Literature DB >> 19387168

Surgical outcomes and nipple projection using the modified skate flap for nipple-areolar reconstruction in a series of 422 implant reconstructions.

Toni Zhong1, Anu Antony, Peter Cordeiro.   

Abstract

Numerous techniques have been used in an attempt to achieve long-term nipple projection following nipple-areolar reconstruction (NAR). A common setback, however, is the diminution of projection over time; this phenomenon is particularly evident following implant based breast reconstruction. The purpose of this report was thus to evaluate surgical outcomes and long-term nipple projection with the use of "modified skate flap" technique in exclusively implant based postmastectomy reconstructions. A retrospective review was performed for the period between 1993 and 2007. All consecutive patients with 2-staged tissue expander/implant reconstructions followed by NAR using the modified skate flap technique performed by the senior author (P.C.) were identified in a prospectively maintained breast reconstruction database. Only patients with a minimum of 1-year follow-up were included in the study. Patients with a history of irradiation to the breast were excluded from nipple projection assessment. Clinical outcome measurements included long-term nipple projection as well as incidence of complications from the NAR procedure using the modified skate flap technique. Over the 15-year study period, 475 patients underwent 2-staged tissue expander/implant reconstruction followed by NAR using the modified skate flap technique. Of these, there was a total of 292 patients with the minimum requirement of 1-year follow-up post NAR (61% follow-up rate). The total number of reconstructed nipple areolar complexes evaluated in this series was 422 (130 bilateral and 162 unilateral NAR). Forty patients (28 unilateral and 12 bilateral NAR) who received radiation to their breasts were excluded from nipple projection assessment. At a median follow-up of 44 months (range: 12-84 months), mean nipple projection was 2.5 mm (range: 1-4 mm). Minor complications occurred in 7.2% of the patients (n = 292). Skin graft donor site dehiscence was the most common complication (3.1%) followed by partial skin graft nontake of the areola (2.1%). This report documents the largest series of NAR using a single technique in the setting of postmastectomy reconstructions. This technique can be safely performed over breast implants with acceptably low rates of complications and predictable results. Long-term nipple projection over implant reconstructions using this technique is modest and this must be forewarned to patients completing the final stage of their implant reconstruction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19387168     DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e31819fb1c9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Plast Surg        ISSN: 0148-7043            Impact factor:   1.539


  14 in total

1.  Update on breast reconstruction techniques and indications.

Authors:  Jean-Yves Petit; Mario Rietjens; Visnu Lohsiriwat; Piercarlo Rey; Cristina Garusi; Francesca De Lorenzi; Stefano Martella; Andrea Manconi; Benedetta Barbieri; Krishna B Clough
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Psychosocial and Sexual Well-Being Following Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Reconstruction.

Authors:  Cindy H Wei; Amie M Scott; Alison N Price; Helen Catherine Miller; Anne F Klassen; Sabrina M Jhanwar; Babak J Mehrara; Joseph J Disa; Colleen McCarthy; Evan Matros; Peter G Cordeiro; Virgilio Sacchini; Andrea L Pusic
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.431

3.  Nipple-Areolar Complex Reconstruction: A Review of the Literature and Introduction of the Rectangle-to-Cube Nipple Flap.

Authors:  Joshua T Henderson; Thomas J Lee; Andrew M Swiergosz; Andrea R Hiller; Joshua Choo; Bradon J Wilhelmi
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2018-03-19

4.  Nipple Reconstruction: Risk Factors and Complications after 189 Procedures.

Authors:  Arash Momeni; Mina Ghaly; Deepak Gupta; Yvonne L Karanas; David M Kahn; Geoffrey C Gurtner; Gordon K Lee
Journal:  Eur J Plast Surg       Date:  2013-10-01

5.  Simultaneous nipple reconstruction in autologous breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Jong Ho Lee; Jeong Yeop Ryu; Jung Ho Lee; Jeeyeon Lee; Ho Yong Park; Jung Dug Yang; Joon Seok Lee
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2021-10

6.  The angel flap for nipple reconstruction.

Authors:  Wendy W Wong; Matthew A Hiersche; Mark C Martin
Journal:  Can J Plast Surg       Date:  2013

7.  Nipple reconstruction after implant-based breast reconstruction: a "matched-pair" outcome analysis focusing on the effects of radiotherapy.

Authors:  Arash Momeni; Mina Ghaly; Deepak Gupta; Geoffrey Gurtner; David M Kahn; Yvonne L Karanas; Gordon K Lee
Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg       Date:  2013-05-09       Impact factor: 2.740

Review 8.  Nipple-sparing and skin-sparing mastectomy: Review of aims, oncological safety and contraindications.

Authors:  Viviana Galimberti; Elisa Vicini; Giovanni Corso; Consuelo Morigi; Sabrina Fontana; Virgilio Sacchini; Paolo Veronesi
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 4.380

9.  Review of nipple reconstruction techniques and introduction of v to y technique in a bilateral wise pattern mastectomy or reduction mammaplasty.

Authors:  Charles A Riccio; Matthew R Zeiderman; Saeed Chowdhry; Bradon J Wilhelmi
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2015-04-06

10.  CASE REPORT Successful Breast Reconstruction in a Patient With Epidermolysis Bullosa.

Authors:  Claudia R Albornoz; Jane Goldstein; Geoffrey E Hespe; Virgilio Sacchini; Evan Matros
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2013-01-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.