S Horsley; W Lawrence
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  Long-term oncological results of breast conservative treatment with oncoplastic surgery.

Authors:  M Rietjens; C A Urban; P C Rey; G Mazzarol; P Maisonneuve; C Garusi; M Intra; S Yamaguchi; N Kaur; F De Lorenzi; A G Z Matthes; S Zurrida; J Y Petit
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2007-03-26       Impact factor: 4.380

5.  Axillary dissection vs no axillary dissection in women with invasive breast cancer and sentinel node metastasis: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Armando E Giuliano; Kelly K Hunt; Karla V Ballman; Peter D Beitsch; Pat W Whitworth; Peter W Blumencranz; A Marilyn Leitch; Sukamal Saha; Linda M McCall; Monica Morrow
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2011-02-09       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  The Effect of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Compared to Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Healing after Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy.

Authors:  Jordan D Frey; Mihye Choi; Nolan S Karp
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 4.730

7.  Surgical outcomes and nipple projection using the modified skate flap for nipple-areolar reconstruction in a series of 422 implant reconstructions.

Authors:  Toni Zhong; Anu Antony; Peter Cordeiro
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 1.539

8.  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is not a contraindication for nipple sparing mastectomy.

Authors:  Stefano Santoro; Andrea Loreti; Francesco Cavaliere; Leopoldo Costarelli; Massimo La Pinta; Elena Manna; Maria Mauri; Paola Scavina; Elena Santini; Ugo De Paula; Vito Toto; Lucio Fortunato
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 4.380

9.  Does nipple preservation in mastectomy improve satisfaction with cosmetic results, psychological adjustment, body image and sexuality?

Authors:  F Didier; D Radice; S Gandini; R Bedolis; N Rotmensz; A Maldifassi; B Santillo; A Luini; V Galimberti; E Scaffidi; F Lupo; S Martella; J Y Petit
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2008-11-12       Impact factor: 4.872

10.  Breast cancer: from "maximum tolerable" to "minimum effective" treatment.

Authors:  Umberto Veronesi; Vaia Stafyla; Alberto Luini; Paolo Veronesi
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2012-10-08       Impact factor: 6.244

View more
  37 in total

1.  Does Age Matter? Estimating Risks of Locoregional Recurrence After Breast-conservative Surgery.

Authors:  Gianluca Vanni; Marco Materazzo; Marco Pellicciaro; Ljuba Morando; Ilaria Portarena; Lucia Anemona; Maria Rolando D'Angelillo; Rosaria Barbarino; Agostino Chiaravalloti; Rosaria Meucci; Tommaso Perretta; Camilla Deiana; Paolo Orsaria; Jonathan Caspi; Chiara Adriana Pistolese; Oreste Claudio Buonomo
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2020 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.155

Review 2.  Current Therapeutic Approaches to DCIS.

Authors:  Kaleigh Doke; Shirley Butler; Melissa P Mitchell
Journal:  J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia       Date:  2018-09-29       Impact factor: 2.673

3.  Identifying the dissection plane for mastectomy-description and visualization of our technique.

Authors:  Camilla Bille; Farima Dalaei; Jørn Bo Thomsen
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2019-10

4.  Use of bilateral prophylactic nipple-sparing mastectomy in patients with high risk of breast cancer.

Authors:  M G Valero; T-A Moo; S Muhsen; E C Zabor; M Stempel; A Pusic; M L Gemignani; M Morrow; V Sacchini
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Immediate Implant-Based Reconstruction with or Without Skin Reduction in Patients with Large Ptotic Breasts: A Case-Matched Analysis.

Authors:  Sukru Yazar; Fuat Baris Bengur; Altug Altinkaya; Halil Kara; Cihan Uras
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 2.326

6.  A Comparison of Patient-Reported Outcomes After Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Conventional Mastectomy with Reconstruction.

Authors:  Anya Romanoff; Emily C Zabor; Michelle Stempel; Virgilio Sacchini; Andrea Pusic; Monica Morrow
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-07-02       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  Effectiveness and Safety of Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction in Locally Advanced Breast Carcinoma: A Matched Case-Control Study.

Authors:  René Aloisio da Costa Vieira; Luciana Machado Ribeiro; Guilherme Freire Angotti Carrara; Lucas Faria Abrahão-Machado; Ligia Maria Kerr; Afonso Celso Pinto Nazário
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2019-05-03       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 8.  Nonsurgical Prevention Strategies in BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Carriers.

Authors:  Christian F Singer
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 2.860

9.  Reconstructive outcome analysis of the impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on immediate breast reconstruction: a retrospective cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Jia-Ruei Yang; Wen-Ling Kuo; Chi-Chang Yu; Shin-Cheh Chen; Jung-Ju Huang
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2021-05-08       Impact factor: 4.430

10.  Titanium-coated polypropylene mesh as innovative bioactive material in conservatives mastectomies and pre-pectoral breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Pietro Gentile; Marco Bernini; Lorenzo Orzalesi; Silvia Sordi; Icro Meattini; Francesca Lessi; Ashutosh Kothari; Claudio Calabrese
Journal:  Bioact Mater       Date:  2021-05-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.