Literature DB >> 34162339

The INTREST registry: protocol of a multicenter prospective cohort study of predictors of women's response to integrative breast cancer treatment.

Heidemarie Haller1, Petra Voiß2,3, Holger Cramer2, Anna Paul2, Mattea Reinisch3, Sebastian Appelbaum4, Gustav Dobos2, Georg Sauer5, Sherko Kümmel3, Thomas Ostermann4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cancer registries usually assess data of conventional treatments and/or patient survival. Beyond that, little is known about the influence of other predictors of treatment response related to the use of complementary therapies (CM) and lifestyle factors affecting patients' quality and quantity of life.
METHODS: INTREST is a prospective cohort study collecting register data at multiple German certified cancer centers, which provide individualized, integrative, in- and outpatient breast cancer care. Patient-reported outcomes and clinical cancer data of anticipated N = 715 women with pTNM stage I-III breast cancer are collected using standardized case report forms at the time of diagnosis, after completing neo-/adjuvant chemotherapy, after completing adjuvant therapy (with the exception of endocrine therapy) as well as 1, 2, 5, and 10 years after baseline. Endpoints for multivariable prediction models are quality of life, fatigue, treatment adherence, and progression-based outcomes/survival. Predictors include the study center, sociodemographic characteristics, histologic cancer and comorbidity data, performance status, stress perception, depression, anxiety, sleep quality, spirituality, social support, physical activity, diet behavior, type of conventional treatments, use of and belief in CM treatments, and participation in a clinical trial. Safety is recorded following the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. DISCUSSION: This trial is currently recruiting participants. Future analyses will allow to identify predictors of short- and long-term response to integrative breast cancer treatment in women, which, in turn, may improve cancer care as well as quality and quantity of life with cancer. TRIAL REGISTRATION: German Clinical Trial Register DRKS00014852 . Retrospectively registered at July 4th, 2018.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast Cancer; Complementary medicine; Integrative Cancer treatment; Predictors; Treatment response

Year:  2021        PMID: 34162339     DOI: 10.1186/s12885-021-08468-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Cancer        ISSN: 1471-2407            Impact factor:   4.430


  47 in total

1.  Complementary and alternative medicines use by Scottish women with breast cancer. What, why and the potential for drug interactions?

Authors:  J S McLay; D Stewart; J George; C Rore; S D Heys
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 2.  Cancer patients at risk of herb/food supplement-drug interactions: a systematic review.

Authors:  Saud M Alsanad; Elizabeth M Williamson; Rachel L Howard
Journal:  Phytother Res       Date:  2014-08-26       Impact factor: 5.878

Review 3.  Reasons for and characteristics associated with complementary and alternative medicine use among adult cancer patients: a systematic review.

Authors:  Marja J Verhoef; Lynda G Balneaves; Heather S Boon; Annette Vroegindewey
Journal:  Integr Cancer Ther       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.279

4.  Integrative Therapies During and After Breast Cancer Treatment: ASCO Endorsement of the SIO Clinical Practice Guideline.

Authors:  Gary H Lyman; Heather Greenlee; Kari Bohlke; Ting Bao; Angela M DeMichele; Gary E Deng; Judith M Fouladbakhsh; Brigitte Gil; Dawn L Hershman; Sami Mansfield; Dawn M Mussallem; Karen M Mustian; Erin Price; Susan Rafte; Lorenzo Cohen
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-06-11       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Prevalence of mental health conditions in cancer patients in acute care--a meta-analysis.

Authors:  S Singer; J Das-Munshi; E Brähler
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2009-11-03       Impact factor: 32.976

Review 6.  Clinical practice guidelines on the use of integrative therapies as supportive care in patients treated for breast cancer.

Authors:  Heather Greenlee; Lynda G Balneaves; Linda E Carlson; Misha Cohen; Gary Deng; Dawn Hershman; Matthew Mumber; Jane Perlmutter; Dugald Seely; Ananda Sen; Suzanna M Zick; Debu Tripathy
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2014-11

7.  Use of complementary and alternative medicine by cancer patients at a Montreal hospital.

Authors:  Maida J Sewitch; Mark Yaffe; Jenny Maisonneuve; Jaroslav Prchal; Antonio Ciampi
Journal:  Integr Cancer Ther       Date:  2011-03-07       Impact factor: 3.279

8.  Use of complementary and alternative medicine in cancer patients: a European survey.

Authors:  A Molassiotis; P Fernández-Ortega; D Pud; G Ozden; J A Scott; V Panteli; A Margulies; M Browall; M Magri; S Selvekerova; E Madsen; L Milovics; I Bruyns; G Gudmundsdottir; S Hummerston; A M-A Ahmad; N Platin; N Kearney; E Patiraki
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2005-02-02       Impact factor: 32.976

9.  Potential interactions of complementary and alternative medicine with cancer therapy in outpatients with gynecological cancer in a comprehensive cancer center.

Authors:  T Zeller; K Muenstedt; C Stoll; J Schweder; B Senf; E Ruckhaeberle; S Becker; H Serve; J Huebner
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-10-26       Impact factor: 4.553

10.  Trends in complementary/alternative medicine use by breast cancer survivors: comparing survey data from 1998 and 2005.

Authors:  Heather S Boon; Folashade Olatunde; Suzanna M Zick
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2007-03-30       Impact factor: 2.809

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.