Chad D Rethorst1, Charles C South1, A John Rush2, Tracy L Greer1, Madhukar H Trivedi1. 1. Department of Psychiatry, Center for Depression Research and Clinical Care, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA. 2. Duke-National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Only one-third of patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) achieve remission with initial treatment. Consequently, current clinical practice relies on a "trial-and-error" approach to identify an effective treatment for each patient. The purpose of this report was to determine whether we could identify a set of clinical and biological parameters with potential clinical utility for prescription of exercise for treatment of MDD in a secondary analysis of the Treatment with Exercise Augmentation in Depression (TREAD) trial. METHODS:Participants with nonremitted MDD were randomized to one of two exercise doses for 12 weeks. Participants were categorized as "remitters" (≤12 on the IDS-C), nonresponders (<30% drop in IDS-C), or neither. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) and random forests were used to evaluate 30 variables as predictors of both remission and nonresponse. Predictors were used to model treatment outcomes using logistic regression. RESULTS: Of the 122 participants, 36 were categorized as remitters (29.5%), 56 as nonresponders (45.9%), and 30 as neither (24.6%). Predictors of remission were higher levels of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and IL-1B, greater depressive symptom severity, and higher postexercise positive affect. Predictors of treatment nonresponse were low cardiorespiratory fitness, lower levels of IL-6 and BDNF, and lower postexercise positive affect. Models including these predictors resulted in predictive values greater than 70% (true predicted remitters/all predicted remitters) with specificities greater than 25% (true predicted remitters/all remitters). CONCLUSIONS: Results indicate feasibility in identifying patients who will either remit or not respond to exercise as a treatment for MDD utilizing a clinical decision model that incorporates multiple patient characteristics.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Only one-third of patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) achieve remission with initial treatment. Consequently, current clinical practice relies on a "trial-and-error" approach to identify an effective treatment for each patient. The purpose of this report was to determine whether we could identify a set of clinical and biological parameters with potential clinical utility for prescription of exercise for treatment of MDD in a secondary analysis of the Treatment with Exercise Augmentation in Depression (TREAD) trial. METHODS:Participants with nonremitted MDD were randomized to one of two exercise doses for 12 weeks. Participants were categorized as "remitters" (≤12 on the IDS-C), nonresponders (<30% drop in IDS-C), or neither. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) and random forests were used to evaluate 30 variables as predictors of both remission and nonresponse. Predictors were used to model treatment outcomes using logistic regression. RESULTS: Of the 122 participants, 36 were categorized as remitters (29.5%), 56 as nonresponders (45.9%), and 30 as neither (24.6%). Predictors of remission were higher levels of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and IL-1B, greater depressive symptom severity, and higher postexercise positive affect. Predictors of treatment nonresponse were low cardiorespiratory fitness, lower levels of IL-6 and BDNF, and lower postexercise positive affect. Models including these predictors resulted in predictive values greater than 70% (true predicted remitters/all predicted remitters) with specificities greater than 25% (true predicted remitters/all remitters). CONCLUSIONS: Results indicate feasibility in identifying patients who will either remit or not respond to exercise as a treatment for MDD utilizing a clinical decision model that incorporates multiple patient characteristics.
Authors: Madhukar H Trivedi; A John Rush; Stephen R Wisniewski; Andrew A Nierenberg; Diane Warden; Louise Ritz; Grayson Norquist; Robert H Howland; Barry Lebowitz; Patrick J McGrath; Kathy Shores-Wilson; Melanie M Biggs; G K Balasubramani; Maurizio Fava Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2006-01 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Tracy L Greer; Joseph M Trombello; Chad D Rethorst; Thomas J Carmody; Manish K Jha; Allen Liao; Bruce D Grannemann; Heather O Chambliss; Timothy S Church; Madhukar H Trivedi Journal: Depress Anxiety Date: 2016-05-10 Impact factor: 6.505
Authors: Madhukar H Trivedi; Tracy L Greer; Bruce D Grannemann; Timothy S Church; Daniel I Galper; Prabha Sunderajan; Stephen R Wisniewski; Heather O Chambliss; Alexander N Jordan; Carrie Finley; Thomas I Carmody Journal: Clin Trials Date: 2006 Impact factor: 2.486
Authors: Marisa S P Toups; Tracy L Greer; Benji T Kurian; Bruce D Grannemann; Thomas J Carmody; Ryan Huebinger; Chad Rethorst; Madhukar H Trivedi Journal: J Psychiatr Res Date: 2011-10 Impact factor: 4.791
Authors: Hannu Koponen; Jari Jokelainen; Sirkka Keinänen-Kiukaanniemi; Mauno Vanhala Journal: World J Biol Psychiatry Date: 2010-09 Impact factor: 4.132
Authors: Anisha M Suterwala; Chad D Rethorst; Thomas J Carmody; Tracy L Greer; Bruce D Grannemann; Manish Jha; Madhukar H Trivedi Journal: J Clin Psychiatry Date: 2016-08 Impact factor: 4.384
Authors: S M Sotsky; D R Glass; M T Shea; P A Pilkonis; J F Collins; I Elkin; J T Watkins; S D Imber; W R Leber; J Moyer Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 1991-08 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Zuleide M Ignácio; Renato S da Silva; Marcos E Plissari; João Quevedo; Gislaine Z Réus Journal: Mol Neurobiol Date: 2019-06-21 Impact factor: 5.590
Authors: Lisa A Uebelacker; Marie A Sillice; Gary Epstein-Lubow; Cynthia L Battle; Bradley Anderson; Celeste Caviness; Ivan W Miller; Ana M Abrantes Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2020-03-07 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: A John Rush; Madhukar H Trivedi; Charles South; Thomas J Carmody; Manish K Jha Journal: Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat Date: 2017-12-15 Impact factor: 2.570
Authors: Heidemarie Haller; Petra Voiß; Holger Cramer; Anna Paul; Mattea Reinisch; Sebastian Appelbaum; Gustav Dobos; Georg Sauer; Sherko Kümmel; Thomas Ostermann Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2021-06-23 Impact factor: 4.430